Sandler Alexis B, Green Clare K, Scanaliato John P, Fares Austin B, Dunn John C, Parnes Nata
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso County, Texas.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Apr 18;9(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00047. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
Given the rising prevalence of obesity, the number of patients with obesity undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) will likely increase; however, there have been mixed results in the existing literature with regard to the effect of elevated body mass index (BMI) on functional outcomes and complications.
The patient-reported outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, range of motion, and adverse events.
Fourteen studies (118,331 patients) were included. There were significant decreases in VAS pain scores for both patients with obesity (mean difference, -3.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), -3.9 to -3.7]; p < 0.001) and patients without obesity (mean difference, -3.2 [95% CI, -3.3 to -3.1]; p < 0.001). There were also significant increases in ASES scores for both patients with obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 22.5 to 26.1]; p < 0.001) and patients without obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 21.4 to 26.0]; p < 0.001). There were also significant increases in ASES scores for both patients with obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 22.5 to 26.1]; p < 0.001) and patients without obesity (mean difference, 24.3 [95% CI, 21.4 to 26.0]; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in final VAS pain scores, ASES scores, or range of motion between the groups. The mean rates of complications were higher among patients with obesity (1.2% ± 1.7%) than among patients without obesity (0.59% ± 0.11%) (p < 0.0001), and the mean rates of postoperative admissions were also higher among patients with obesity (5.9%) than patients without obesity (3.7%) (p < 0.0001). Although the mean rates of reoperation were similar between groups (5.2% ± 2.8% compared with 5.2% ± 4.2%), the meta-analysis revealed lower odds of reoperation in patients without obesity (odds ratio [OR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.82]).
No significant or clinically important differences in postoperative pain, ASES scores, or range of motion were found between patients with and without obesity following arthroscopic RCR. However, populations with obesity had higher rates of complications, postoperative admissions, and reoperation following arthroscopic RCR.
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
鉴于肥胖症患病率不断上升,接受关节镜下肩袖修复术(RCR)的肥胖患者数量可能会增加;然而,现有文献中关于体重指数(BMI)升高对功能结局和并发症的影响存在不同结果。
患者报告的结局指标包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分、活动范围和不良事件。
纳入了14项研究(118331例患者)。肥胖患者(平均差值,-3.8 [95%置信区间(CI),-3.9至-3.7];p < 0.001)和非肥胖患者(平均差值,-3.2 [95%CI,-3.3至-3.1];p < 0.001)的VAS疼痛评分均显著降低。肥胖患者(平均差值,24.3 [95%CI,22.5至26.1];p < 0.001)和非肥胖患者(平均差值,24.3 [95%CI,21.4至26.0];p < 0.001)的ASES评分也均显著升高。然而,两组之间最终的VAS疼痛评分、ASES评分或活动范围没有显著差异。肥胖患者的并发症平均发生率(1.2%±1.7%)高于非肥胖患者(0.59%±0.11%)(p < 0.0001),肥胖患者的术后住院平均发生率(5.9%)也高于非肥胖患者(3.7%)(p < 0.0001)。尽管两组之间再次手术的平均发生率相似(5.2%±2.8%与5.2%±4.2%),但荟萃分析显示非肥胖患者再次手术的几率较低(比值比[OR],0.76 [95%CI,0.71至0.82])。
关节镜下RCR术后,肥胖患者与非肥胖患者在术后疼痛、ASES评分或活动范围方面未发现显著或具有临床意义的差异。然而,肥胖人群在关节镜下RCR术后的并发症、术后住院和再次手术发生率较高。
预后II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。