Abinaya K, Muthu Kumar B, Ahila S C
Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):60-64. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_747_17.
To compare and evaluate the surface quality of silicone impression materials after ozone water disinfection.
A total of 60 samples were prepared on a stainless steel die (American Dental Association specification no. 19 and International Standard of Organization - 4823). The samples were divided into four groups; each group contains 15 samples. Group A as control, Group B, C, and D disinfected with 2% glutaraldehyde, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, and ozone water, respectively. The samples were made according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the samples were allowed to set in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 35°C ± 1°C and retrieved after 10 min. The surface qualities of the samples were measured in stereomicroscope with ×20 magnification.
The data obtained were analyzed using Chi-square test, and the "" value was calculated. The results showed that there were no differences in the surface quality among the Groups A, C, and D for addition silicone putty and light body and medium body impression materials than the Group B.
This study concluded that ozone water disinfection showed least changes when compared to 5.25%sodium hypochloride and 2% glutaraldehyde disinfection for addition silicone putty , light body and medium body impression materials.
比较和评估臭氧水消毒后硅橡胶印模材料的表面质量。
在不锈钢模具(美国牙科协会规格第19号和国际标准化组织-4823)上制备60个样本。样本分为四组;每组包含15个样本。A组为对照组,B组、C组和D组分别用2%戊二醛、5.25%次氯酸钠和臭氧水消毒。样本按照制造商的说明制作,并在35°C±1°C的恒温水浴中凝固,10分钟后取出。在放大20倍的体视显微镜下测量样本的表面质量。
使用卡方检验分析获得的数据,并计算“”值。结果表明,对于加成型硅橡胶腻子、轻体和中体印模材料,A组、C组和D组的表面质量与B组相比没有差异。
本研究得出结论,对于加成型硅橡胶腻子、轻体和中体印模材料,与5.25%次氯酸钠和2%戊二醛消毒相比,臭氧水消毒引起的变化最小。