• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.
2
Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study.影响马来西亚公共卫生诊所胰岛素患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244645. eCollection 2020.
3
What will make patients use a patient decision aid? A qualitative study on patients' perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.什么会促使患者使用患者决策辅助工具?一项关于患者对实施障碍和促进因素看法的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):755-764. doi: 10.1111/jep.13161. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
Mismatch between health-care professionals' and patients' views on a diabetes patient decision aid: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员与患者对糖尿病患者决策辅助工具看法的差异:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):427-36. doi: 10.1111/hex.12366. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
5
Using a patient decision aid for insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative analysis of doctor-patient conversations in primary care consultations in Malaysia.在2型糖尿病患者中使用胰岛素起始治疗患者决策辅助工具:马来西亚基层医疗会诊中医患对话的定性分析
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e014260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014260.
6
Cultural adaptation of a patient decision-aid for insulin therapy.胰岛素治疗患者决策辅助工具的文化调适。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e033791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033791.
7
How do health care professionals assess patients when initiating insulin therapy? A qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员在开始胰岛素治疗时如何评估患者?一项定性研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2014 Apr;8(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
8
Factors influencing implementation of a computerized, individualized, culturally tailored lupus decision aid in lupus clinics: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.影响狼疮诊所中使用计算机化、个体化、文化适应的狼疮决策辅助工具的因素:一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2793-2801. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04643-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Factors influencing young men's decision to undergo health screening in Malaysia: a qualitative study.影响马来西亚年轻男性进行健康筛查决策的因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 10;7(3):e014364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014364.
10
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.超越利弊 - 开发患者决策辅助工具以培养对话建立关系:来自定性研究和决策辅助工具开发的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid for patients with type 2 diabetes in an academic primary care clinic in Malaysia: a mixed method study.马来西亚一家学术性初级保健诊所中2型糖尿病患者胰岛素患者决策辅助工具实施情况的评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12588-x.
2
Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.2型糖尿病中的共同决策:对患者偏好和医疗服务提供者观点的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12160-z.
3
Examining cancer patient preferences during three stages of decision making and family involvement: a multicenter survey study in China.在中国进行的一项多中心调查研究:考察癌症患者在三个决策阶段的偏好及家庭参与情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02846-z.
4
Developing an implementation intervention, and identifying strategies for integrating health innovations in routine practice: A case study of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid.制定实施干预措施,并确定将健康创新融入常规实践的策略:以实施胰岛素患者决策辅助工具为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0310654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310654. eCollection 2024.
5
A scoping review, novel taxonomy and catalogue of implementation frameworks for clinical decision support systems.临床决策支持系统实施框架的范围综述、新分类法和目录。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02739-1.
6
A Voice-Annotated Digital Decision Aid to Promote Child Influenza Vaccination: A Feasibility Study.一种促进儿童流感疫苗接种的语音注释数字决策辅助工具:一项可行性研究。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;11(3):565. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030565.
7
Development of a Patient Decision Aid to Help People Living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.开发一种患者决策辅助工具以帮助炎症性肠病患者。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2022 Jan;14(1):57-63. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.256. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
8
Decision aids for cancer survivors' engagement with survivorship care services after primary treatment: a systematic review.癌症幸存者在初级治疗后参与生存护理服务的决策辅助工具:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr;18(2):288-317. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01230-y. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
9
Barriers and facilitators to patient-centred care in pharmacy consultations: A qualitative study with Malaysian hospital pharmacists and patients.药剂咨询中以患者为中心的护理的障碍和促进因素:一项对马来西亚医院药剂师和患者的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0258249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258249. eCollection 2021.
10
A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗凝治疗的患者决策辅助工具:开发与初步研究
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Aug 12;5(2):e23464. doi: 10.2196/23464.

本文引用的文献

1
Training health professionals in shared decision making: Update of an international environmental scan.对卫生专业人员进行共同决策培训:国际环境扫描更新
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1753-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
2
Ten Years, Forty Decision Aids, And Thousands Of Patient Uses: Shared Decision Making At Massachusetts General Hospital.十年,四十种决策辅助工具,以及数千次患者使用:麻省总医院的共同决策
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):630-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1376.
3
Patient involvement in decision-making: a cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic.患者参与决策:马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 4;6(1):e010063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063.
4
Decision Aid Use in Primary Care: An Overview and Theory-Based Framework.基层医疗中决策辅助工具的应用:概述与基于理论的框架
Fam Med. 2015 Oct;47(9):679-92.
5
Can consumers learn to ask three questions to improve shared decision making? A feasibility study of the ASK (AskShareKnow) Patient-Clinician Communication Model(®) intervention in a primary health-care setting.消费者能否学会提出三个问题以改善共同决策?在初级卫生保健环境中对ASK(询问、分享、知晓)医患沟通模型(®)干预措施的可行性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1160-8. doi: 10.1111/hex.12409. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Shared decision-making in the People's Republic of China: current status and future directions.中华人民共和国的共同决策:现状与未来方向。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Aug 6;9:1129-41. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S82110. eCollection 2015.
7
Towards informed decisions on breast cancer screening: Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for Chinese women.迈向关于乳腺癌筛查的明智决策:一项针对中国女性的决策辅助工具的开发与试点测试
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Aug;98(8):961-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
8
Implementation of a cystic fibrosis lung transplant referral patient decision aid in routine clinical practice: an observational study.在常规临床实践中实施囊性纤维化肺移植转诊患者决策辅助工具:一项观察性研究。
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 7;10:17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0206-4.
9
Enablers and barriers to using patient decision aids in early stage breast cancer consultations: a qualitative study of surgeons' views.早期乳腺癌会诊中使用患者决策辅助工具的促进因素和障碍:外科医生观点的定性研究
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 29;9:174. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0174-0.
10
Primary healthcare system and practice characteristics in Singapore.新加坡的基层医疗保健系统及实践特点。
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2014 Jul 19;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12930-014-0008-x. eCollection 2014.

影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。

Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.

作者信息

Tong Wen Ting, Lee Yew Kong, Ng Chirk Jenn, Lee Ping Yein

机构信息

Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9
PMID:28327157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5361724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most studies on barriers and facilitators to implementation of patient decision aids (PDAs) are conducted in the west; hence, the findings may not be transferable to developing countries. This study aims to use a locally developed insulin PDA as an exemplar to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing PDAs in Malaysia, an upper middle-income country in Asia.

METHODS

Qualitative methodology was adopted. Nine in-depth interviews (IDIs) and three focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with policymakers (n = 6), medical officers (n = 13), diabetes educators (n = 5) and a nurse, who were involved in insulin initiation management at an academic primary care clinic. The interviews were conducted with the aid of a semi-structured interview guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

Five themes emerged, and they were lack of shared decision-making (SDM) culture, role boundary, lack of continuity of care, impact on consultation time and reminder network. Healthcare providers' (HCPs) paternalistic attitude, patients' passivity and patient trust in physicians rendered SDM challenging which affected the implementation of the PDA. Clear role boundaries between the doctors and nurses made collaborative implementation of the PDA challenging, as nurses may not view the use of insulin PDA to be part of their job scope. The lack of continuity of care might cause difficulties for doctors to follow up on insulin PDA use with their patient. While time was the most commonly cited barrier for PDA implementation, use of the PDA might reduce consultation time. A reminder network was suggested to address the issue of forgetfulness as well as to trigger interest in using the PDA. The suggested reminders were peer reminders (i.e. HCPs reminding one another to use the PDA) and system reminders (e.g. incorporating electronic medical record prompts, displaying posters/notices, making the insulin PDA available and visible in the consultation rooms).

CONCLUSIONS

When implementing PDAs, it is crucial to consider the healthcare culture and system, particularly in developing countries such as Malaysia where concepts of SDM and PDAs are still novel.

摘要

背景

大多数关于患者决策辅助工具(PDA)实施障碍与促进因素的研究在西方开展;因此,研究结果可能无法应用于发展中国家。本研究旨在以当地开发的胰岛素PDA为例,探索在亚洲中高收入国家马来西亚实施PDA的障碍与促进因素。

方法

采用定性研究方法。对参与学术初级保健诊所胰岛素起始治疗管理的政策制定者(n = 6)、医务人员(n = 13)、糖尿病教育者(n = 5)和一名护士进行了9次深度访谈(IDI)和3次焦点小组讨论(FGD)。访谈借助基于理论领域框架的半结构化访谈指南进行。访谈进行了录音,逐字转录,并采用主题分析法进行分析。

结果

出现了五个主题,分别是缺乏共同决策(SDM)文化、角色界限、护理连续性不足、对咨询时间的影响以及提醒网络。医疗服务提供者(HCP)家长式的态度、患者的被动性以及患者对医生的信任使得SDM具有挑战性,进而影响了PDA的实施。医生和护士之间明确的角色界限使得PDA的协作实施具有挑战性,因为护士可能不认为使用胰岛素PDA是其工作范围的一部分。护理连续性不足可能导致医生难以跟进患者使用胰岛素PDA的情况。虽然时间是PDA实施中最常被提及的障碍,但使用PDA可能会减少咨询时间。建议建立一个提醒网络来解决遗忘问题,并激发对使用PDA的兴趣。建议的提醒方式包括同行提醒(即HCP相互提醒使用PDA)和系统提醒(例如纳入电子病历提示、展示海报/通知、在咨询室提供并展示胰岛素PDA)。

结论

在实施PDA时,考虑医疗文化和系统至关重要,特别是在马来西亚等发展中国家,SDM和PDA的概念仍然很新颖。