Dautartas Angela, Kenyhercz Michael W, Vidoli Giovanna M, Meadows Jantz Lee, Mundorff Amy, Steadman Dawnie Wolfe
Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, 502 Strong Hall, 1621 Cumberland Ave., Knoxville, TN, 37996.
Central Identification Laboratory, Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, 570 Moffet Street, JBPHH, HI, 96853.
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Nov;63(6):1673-1683. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13784. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
While nonhuman animal remains are often utilized in forensic research to develop methods to estimate the postmortem interval, systematic studies that directly validate animals as proxies for human decomposition are lacking. The current project compared decomposition rates among pigs, rabbits, and humans at the University of Tennessee's Anthropology Research Facility across three seasonal trials that spanned nearly 2 years. The Total Body Score (TBS) method was applied to quantify decomposition changes and calculate the postmortem interval (PMI) in accumulated degree days (ADD). Decomposition trajectories were analyzed by comparing the estimated and actual ADD for each seasonal trial and by fuzzy cluster analysis. The cluster analysis demonstrated that the rabbits formed one group while pigs and humans, although more similar to each other than either to rabbits, still showed important differences in decomposition patterns. The decomposition trends show that neither nonhuman model captured the pattern, rate, and variability of human decomposition.
虽然非人类动物遗骸经常被用于法医研究,以开发估计死后间隔时间的方法,但缺乏直接验证动物可作为人类分解替代物的系统性研究。当前项目在田纳西大学人类学研究设施中,跨越近2年的三个季节性试验,比较了猪、兔和人类的分解速率。采用全身评分(TBS)方法量化分解变化,并以累积度日(ADD)计算死后间隔时间(PMI)。通过比较每个季节性试验的估计ADD和实际ADD以及模糊聚类分析来分析分解轨迹。聚类分析表明,兔子形成一组,而猪和人类虽然彼此之间比与兔子更相似,但在分解模式上仍存在重要差异。分解趋势表明,两种非人类模型都没有捕捉到人类分解的模式、速率和变异性。