Suppr超能文献

停止筛查:时机与方式?

Stopping screening, when and how?

作者信息

Hugosson Jonas

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):46-53. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.39.

Abstract

Screening for prostate cancer (PC) is still controversial despite randomized trials has found that PC mortality is decreased. The major concern is the high rate of over-diagnosis and subsequent harms that may follow in many men who never would have had any symptoms during life-time if not screened. The high rate of over-diagnosis is driven by the large reservoir of small non-significant cancers that increases with age and found in more than half of men over 70 years, the low specificity of prostate specific antigen (PSA) but also by current "blind" biopsy technique that risk accidentally to hit these small non-significant cancers. The risk of over-diagnosis is increasing with age and the trade-off by screening men in high age is probably higher. At what age harms exceeds benefits is not established but modelling studies has demonstrated that after 65-70 years the quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained are decreasing but still on the positive side if screening is continued up to 75 years. A dilemma is that most PC deaths occur in men after the age 80 and the effect of screening seems not to last as long as was thought, already 10 years after termination of screening PC mortality has caught up in the screening arm to a level similar to that in the control group. In the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) screening was terminated between 71 and 75 years and the first effect of screening on mortality was discernible after 7 years and has been relatively stable around 20% since 9 years after study start. It seems questionable from any standpoint to invite men for screening with an expected life length below 10 years, which is the expected life-length of an averaged 78-year-old man in 2018. However, the balance between harms and benefits specifically in the age 70-80 need more attention as also costs need. Permanent side-effects from (unnecessary) treatments and their impact on quality of life must be evaluated better and related to age and individual variations. In future better screening methods with more specific markers and introduction of imaging will hopefully decrease the present large risk of over-diagnosis in elderly men and thereby expand efficient screening to men in the age group >70 who actually is the high risk group of dying from PC.

摘要

尽管随机试验发现前列腺癌(PC)死亡率有所下降,但前列腺癌筛查仍存在争议。主要担忧在于过度诊断率高,以及许多男性若未接受筛查在其一生中本不会出现任何症状,却可能因此遭受后续伤害。过度诊断率高的原因包括大量微小的非显著性癌症,其数量随年龄增长而增加,在70岁以上男性中超过半数都能发现;前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的低特异性;以及当前的“盲目”活检技术,该技术有意外穿刺到这些微小非显著性癌症的风险。过度诊断的风险随年龄增加,对高龄男性进行筛查的利弊权衡可能更大。危害超过益处的年龄尚未确定,但模型研究表明,65 - 70岁之后获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs)在减少,但如果持续筛查至75岁,仍为正值。一个困境是,大多数前列腺癌死亡发生在80岁以上男性中,而且筛查的效果似乎不像之前认为的那样持久,在筛查终止10年后,筛查组的前列腺癌死亡率已赶上对照组的水平。在欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)中,筛查在71至75岁之间终止,筛查对死亡率的首个影响在7年后显现,自研究开始9年后一直相对稳定在20%左右。从任何角度来看,邀请预期寿命低于10年的男性进行筛查似乎都值得怀疑,这是2018年平均78岁男性的预期寿命。然而,70 - 80岁人群中危害与益处的平衡,以及成本问题都需要更多关注。(不必要)治疗带来的永久性副作用及其对生活质量的影响必须得到更好的评估,并与年龄和个体差异相关联。未来,具有更特异性标志物的更好筛查方法以及影像学检查的引入,有望降低目前老年男性中过度诊断的巨大风险,从而将有效的筛查扩展到70岁以上的男性群体,他们实际上是死于前列腺癌的高危人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9581/5861277/630fd4ae54c7/tau-07-01-46-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验