Smith Alistair M S, Kolden Crystal A, Paveglio Travis B, Cochrane Mark A, Bowman David Mjs, Moritz Max A, Kliskey Andrew D, Alessa Lilian, Hudak Andrew T, Hoffman Chad M, Lutz James A, Queen Lloyd P, Goetz Scott J, Higuera Philip E, Boschetti Luigi, Flannigan Mike, Yedinak Kara M, Watts Adam C, Strand Eva K, van Wagtendonk Jan W, Anderson John W, Stocks Brian J, Abatzoglou John T
Alistair M.S. Smith (
Bioscience. 2016 Feb 1;66(2):130-146. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv182. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Wildland fire management has reached a crossroads. Current perspectives are not capable of answering interdisciplinary adaptation and mitigation challenges posed by increases in wildfire risk to human populations and the need to reintegrate fire as a vital landscape process. Fire science has been, and continues to be, performed in isolated "silos," including institutions (e.g., agencies versus universities), organizational structures (e.g., federal agency mandates versus local and state procedures for responding to fire), and research foci (e.g., physical science, natural science, and social science). These silos tend to promote research, management, and policy that focus only on targeted aspects of the "wicked" wildfire problem. In this article, we provide guiding principles to bridge diverse fire science efforts to advance an integrated agenda of wildfire research that can help overcome disciplinary silos and provide insight on how to build fire-resilient communities.
野外火灾管理已到了一个十字路口。当前的观点无法应对野火风险增加给人类带来的跨学科适应和缓解挑战,以及将火灾重新纳入至关重要的景观过程的需求。火灾科学一直以来,并且仍在孤立的“筒仓”中进行,包括机构(如机构与大学)、组织结构(如联邦机构的任务规定与地方和州的火灾应对程序)以及研究重点(如物理科学、自然科学和社会科学)。这些“筒仓”往往会推动仅关注“棘手”野火问题的某些特定方面的研究、管理和政策。在本文中,我们提供指导原则,以弥合不同的火灾科学工作,推进野火研究的综合议程,这有助于克服学科壁垒,并就如何建设抗火社区提供见解。