Corresponding author: Lizheng Shi,
Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3297-304. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0149. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
This study compared the clinical and economic benefits associated with dual-goal achievement, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)<7% (53 mmol/mol) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)<100 mg/dL, with achievement of only the LDL-C goal or only the HbA1c goal in veterans with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated electronic medical records (Veterans Integrated Service Network 16) in adult T2DM patients with two or more measurements of LDL-C and HbA1c between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2010 (N=75,646). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare microvascular and cardiovascular outcomes by goal achievement status; generalized linear regression models were used to assess diabetes-related resource utilization (hospitalization days and number of outpatient visits) and medical service costs.
Relative to achievement of only the LDL-C goal, dual-goal achievement was associated with lower risk of microvascular complications (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.79), acute coronary syndrome (0.88), percutaneous coronary intervention (0.78), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (0.74); it was also associated with fewer hospitalization days (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 0.93) and outpatient visits (0.88), as well as lower diabetes-related annual medical costs (-$130.89). Compared with achievement of only the HbA1c goal, dual-goal achievement was associated with lower risk of the composite cardiovascular-related end point (aHR 0.87) and CABG (aHR 0.62), as well as fewer outpatient visits (aIRR 0.98).
Achieving both HbA1c and LDL-C goals in diabetes care is associated with additional clinical and economic benefits, as compared with the achievement of either goal alone.
本研究比较了 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)退伍军人同时实现双重目标(糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)<7%(53mmol/mol)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)<100mg/dL)与仅实现 LDL-C 目标或仅实现 HbA1c 目标的临床和经济效益。
本回顾性队列分析评估了 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 6 月 30 日期间,在 Veterans Integrated Service Network 16 电子病历中具有两次或多次 LDL-C 和 HbA1c 测量值的成年 T2DM 患者(N=75646)。使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了按目标实现情况的微血管和心血管结局;使用广义线性回归模型评估了糖尿病相关资源利用(住院天数和门诊就诊次数)和医疗服务费用。
与仅实现 LDL-C 目标相比,双重目标的实现与微血管并发症风险降低相关(校正后的危险比[aHR]0.79)、急性冠状动脉综合征(0.88)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(0.78)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)(0.74);还与住院天数减少(校正发病率比[aIRR]0.93)和门诊就诊次数减少(0.88)以及糖尿病相关年度医疗费用降低(-$130.89)相关。与仅实现 HbA1c 目标相比,双重目标的实现与心血管相关复合终点(aHR 0.87)和 CABG(aHR 0.62)风险降低以及门诊就诊次数减少(aIRR 0.98)相关。
与仅实现 HbA1c 或 LDL-C 目标相比,在糖尿病治疗中同时实现 HbA1c 和 LDL-C 目标与额外的临床和经济效益相关。