Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (Drs Raj, Zhang, and Wade, Ms Shultz, and Mr Zang); Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Raj); University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (Ms Shultz, Mr Zang, and Dr Wade); Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Dr Kirkwood); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs Taylor and Stancin); Biobehavioral Health Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Taylor); and MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Stancin); and University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Dr Yeates).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):E19-E29. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000388.
To examine the effects of a Web-based parenting intervention (I-InTERACT), and an abbreviated version (Express), on caregiver depression, psychological distress, parenting stress, and parenting efficacy following pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Four children's hospitals and 1 general hospital in the United States.
148 caregivers of 113 children aged 3 to 9 years with a moderate to severe TBI.
Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to I-InTERACT, Express, or an active control condition. Caregiver data were collected at baseline and postintervention (6 months later).
I-InTERACT (10-14 sessions) and Express (7 sessions) combine live coaching of parenting skills and positive parenting strategies.
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D); Global Severity Index of the Symptom Checklist-90-R (GSI), Parenting Stress Index (PSI), and Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES).
Analyses revealed no main effects of treatment on caregiver distress (GSI), parenting stress (PSI), or parenting efficacy (CSES). However, analyses examining baseline severity as a moderator found that caregivers with elevated levels of depression in I-InTERACT experienced significantly greater reductions in CES-D scores compared with caregivers in the active control condition.
I-InTERACT reduced caregiver depression but no other facets of caregiver psychological functioning. Modifications to the treatment content may be necessary to reduce parenting stress and improve caregiver efficacy.
考察基于网络的育儿干预(I-InTERACT)和其简化版(Express)对儿科创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后照顾者抑郁、心理困扰、育儿压力和育儿效能的影响。
美国四家儿童医院和一家综合医院。
113 名年龄在 3 至 9 岁的中度至重度 TBI 儿童的 148 名照顾者。
多中心随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到 I-InTERACT、Express 或积极对照条件。在基线和干预后(6 个月后)收集照顾者数据。
I-InTERACT(10-14 节)和 Express(7 节)结合了育儿技能的现场指导和积极的育儿策略。
流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D);症状清单-90-R 的全球严重程度指数(GSI),育儿压力指数(PSI)和照顾者自我效能感量表(CSES)。
分析显示治疗对照顾者痛苦(GSI)、育儿压力(PSI)或育儿效能(CSES)没有主要影响。然而,检查基线严重程度作为调节因素的分析发现,I-InTERACT 中抑郁程度较高的照顾者与积极对照条件下的照顾者相比,CES-D 评分显著降低。
I-InTERACT 降低了照顾者的抑郁,但没有改善其他照顾者心理功能的方面。可能需要对治疗内容进行修改,以降低育儿压力和提高照顾者效能。