• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心开发用于植入式心脏复律除颤器更换的决策辅助工具:一项混合方法研究。

User-centered Development of a Decision Aid for Patients Facing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement: A Mixed-Methods Study.

机构信息

Krystina B. Lewis, MN, RN PhD candidate, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, and Registered Nurse, University of Ottawa Health Institute, Ontario, Canada. David Birnie, MD Director of Arrhythmia Service, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada. Sandra L. Carroll, PhD, RN Associate Professor, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Lorraine Clark, MHS, RN Clinical Manager, Clinical Services, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada. Freya Kelly, MN, RN Registered Nurse, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada. Paul Gibson Patient Partner, Health Consumer, Ottawa, Canada. Lloyd Rockburn Patient Partner, Health Consumer, Ottawa, Canada. Louise Rockburn Patient Partner, Health Consumer, Ottawa, Canada. Dawn Stacey, PhD, RN Professor, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, and Senior Scientist, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):481-491. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000477.

DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000477
PMID:29601374
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of battery depletion, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator requires surgical replacement every 5 to 7 years. Routine replacement is the norm without discussion with patients about whether or not to proceed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a patient decision aid (PDA) for patients facing ICD replacement and plan for its implementation.

METHODS

An embedded mixed-methods study was conducted using questionnaires and semistructured interviews focused on current ICD replacement practices; PDA acceptability, usability, and content; and PDA implementation. Transcripts were analyzed using constant comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen PDA end users in 16 interviews characterized the current ICD replacement approach as automatic without consideration for patient preferences. The PDA was positively received, and the content was iteratively revised 4 times during the interviews. Changes were related to missing and excess information, language, and wording. The PDA was identified as a means to support a shared decision-making (SDM) process, not to be used as a standalone instrument. To shift current practices to an SDM process, participants identified that an invitation to discuss the option of ICD replacement is required-whether initiated by the patient or the clinician.

CONCLUSION

Currently, the option of ICD replacement is rarely offered, and patient preferences are seldom elicited. Participants believed the PDA to be a useful intervention that could help facilitate an SDM process for patients facing ICD replacement. Preparing for implementation during the development phase will allow us to strategize effectively to overcome perceived barriers and capitalize on perceived facilitators during actual implementation.

摘要

背景

由于电池耗尽,植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 发生器每 5 到 7 年需要进行手术更换。在没有与患者讨论是否继续进行的情况下,常规更换是标准做法。

目的

本研究旨在为面临 ICD 更换的患者开发一种患者决策辅助工具 (PDA),并计划实施该工具。

方法

采用问卷调查和半结构式访谈相结合的嵌入式混合方法研究,重点关注当前 ICD 更换实践;PDA 的可接受性、可用性和内容;以及 PDA 的实施。使用恒定比较分析对转录本进行分析。

结果

16 次访谈中有 18 名 PDA 最终用户,他们将当前的 ICD 更换方法描述为自动进行,而没有考虑患者的偏好。PDA 受到了积极的评价,并且在访谈过程中对内容进行了 4 次迭代修改。变化与缺失和多余的信息、语言和措辞有关。PDA 被确定为支持共同决策 (SDM) 过程的一种手段,而不是作为独立的工具使用。为了将当前实践转变为 SDM 过程,参与者认为需要邀请患者或临床医生讨论 ICD 更换的选项。

结论

目前,很少提供 ICD 更换的选项,也很少征求患者的偏好。参与者认为 PDA 是一种有用的干预措施,可以帮助面临 ICD 更换的患者促进 SDM 过程。在开发阶段为实施做准备将使我们能够有效地制定策略,以克服实施过程中感知到的障碍,并利用感知到的促进因素。

相似文献

1
User-centered Development of a Decision Aid for Patients Facing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement: A Mixed-Methods Study.以患者为中心开发用于植入式心脏复律除颤器更换的决策辅助工具:一项混合方法研究。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):481-491. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000477.
2
A Relational Approach to Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacement: An Integrative Review of the Role of Nursing in Shared Decision-Making.植入式心脏复律除颤器发生器更换的关系方法:护理在共同决策中作用的综合综述
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Summer;24(3):6-14.
3
A multicenter trial of a shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients offered implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE-ICD rationale, design, Medicare changes, and pilot data.一项针对接受植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的共享决策支持干预的多中心试验:DECIDE-ICD 的原理、设计、医疗保险变化和试点数据。
Am Heart J. 2020 Aug;226:161-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
Experiences Implementing a Suite of Decision Aids for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Qualitative Insights From the DECIDE-ICD Trial.植入式心脏复律除颤器决策辅助工具套件的实施经验:来自 DECIDE-ICD 试验的定性见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Nov;15(11):e009352. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009352. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Refusing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Replacement in Elderly Persons-The Same as Giving Up Life: A Qualitative Study.拒绝为老年人更换植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)——等同于放弃生命:一项定性研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Nov;38(11):1275-86. doi: 10.1111/pace.12702. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Development and piloting of four decision aids for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in different media formats.开发并试用了四种不同媒体格式的植入式心脏除颤器决策辅助工具。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Nov;44(11):1842-1852. doi: 10.1111/pace.14365. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
7
Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者临终时的决策制定:家庭成员的经历
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul;34(6):518-523. doi: 10.1177/1049909116641622. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
Incorporating patients' preference diagnosis in implantable cardioverter defibrillator decision-making: a review of recent literature.将患者偏好诊断纳入植入式心脏复律除颤器决策:近期文献综述
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2018 Jan;33(1):42-49. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000464.
9
Decision Support for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.植入式心脏复律除颤器更换的决策支持:一项初步可行性随机对照试验
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(2):143-150. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000694.
10
Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Perspectives Regarding Generator Exchanges of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.患者对植入式心脏复律除颤器的发电机更换的看法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Aug;16(8):509-518. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009827. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
The development of a decision aid for shared decision making in the Dutch implantable cardioverter defibrillator patient population: A novel approach to patient education.荷兰植入式心脏复律除颤器患者群体中用于共同决策的决策辅助工具的开发:一种患者教育的新方法。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 13;9:946404. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.946404. eCollection 2022.
3
Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures and Arrhythmia Management.
心脏电生理程序和心律失常管理中的共同决策。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;14(12):e007958. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.007958. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
4
Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.系统开发患者决策辅助工具:来自 IPDAS 合作组织的最新更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):736-754. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211014163. Epub 2021 Jun 19.