• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 2 型糖尿病患者的三重达标相关的长期结局。

Long-term outcomes associated with triple-goal achievement in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

机构信息

Department of Global Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, United States.

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, United States.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;140:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.013
PMID:29596940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7183394/
Abstract

AIMS

This study was designed to compare the risk of long-term health outcomes, including microvascular, macrovascular complications and mortality, across 4 cohorts: triple-goal, dual-goal, single-goal, and no-goal achievers.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 53,120 patients with T2DM were identified (97.51% male, 61.49% whites) from the Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic medical records VISN 16 data warehouse (2004-2010). Propensity score weight (PSW) was used to balance demographic characteristics and complication history at baseline. The PSW adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) from Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare complications and all-cause mortality over an average of 4 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline, 25.43% (13,507) patients achieved triple-goal, while 41.36% (21,972) and 26.37% (14,010) patients achieved dual-goal and single-goal, respectively. During the follow-up period, triple-goal achievement was associated with risk reductions of complications and all-cause mortality when compared to all other groups of achieving dual or single-goal. Across different combinations of dual-goal achievement, the cohort with LDL-C goal achievement had lower risk of complication events and mortality, compared to those that achieved other goals but failed to reach LDL-C goal.

CONCLUSIONS

Achievement of triple-goal was associated with better health outcomes among veterans with T2DM compared to those that did not, while LDL-C has more weight of influence. Multi-faceted treatment strategies targeting hypertension, hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia may improve health outcome in veterans with T2DM.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较 4 个队列的长期健康结果风险,包括微血管、大血管并发症和死亡率:三目标达标组、双目标达标组、单目标达标组和无目标达标组。

方法

从退伍军人事务部(VA)电子病历 VISN 16 数据仓库(2004-2010 年)中确定了 53120 名 T2DM 患者的回顾性队列(97.51%为男性,61.49%为白人)。使用倾向评分权重(PSW)来平衡基线时的人口统计学特征和并发症史。使用 Cox 比例风险模型的 PSW 调整后的风险比(aHR)来比较平均 4 年随访期间的并发症和全因死亡率。

结果

在基线时,25.43%(13507)名患者达到了三目标,而 41.36%(21972)和 26.37%(14010)名患者分别达到了双目标和单目标。在随访期间,与其他双目标或单目标达标组相比,三目标达标与并发症和全因死亡率风险降低相关。在不同的双目标达标组合中,与其他目标达标但未达到 LDL-C 目标的患者相比,达到 LDL-C 目标的患者并发症事件和死亡率风险较低。

结论

与未达标者相比,T2DM 退伍军人达到三目标与更好的健康结果相关,而 LDL-C 具有更大的影响权重。针对高血压、高血糖和高血脂的多方面治疗策略可能会改善 T2DM 退伍军人的健康结果。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes associated with triple-goal achievement in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).与 2 型糖尿病患者的三重达标相关的长期结局。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;140:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
2
Clinical and economic benefits associated with the achievement of both HbA1c and LDL cholesterol goals in veterans with type 2 diabetes.与 2 型糖尿病退伍军人的 HbA1c 和 LDL 胆固醇目标达标相关的临床和经济效益。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3297-304. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0149. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
3
Optimizing treatment goals for long-term health outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.优化 2 型糖尿病患者的长期健康结局治疗目标。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Oct;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002396.
4
Glycemic and Cholesterol Control Versus Single-Goal Control in US Veterans with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study.美国新诊断 2 型糖尿病退伍军人的血糖和胆固醇控制与单一目标控制的比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2015 Sep;6(3):339-55. doi: 10.1007/s13300-015-0122-2. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
5
Intensification with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, insulin, or thiazolidinediones and risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and severe hypoglycemia in patients on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy: A retrospective cohort study.在二甲双胍-磺酰脲类双重疗法的患者中,强化使用二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰岛素或噻唑烷二酮类药物与全因死亡率、心血管疾病和严重低血糖的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 26;16(12):e1002999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002999. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Effects on clinical outcomes of intensifying triple oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy by initiating insulin versus enhancing OAD therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide population-based, propensity-score-matched cohort study.强化三重口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)治疗对 2 型糖尿病患者临床结局的影响:一项全国范围内基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究。起始胰岛素与增强 OAD 治疗。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Feb;21(2):312-320. doi: 10.1111/dom.13525. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
Important differences in the durability of glycaemic response among second-line treatment options when added to metformin in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍基础上加用二线治疗方案时血糖反应耐久性的重要差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2016;48(4):224-34. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2016.1157263. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Effect of Achieved Systolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.基于人群的回顾性队列研究:实现的收缩压对 2 型糖尿病患者心血管结局的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1134-1141. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2443. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Usefulness of morning home blood pressure measurements in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a 10-year, prospective, longitudinal study.2 型糖尿病患者清晨家庭血压测量的作用:一项为期 10 年的前瞻性纵向研究结果。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2015;37(2):122-7. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2014.913606. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Bariatric surgery is associated with a reduction in major macrovascular and microvascular complications in moderately to severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.减重手术与 2 型糖尿病伴中重度肥胖患者的主要大血管和微血管并发症减少相关。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):545-56; discussion 556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to Treatment Guidelines Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Attending a Tertiary Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达一家三级医院的2型糖尿病患者对治疗指南的依从性
Cureus. 2024 Nov 17;16(11):e73850. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73850. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Impact of metabolic control on all-cause mortality in a nationwide cohort of patients with diabetes from Colombia.哥伦比亚全国糖尿病患者队列中代谢控制对全因死亡率的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 19;14:1073833. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1073833. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of the value of conventional and unconventional lipid parameters for predicting the risk of diabetes in a non-diabetic population.评价常规和非常规血脂参数在预测非糖尿病人群糖尿病风险中的价值。
J Transl Med. 2022 Jun 11;20(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03470-z.
4
Medical assistant health coaching ("MAC") for type 2 diabetes in diverse primary care settings: A pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial protocol.医学助理健康辅导(“MAC”)在多样化初级保健环境中用于 2 型糖尿病:一项实用、群组随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jan;100:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106164. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
5
Role of social and other determinants of health in the effect of a multicomponent integrated care strategy on type 2 diabetes mellitus.社会和其他健康决定因素在多组分综合护理策略对 2 型糖尿病影响中的作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 May 24;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01188-2.
6
Using the BRAVO Risk Engine to Predict Cardiovascular Outcomes in Clinical Trials With Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors.使用 BRAVO 风险引擎预测钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂临床试验中的心血管结局。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1530-1536. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0227. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
7
Impact of the 2019 European Guidelines on Diabetes in Clinical Practice: Real and Simulated Analyses of Lipid Goals.《2019年欧洲糖尿病临床实践指南的影响:血脂目标的实际与模拟分析》
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2020 Feb 5;7(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jcdd7010006.
8
Does the Encounter Type Matter When Defining Diabetes Complications in Electronic Health Records?在电子健康记录中定义糖尿病并发症时,就诊类型重要吗?
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S53-S59. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001297.
9
Associations of ABC (Hemoglobin A1c, Blood Pressure and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) Goal Achievement With Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Preserved Kidney Function.2型糖尿病且肾功能正常患者中ABC(糖化血红蛋白、血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇)目标达成与慢性肾脏病的关联
J Clin Med Res. 2019 Dec;11(12):818-824. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4001. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
10
Factors associated with glycemic control in community-dwelling elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Zhejiang, China: a cross-sectional study.中国浙江社区 2 型糖尿病老年患者血糖控制的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0384-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes.依折麦布联合他汀类药物治疗急性冠脉综合征。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2387-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1410489. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
2
Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events.依洛尤单抗降低血脂和心血管事件的疗效和安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1500-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500858. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
3
Health care resource utilization and costs during episodes of care for type 2 diabetes mellitus-related comorbidities.2型糖尿病相关合并症护理期间的医疗资源利用和成本
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 May-Jun;29(4):529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
4
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2015: summary of revisions.《2015年糖尿病医疗护理标准:修订摘要》
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38 Suppl:S4. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S003.
5
Follow-up of blood-pressure lowering and glucose control in type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者的血压降低和血糖控制的随访。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1392-406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407963. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
6
Novel determinants preventing achievement of major cardiovascular targets in type 2 diabetes.阻碍2型糖尿病实现主要心血管目标的新决定因素。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2014 Jul-Sep;8(3):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2014.04.037. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
7
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.2014年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014.
8
2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).2014 年成人高血压管理的循证指南:第八届联合国家委员会(JNC 8)任命的专家组报告。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
9
Benchmarking is associated with improved quality of care in type 2 diabetes: the OPTIMISE randomized, controlled trial.基准评估与改善2型糖尿病的护理质量相关:OPTIMISE随机对照试验
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3388-95. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1853. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
10
Clinical and economic benefits associated with the achievement of both HbA1c and LDL cholesterol goals in veterans with type 2 diabetes.与 2 型糖尿病退伍军人的 HbA1c 和 LDL 胆固醇目标达标相关的临床和经济效益。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3297-304. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0149. Epub 2013 Jun 25.