Ateschrang A, Eggensperger F, Ahrend M D, Schröter S, Stöckle U, Kraus Tobias M
BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
AO Research Institute, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jun;138(6):835-842. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2921-1. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to report on the functional outcome after both open and arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair in normal weight, pre-obese and obese patients. It was hypothesized that obesity is a negative prognostic factor for clinical outcome and failure for the RC repair.
One hundred and forty-six patients who underwent either open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2006 and 2010 were included in this study. Seventy-five patients (56.7 ± 10.1 years of age) after open RC repair and 71 patients (59.0 ± 9.1 years of age) treated arthroscopically were available for evaluation. In both groups a double-row reconstruction was performed. Patients were divided in three groups according to their body-mass index. The mean follow-up was at 43 ± 16 (minimum 24) months. At follow-up, the clinical outcome was assessed by the DASH and Constant score. An ultrasound of both shoulders was performed in all patients.
The mean BMI was 28.3 ± 5.3 in the arthroscopic group and 27.7 ± 4.3 in the open group. Overall, in both groups similar clinical results were noted [Constant-Murley score 78.3 ± 18.2 arthroscopic vs. 77.0 ± 21.8 for open surgery; DASH 12.7 ± 18.2 arthroscopic vs. 15.6 ± 21.6 for open surgery (p = 0.81)]. Both the failure rate and the clinical outcome were significantly worse for obese patients (BMI > 30, p = 0.007). The failure rate was 15.8% for the normal-weight patients, 8.2% in the pre-obese group and in the obese group 28.6%. The RC repair failure occurred in 11 cases in both groups after arthroscopic or open treatment (15.0%).
Both the arthroscopic and the open approach showed equivalent clinical results and failure rates. Obesity (BMI > 30) causes less favorable results in the Constant and DASH scores and showed higher re-tear rates.
本回顾性研究旨在报告正常体重、肥胖前期和肥胖患者行开放性和关节镜下肩袖(RC)修复术后的功能结果。研究假设肥胖是肩袖修复临床结果和失败的负面预后因素。
本研究纳入了2006年至2010年间接受开放性或关节镜下肩袖修复的146例患者。75例行开放性肩袖修复的患者(年龄56.7±10.1岁)和71例行关节镜治疗的患者(年龄59.0±9.1岁)可供评估。两组均采用双排重建。根据体重指数将患者分为三组。平均随访时间为43±16(最短24)个月。随访时,通过DASH和Constant评分评估临床结果。对所有患者的双肩进行超声检查。
关节镜组的平均BMI为28.3±5.3,开放组为27.7±4.3。总体而言,两组的临床结果相似[关节镜手术的Constant-Murley评分为78.3±18.2,开放手术为77.0±21.8;关节镜手术的DASH评分为12.7±18.2,开放手术为15.6±21.6(p=0.81)]。肥胖患者(BMI>30,p=0.007)的失败率和临床结果均明显更差。正常体重患者的失败率为15.8%,肥胖前期组为8.2%,肥胖组为28.6%。关节镜或开放治疗后两组均有11例肩袖修复失败(15.0%)。
关节镜和开放手术方法显示出相当的临床结果和失败率。肥胖(BMI>30)导致Constant和DASH评分结果较差,再撕裂率较高。