• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解糖尿病困扰的体验:系统评价和主题综合。

Understanding Experiences of Diabetes Distress: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

机构信息

Department of Health Research, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AT, UK.

出版信息

J Diabetes Res. 2024 Nov 14;2024:3946553. doi: 10.1155/2024/3946553. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/3946553
PMID:39574786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11581805/
Abstract

Diabetes distress is a common emotional issue for those living with diabetes, which has the potential to negatively impact well-being, management behaviors, and HbA1c levels. These implications have led to diabetes distress becoming an important consideration in diabetes healthcare and management. Nonetheless, discussions remain ongoing on how to best conceptualize this experience. Recent research has attempted to enhance conceptualization by considering the underlying emotional mechanisms that may underpin the highly contextualized experience of diabetes distress. Qualitative insights can further add to these understandings; however, the research in this remit is yet to be systematically reviewed. This review therefore sought to add to the growing body of literature attempting to better conceptualize diabetes distress and the underlying mechanisms that may contribute to this experience. A secondary aim was to leverage this understanding to consider ways to improve patient-healthcare interactions. A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis was undertaken. Eligible studies were identified through PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases from November 2020 to May 2021. Study quality was assessed using the McMaster Critical Review Form. Nineteen papers were included in the review. The analysis resulted in seven descriptive themes which contributed to three analytical themes: (1) threatened autonomy, (2) sense of helplessness, and (3) negative sense of self. These results highlight that a major area underpinning experiences of diabetes distress is not feeling in control. Consideration should be given to how psychological factors, such as locus of control and learned helplessness, may constitute underlying mechanisms impacting emotional regulation in those experiencing diabetes distress. Clinicians should consider including and leading discussions around distress during appointments, as well as using approaches that promote patient autonomy and empowerment.

摘要

糖尿病困扰是糖尿病患者常见的情绪问题,可能对幸福感、管理行为和 HbA1c 水平产生负面影响。这些影响导致糖尿病困扰成为糖尿病医疗保健和管理的一个重要考虑因素。尽管如此,关于如何最好地概念化这种体验的讨论仍在继续。最近的研究试图通过考虑潜在的情绪机制来增强概念化,这些机制可能是糖尿病困扰这种高度情境化体验的基础。定性见解可以进一步增加对这些理解的认识;然而,这一领域的研究尚未得到系统审查。因此,本综述旨在为不断增长的文献提供补充,试图更好地概念化糖尿病困扰以及可能导致这种体验的潜在机制。次要目的是利用这种理解来考虑如何改善患者与医疗保健提供者的互动。本研究采用定性系统评价和主题综合方法进行。从 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 5 月,通过 PsycINFO、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 EMBASE 数据库,确定了符合条件的研究。使用麦克马斯特批判性评论表格评估研究质量。综述共纳入 19 篇论文。分析结果产生了七个描述性主题,这些主题对三个分析性主题做出了贡献:(1)自主权受到威胁;(2)无助感;(3)消极的自我感。这些结果表明,糖尿病困扰体验的一个主要支撑领域是感觉无法控制。应该考虑心理因素(如控制源和习得性无助)如何构成影响经历糖尿病困扰者情绪调节的潜在机制。临床医生应考虑在预约期间包括并引导围绕困扰的讨论,并采用促进患者自主性和赋权的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a1b/11581805/fb57d69007bd/JDR2024-3946553.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a1b/11581805/26192062bcfd/JDR2024-3946553.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a1b/11581805/fb57d69007bd/JDR2024-3946553.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a1b/11581805/26192062bcfd/JDR2024-3946553.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a1b/11581805/fb57d69007bd/JDR2024-3946553.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding Experiences of Diabetes Distress: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.理解糖尿病困扰的体验:系统评价和主题综合。
J Diabetes Res. 2024 Nov 14;2024:3946553. doi: 10.1155/2024/3946553. eCollection 2024.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.女性更年期经历:定性证据的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):250-337. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1948.
6
A Spectrum of Understanding: A Qualitative Exploration of Autistic Adults' Understandings and Perceptions of Friendship(s).理解的光谱:对自闭症成年人对友谊的理解与认知的质性探索
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):438-450. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0051. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of the Relationship Between Psychological (In)flexibility and Living with and Managing Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.心理(不)灵活性与1型和2型糖尿病患者的生活及管理之间关系的范围综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;15(6):792. doi: 10.3390/bs15060792.
2
Current treatment guidelines and glycated haemoglobin goals for type 2 diabetes: Which patients are most likely to benefit from fixed-ratio basal insulin glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist combinations?2型糖尿病的现行治疗指南及糖化血红蛋白目标:哪些患者最有可能从基础胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的固定比例联合治疗中获益?
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27 Suppl 7:3-13. doi: 10.1111/dom.16502. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Antenatal depression among women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的产前抑郁:一项初步研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 19;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01374-1.
2
Diabetes distress, emotional regulation, HbA in people with diabetes and A controlled pilot study of an emotion-focused behavioral therapy intervention in adults with type 2 diabetes.糖尿病困扰、情绪调节、糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白以及一项针对成年2型糖尿病患者的以情绪为中心的行为疗法干预的对照试验研究
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Jun;16(3):381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
Locus of control moderates the association of COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: results of a Norwegian and a German-speaking cross-sectional survey.
控制源调节了 COVID-19 压力与一般心理困扰之间的关联:一项挪威语和德语跨截面调查的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03418-5.
4
Emotional Regulation and Diabetes Distress in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.情绪调节与 1 型和 2 型糖尿病成人的糖尿病困扰
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(1):20-25. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1059. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
Adults With Diabetes Distress Often Want to Talk With Their Health Professionals About It: Findings From an Audit of 4 Australian Specialist Diabetes Clinics.糖尿病困扰的成年人通常希望与他们的医疗保健专业人员讨论这个问题:对 4 家澳大利亚专科糖尿病诊所的审计结果。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Aug;44(6):473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
6
Perceptions of healthcare professionals and people with type 2 diabetes on emotional support: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员和2型糖尿病患者对情感支持的看法:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2020 May 1;4(1). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101018. Print 2020.
7
Twenty-five years of diabetes distress research.糖尿病困扰研究 25 年。
Diabet Med. 2020 Mar;37(3):393-400. doi: 10.1111/dme.14157. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
'Diabetes is a gift from god' a qualitative study coping with diabetes distress by Indonesian outpatients.“糖尿病是上帝的恩赐”:一项定性研究印尼门诊患者如何应对糖尿病困扰。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):109-125. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02299-2. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
9
When qualitative data contradict quantitative data: diabetes distress in the Chinese-Canadian community.当定性数据与定量数据矛盾时:加拿大华人社区的糖尿病困扰。
Diabet Med. 2020 Jun;37(6):963-970. doi: 10.1111/dme.14129. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
10
Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment.互动中的自主性:患者自主性的维度与治疗不依从性
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 14;10:1857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01857. eCollection 2019.