Gao Michael C, Martin Paul B, Motal Julius, Gingras Laura F, Chai Christina, Maikoff Megan E, Sarkisian Alex M, Rosenthal Nadine, Eiss Brian M
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (Drs Gao, Martin, Gingras, Chai, Rosenthal, and Eiss, Mr Motal, and Ms Maikoff); Department of Medicine (Drs Gao, Martin, Gingras, Chai, and Eiss), Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine (Drs Gao and Martin), Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Ambulatory Medicine (Drs Gingras and Eiss), and Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine (Dr Eiss), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; and Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana (Dr Sarkisian).
Qual Manag Health Care. 2018 Apr/Jun;27(2):63-68. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000168.
To design and implement a discharge timeout checklist, and to assess its effects on patients' understanding as well as the potential impact on preventable medical errors surrounding hospital discharges to home.
Based on the structure successfully used for surgical procedures and using the Model for Improvement framework, we designed a discharge checklist to review and assess patients' understanding of discharge medications, catheters, home care plans, follow-up, symptoms, and who to call with problems after discharge. In parallel, we developed a process of integrating the checklist into the discharge process after routine discharge procedures were completed. We used the checklists to assess patients' level of understanding and need for additional education as well as changes in discharge documentation; we also noted whether good catches of significant errors in the discharge process occurred.
Over 6 months of study, 190 discharge timeouts out of 429 eligible discharges were completed. Additional education was provided in 53 of 190 discharge timeouts (27.8%), with 62% of this education being related to medications. Twenty-one (11.1%) discharge timeouts resulted in at least one change to the discharge documentation or a good catch.
A multidisciplinary discharge timeout directly involving the patient can be effective in targeting additional areas for patient education and in potentially reducing preventable adverse events.
设计并实施一份出院超时检查表,评估其对患者理解情况的影响以及对围绕出院回家的可预防医疗差错的潜在影响。
基于成功用于外科手术的结构,并采用改进模型框架,我们设计了一份出院检查表,以审查和评估患者对出院用药、导管、家庭护理计划、随访、症状以及出院后出现问题时应联系何人等方面的理解。同时,我们制定了一个在常规出院程序完成后将检查表纳入出院流程的过程。我们使用检查表评估患者的理解水平和额外教育需求以及出院文件的变化;我们还记录了出院过程中重大差错是否被有效发现。
在6个月的研究期间,429例符合条件的出院病例中完成了190例出院超时检查。190例出院超时检查中有53例(27.8%)提供了额外教育,其中62%的教育与用药有关。21例(11.1%)出院超时检查导致出院文件至少有一处更改或有效发现了差错。
直接让患者参与的多学科出院超时检查在确定患者额外教育的其他领域以及潜在减少可预防不良事件方面可能是有效的。