Paukkunen Maija Tuulia, Holopainen Riikka, Öberg Birgitta, Ala-Mursula Leena, Karppinen Jaro, Elo Satu, Abbott Allan
Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13267-7.
We explored Finnish occupational healthcare professionals' (HCP) perceptions of biopsychosocial (BPS) low back pain (LBP) management after an educational intervention.
We conducted twelve group interviews of 51 physicians, physiotherapists and nurses from intervention units in a cluster randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN11875357). We used deductive and inductive content analysis to examine the data, and the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model to identify the facilitators of and barriers to changes in three target behaviours: (A) forming a common BPS-based understanding with patients, (B) systematically using risk stratification tools, and (C) multidisciplinary collaboration in individualized care planning.
Facilitators and barriers were categorized into the following COM-B domains. Most of the facilitators were in the Capability and Motivation domains: increased confidence regarding managing treatment decisions, improved therapeutic alliance and renewed professional identity. Significant system-level barriers were mostly in the Opportunity domain: time constraints, limited resources and unclear treatment pathways. The HCPs reported improved individual skills and awareness after the training, but varying organizational policies and lacking incentives hindered the adoption of BPS methods in multidisciplinary teams. Initial resistance to change decreased as positive patient outcomes emerged. The perceived benefits were increased multidisciplinary collaboration and a shift toward holistic pain management. Those who embraced BPS management reported greater professional satisfaction and confidence when handling LBP patients.
To effectively implement BPS management in occupational health services, organizational and system-level barriers must be addressed and HCPs' skills and motivation enhanced. For sustained support through policy initiatives and reinforced multidisciplinary collaboration, future strategies should integrate BPS practices into routine workflows.
The trial was retrospectively registered on 13.05.2019 ISRCTN11875357.
我们探讨了在一次教育干预后,芬兰职业医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对生物心理社会(BPS)下腰痛(LBP)管理的看法。
在一项整群随机对照试验(ISRCTN11875357)中,我们对来自干预单位的51名医生、物理治疗师和护士进行了12次小组访谈。我们使用演绎和归纳内容分析法来检查数据,并使用能力-机会-动机-行为(COM-B)模型来确定三种目标行为改变的促进因素和障碍:(A)与患者形成基于BPS的共同理解,(B)系统地使用风险分层工具,以及(C)在个性化护理计划中进行多学科协作。
促进因素和障碍被归类到以下COM-B领域。大多数促进因素在能力和动机领域:对管理治疗决策的信心增强、治疗联盟改善以及职业认同感更新。重大的系统层面障碍大多在机会领域:时间限制、资源有限和治疗途径不明确。HCP报告称培训后个人技能和意识有所提高,但不同的组织政策和缺乏激励措施阻碍了多学科团队采用BPS方法。随着积极的患者结果出现,对变革的初始抵触情绪有所降低。感知到的好处是多学科协作增加以及向整体疼痛管理的转变。那些接受BPS管理的人在处理LBP患者时报告了更高的职业满意度和信心。
为了在职业健康服务中有效实施BPS管理,必须解决组织和系统层面的障碍,并提高HCP的技能和积极性。为了通过政策举措和加强多学科协作获得持续支持,未来的策略应将BPS实践纳入常规工作流程。
该试验于2019年5月13日进行回顾性注册,注册号为ISRCTN11875357。