• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control: The Buffering Effect of Autonomy Support From Important Family Members and Friends.糖尿病困扰与血糖控制:来自重要家庭成员和朋友的自主支持的缓冲作用。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1157-1163. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2396. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
2
Diabetes self-management and glycemic control: The role of autonomy support from informal health supporters.糖尿病自我管理和血糖控制:非正式健康支持者提供自主支持的作用。
Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;38(2):122-132. doi: 10.1037/hea0000710.
3
Autonomy support from informal health supporters: links with self-care activities, healthcare engagement, metabolic outcomes, and cardiac risk among Veterans with type 2 diabetes.非专业健康支持者的自主支持:与 2 型糖尿病退伍军人的自我护理活动、医疗保健参与、代谢结果和心脏风险的关系。
J Behav Med. 2021 Apr;44(2):241-252. doi: 10.1007/s10865-020-00196-5. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Psychological distress, self-efficacy and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者的心理困扰、自我效能与血糖控制
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Apr;27(4):300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
5
Influencing Pathways to Quality of Life and HbA1c in Patients With Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study That Inform Evidence-Based Practice.影响糖尿病患者生活质量和 HbA1c 的途径:一项为循证实践提供信息的纵向研究。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Apr;15(2):104-112. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12275. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
Diabetes Distress Among Dyads of Patients and Their Health Supporters: Links With Functional Support, Metabolic Outcomes, and Cardiac Risk.患者及其健康支持者之间的糖尿病困扰:与功能支持、代谢结果和心脏风险的关系。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Oct 4;55(10):949-955. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa081.
7
Out-of-home informal support important for medication adherence, diabetes distress, hemoglobin A1c among adults with type 2 diabetes.对于 2 型糖尿病患者,非家庭非正式支持对药物依从性、糖尿病困扰、糖化血红蛋白水平很重要。
J Behav Med. 2019 Jun;42(3):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-0002-0. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
8
Variation in perceived competence, glycemic control, and patient satisfaction: relationship to autonomy support from physicians.感知能力、血糖控制及患者满意度的差异:与医生自主性支持的关系
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Apr;57(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.04.001.
9
Self-reported diabetes self-management competence and support from healthcare providers in achieving autonomy are negatively associated with diabetes distress in adults with Type 1 diabetes.自我报告的糖尿病自我管理能力以及医疗服务提供者在实现自主性方面提供的支持,与1型糖尿病成年患者的糖尿病困扰呈负相关。
Diabet Med. 2015 Nov;32(11):1513-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12818. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
10
Diabetes Distress, Depression and Glycemic Control in a Canadian-Based Specialty Care Setting.加拿大专科医疗环境下的糖尿病困扰、抑郁与血糖控制。
Can J Diabetes. 2017 Aug;41(4):362-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.11.006. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative analysis of family experiences across diabetes-specific family functioning types during a family-focused intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes.对2型糖尿病成年患者进行以家庭为中心的干预期间,针对特定糖尿病家庭功能类型的家庭经历的定性分析。
J Behav Med. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00594-7.
2
Effectiveness of a theory-based tailored individual and family self-management education in adults with uncontrolled diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.基于理论的个性化定制的个体及家庭自我管理教育对血糖控制不佳的成年糖尿病患者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2025 Jul 10;12(4):320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.06.001. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Patient and Carer Understandings and Experiences of Living With Type 2 Diabetes in India.印度2型糖尿病患者及照顾者的生活认知与体验
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70229. doi: 10.1111/hex.70229.
4
Examining Share plus-A Continuous Glucose Monitoring Plus Data-Sharing Intervention in Older Adults and Their Care Partners: Protocol for a Randomized Control Study.评估“共享加”——一项针对老年人及其护理伙伴的持续血糖监测加数据共享干预措施:一项随机对照研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 16;13:e60004. doi: 10.2196/60004.
5
Diabetes-specific family functioning typology associated with intervention engagement and effects: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial.与干预参与度及效果相关的糖尿病特异性家庭功能类型:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae070.
6
Understanding Experiences of Diabetes Distress: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.理解糖尿病困扰的体验:系统评价和主题综合。
J Diabetes Res. 2024 Nov 14;2024:3946553. doi: 10.1155/2024/3946553. eCollection 2024.
7
Psychological Predictors of Adherence to Self-Care Behaviour amongst Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Visiting Public Hospital, North India.印度北部公立医院2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者自我护理行为依从性的心理预测因素
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Nov-Dec;26(6):558-564. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_116_22. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
8
Social support as perceived, provided and needed by family-members of migrants with type 2 diabetes - a qualitative study.移民 2 型糖尿病患者家属感知到的、提供的和需要的社会支持 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):1612. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19101-9.
9
The moderating role of diabetes distress on the effect of a randomized eHealth intervention on glycemic control in Black adolescents with type 1 diabetes.糖尿病困扰对随机电子健康干预对1型糖尿病黑人青少年血糖控制效果的调节作用。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2024 Aug 1;49(8):538-546. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae033.
10
Older Chinese and Filipino American Immigrants with Type 2 Diabetes and their Adult Child: A Qualitative Dyadic Exploration of Family Support.中国老年移民和菲律宾裔美国移民 2 型糖尿病患者及其成年子女:家庭支持的定性对偶探索。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2024 Jun;39(2):151-172. doi: 10.1007/s10823-024-09505-w. Epub 2024 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Erratum. Glycemic Targets. Sec. 6. In . Diabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl. 1);S48-S56.勘误。血糖目标。第6节。载于《糖尿病护理》2017年;40(增刊1);S48 - S56。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):985. doi: 10.2337/dc17-er07a. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
Stress and A1c Among People with Diabetes Across the Lifespan.糖尿病患者一生中的压力与糖化血红蛋白水平
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Aug;16(8):67. doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0761-3.
3
Understanding the Links Between Social Support and Physical Health: A Life-Span Perspective With Emphasis on the Separability of Perceived and Received Support.理解社会支持与身体健康之间的联系:一个强调感知支持和接受支持可分离性的生命周期视角。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):236-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x.
4
Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.2型糖尿病的糖尿病自我管理教育与支持:美国糖尿病协会、美国糖尿病教育者协会以及营养与饮食学会联合立场声明
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Aug;41(4):417-30. doi: 10.1177/0145721715588904. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
5
Longitudinal relationship between diabetes-specific emotional distress and follow-up HbA1c in adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.1型糖尿病成年患者中糖尿病特异性情绪困扰与随访糖化血红蛋白之间的纵向关系。
Diabet Med. 2015 Oct;32(10):1304-10. doi: 10.1111/dme.12781. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
Achieving glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a critical comparison of current options.老年2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:当前治疗方案的关键比较
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Nov 18;9:1963-80. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S53482. eCollection 2014.
7
The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: a call for greater clarity and precision.糖尿病患者中抑郁与痛苦的复杂故事:呼吁更加清晰和精准。
Diabet Med. 2014 Jul;31(7):764-72. doi: 10.1111/dme.12428.
8
Diabetes burden and diabetes distress: the buffering effect of social support.糖尿病负担与糖尿病困扰:社会支持的缓冲作用
Ann Behav Med. 2014 Oct;48(2):145-55. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9585-4.
9
Self-reported discrimination, diabetes distress, and continuous blood glucose in women with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病女性的自我报告的歧视、糖尿病困扰与连续血糖水平
J Immigr Minor Health. 2015 Apr;17(2):566-73. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9948-8.
10
Importance of family/social support and impact on adherence to diabetic therapy.家庭/社会支持的重要性及其对糖尿病治疗依从性的影响。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013 Nov 6;6:421-6. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S36368.

糖尿病困扰与血糖控制:来自重要家庭成员和朋友的自主支持的缓冲作用。

Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control: The Buffering Effect of Autonomy Support From Important Family Members and Friends.

机构信息

VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI

VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1157-1163. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2396. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

DOI:10.2337/dc17-2396
PMID:29599295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5961390/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether autonomy support (defined as social support for an individual's personal agency) for diabetes management from informal health supporters (family/friends) reduces the detrimental effects of diabetes distress on glycemic control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Three hundred eight veterans with type 2 diabetes and one or more risk factors for diabetes complications completed a survey that included measures of diabetes distress and perceived autonomy support from their main informal health supporter. Hemoglobin A (HbA) data from 12 months before and after the survey were extracted from electronic medical records. Linear mixed modeling examined the main effects and interaction of autonomy support and diabetes distress on repeated measures of HbA over the 12 months after the survey, controlling for mean prior 12-month HbA, time, insulin use, age, and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Diabetes distress ( = 0.12 [SE 0.05]; = 0.023) was associated with higher and autonomy support ( = -0.16 [SE 0.07]; = 0.032) with lower subsequent HbA levels. Autonomy support moderated the relationship between diabetes distress and HbA ( = -0.13 [SE 0.06]; = 0.027). Greater diabetes distress was associated with higher HbA at low ( = 0.21 [SE 07]; = 0.002) but not high ( = 0.01 [SE 0.07]; = 0.890) levels of autonomy support.

CONCLUSIONS

Autonomy support from main health supporters may contribute to better glycemic control by ameliorating the effects of diabetes distress. Interventions that reduce diabetes distress and enhance the autonomy supportiveness of informal supporters may be effective approaches to improving glycemic control.

摘要

目的

探讨来自非正式健康支持者(家庭/朋友)的糖尿病管理自主支持(定义为对个人自主的社会支持)是否可以减轻糖尿病困扰对血糖控制的不利影响。

研究设计和方法

308 名 2 型糖尿病退伍军人和 1 个或多个糖尿病并发症风险因素患者完成了一项调查,其中包括糖尿病困扰和主要非正式健康支持者感知的自主支持的测量。从电子病历中提取调查前 12 个月和调查后 12 个月的血红蛋白 A(HbA)数据。线性混合模型检验了自主支持和糖尿病困扰对调查后 12 个月 HbA 的重复测量的主要影响和交互作用,同时控制了前 12 个月 HbA 的平均值、时间、胰岛素使用、年龄和种族/民族。

结果

糖尿病困扰( = 0.12 [SE 0.05]; = 0.023)与 HbA 水平升高相关,而自主支持( = -0.16 [SE 0.07]; = 0.032)与 HbA 水平降低相关。自主支持调节了糖尿病困扰与 HbA 之间的关系( = -0.13 [SE 0.06]; = 0.027)。在低自主支持水平( = 0.21 [SE 07]; = 0.002)而非高自主支持水平( = 0.01 [SE 0.07]; = 0.890)时,糖尿病困扰与 HbA 升高更相关。

结论

来自主要健康支持者的自主支持可能通过改善糖尿病困扰的影响,有助于更好地控制血糖。减少糖尿病困扰和增强非正式支持者的自主支持性的干预措施可能是改善血糖控制的有效方法。