Catholic University of Applied Sciences Freiburg, Germany.
Catholic University of Applied Sciences Freiburg, Germany.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Feb;45:102104. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102104. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
Although exercise promotion is a central task of physiotherapists, there is limited evidence about physiotherapists' experiences with exercise promotion and their promotion practices.
To investigate how physiotherapists working in outpatient settings in Germany promote exercise and to explore their experiences with and views on exercise promotion.
Qualitative study with semi-structured interviews.
We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of physiotherapists. Data were analysed following Mayring's content analytical approach using deductive and inductive methods. Physiotherapists' methods of exercise promotion were classified using the behaviour change technique (BCT) taxonomy by Michie and colleagues. Further categories were formed in an inductive manner.
Six female and three male physiotherapists (age: 21-55 years, professional experience: 0.5-31 years) were interviewed. We identified the use of 17 distinct BCTs across the interviews (6-13 per interview), most commonly goal setting (behaviour), instruction on how to perform a behaviour and behavioural practice/rehearsal. Four inductive main categories were formed: "barriers and challenges", "facilitators", "responsibilities" and "dealing with setbacks". Lack of patient interest and motivation was named as a main challenge. While the therapists feel responsible for instructing exercise, not all of them regard it as their role to motivate patients. Resistance or lacking compliance lead therapists to either apply strategies to proceed or quit exercise promotion.
Our research implies substantial individual differences in exercise promotion between therapists. A more consistent approach, more competencies to support unmotivated patients as well as a clearer definition of physiotherapists' role in exercise promotion might be needed.
尽管促进运动是物理治疗师的核心任务,但关于物理治疗师在促进运动方面的经验及其促进实践的证据有限。
调查德国门诊环境中工作的物理治疗师如何促进运动,并探讨他们在促进运动方面的经验和看法。
定性研究,采用半结构式访谈。
我们对德国门诊环境中的物理治疗师进行了有针对性的半结构式访谈。使用 Mayring 的内容分析方法,采用演绎和归纳方法对数据进行分析。使用 Michie 及其同事的行为改变技术(BCT)分类法对物理治疗师的运动促进方法进行分类,并以归纳的方式形成其他类别。
共采访了 6 名女性和 3 名男性物理治疗师(年龄:21-55 岁,专业经验:0.5-31 年)。我们在访谈中发现使用了 17 种不同的 BCT(每个访谈 6-13 种),最常见的是目标设定(行为)、如何执行行为的指导以及行为实践/练习。形成了四个归纳的主要类别:“障碍和挑战”、“促进因素”、“责任”和“应对挫折”。缺乏患者的兴趣和动力被认为是主要挑战。虽然治疗师有责任指导运动,但并非所有人都认为激励患者是他们的职责。阻力或缺乏依从性导致治疗师要么应用策略继续进行,要么放弃运动促进。
我们的研究表明,治疗师在运动促进方面存在很大的个体差异。可能需要更一致的方法、更多支持缺乏动力的患者的能力以及更明确的物理治疗师在运动促进方面的角色定义。