Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, 3rd Floor Faculty Office Tower, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1504-1511. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4408-8. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
The transition to later-life caregiving roles, especially for couples caring for each other, can be rife with ambiguity. The incident discordance in spousal perceptions of one another's role and its relationship to mental health outcomes have not been well-described.
(1) To describe the range of daily agreement between older adult spouses' perceptions of care given and care received; (2) to explore associations between caregiving agreement and daily caregiver depression, anxiety, and marital satisfaction; and (3) to evaluate differential effects for male and female caregivers.
Cross-sectional, ecological assessment (daily diary).
Sample of 191 couples aged 60-64 (total 5196 daily surveys) drawn from the longitudinal Life and Family Legacies study.
During 2011-2012, spouses independently completed 14 consecutive daily surveys about their mood, marital interactions, and support exchanges. Caregiving agreement was defined as the daily ratio of spouse-reported care received to self-reported care given. Using generalized linear mixed effect modeling, we examined associations between spousal care agreement and outcomes of depression, anxiety, and marital satisfaction.
Sample data demonstrated broad variability in spousal agreement, with couples exhibiting substantial disagreement on nearly one-third of couple days (780/2598 days). On days where care was exchanged, higher caregiving agreement was associated with lower caregiver depression (p < 0.01) and anxiety (p < 0.01) in male caregivers, and higher marital satisfaction (p = 0.03) in female caregivers. When care recipients reported receiving more support than their spouse reported giving, these associations did not persist.
Findings suggest that spousal agreement about the amount of care given and received varies broadly and is an important consideration for primary care providers who counsel these patients day-to-day. Furthermore, agreement appears to predict mental health and relationship outcomes and should be further evaluated in this growing population of mid-to-late life adults emerging into caregiving.
从晚年护理角色转变,尤其是配偶之间相互护理,可能充满不确定性。配偶双方对彼此角色的看法不一致,以及这种不一致与心理健康结果之间的关系,尚未得到很好的描述。
(1)描述老年配偶对彼此提供和接受的护理的看法在日常范围内的一致性程度;(2)探讨护理一致性与日常护理者抑郁、焦虑和婚姻满意度之间的关系;(3)评估男性和女性护理者之间的差异影响。
横断面,生态评估(日常日记)。
来自纵向生活和家庭遗产研究的 191 对年龄在 60-64 岁的夫妇(共 5196 份日常调查)。
在 2011-2012 年期间,配偶双方独立完成了 14 项连续的日常调查,内容涉及他们的情绪、婚姻互动和支持交流。护理一致性定义为配偶报告的护理接受与自我报告的护理提供的日常比率。我们使用广义线性混合效应模型,检验了配偶护理一致性与抑郁、焦虑和婚姻满意度的关系。
样本数据显示配偶之间的一致性存在广泛的差异,在近三分之一的夫妻日(780/2598 天)中,夫妻双方存在很大的分歧。在交换护理的日子里,较高的护理一致性与男性护理者的抑郁(p<0.01)和焦虑(p<0.01)较低有关,与女性护理者的婚姻满意度(p=0.03)较高有关。当护理接受者报告收到的支持比配偶报告的给予的支持多时,这些关联就不存在了。
研究结果表明,配偶双方对提供和接受的护理量的一致性差异很大,这对每天为这些患者提供咨询的初级保健提供者来说是一个重要的考虑因素。此外,这种一致性似乎可以预测心理健康和关系结果,应该在这个不断增长的中老年人护理群体中进一步评估。