Slezak Emily, Shevell Steven K
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2018 Apr 1;35(4):B85-B91. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.35.000B85.
In a classic study, Kovács et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93, 15508 (1996)PNASA60027-842410.1073/pnas.93.26.15508] used an array of many disks presented dichoptically with half of the disks in one eye "red" and the other half "green;" disk chromaticities in the fellow eye were reversed, resulting in binocular color rivalry for every disk, thus creating color ambiguity. Surprisingly, the binocularly fused percept sometimes was all disks of the same color (red or green), which showed that perceptual resolution of the many ambiguous neural representations did not rely completely on monocular dominance or on independent resolution for each disk. The present study replicates and expands on the original with the aim to isolate binocularly driven neural mechanisms of perceptual resolution without contamination from monocular dominance. Observers viewed a color-rivalrous array with 16 disks presented either steadily to each eye, as in Kovács et al., or with chromatic interocular-switch rivalry (CISR), which swaps the two images between the eyes every 133 ms. The total proportion of viewing time when the 16 disks were perceived to be all red or all green was measured. For three observers, the disks all appeared the same color more often with CISR than with steady rivalrous presentation, suggesting that monocular dominance interferes with grouped perceptual resolution of ambiguous stimuli in the Kovács paradigm. This conclusion was supported by an additional condition using CISR, but with every disk the same color in one eye at each instant (e.g., all "red" disks in one eye and all "green" in the other). This condition was never significantly different from the original CISR condition, as expected if CISR reveals only binocularly mediated perceptual resolution of the disks' color, irrespective of monocular neural representations. In conclusion, chromatically tuned binocularly driven neurons account for perceptual resolution of CISR.
在一项经典研究中,科瓦奇等人[《美国国家科学院院刊》93, 15508 (1996年)PNASA60027 - 842410.1073/pnas.93.26.15508]使用了一系列圆盘,以双眼分视的方式呈现,其中一半圆盘在一只眼睛中显示为“红色”,另一半为“绿色”;另一只眼睛中圆盘的色度则相反,这导致每个圆盘都出现双眼颜色竞争,从而产生颜色模糊性。令人惊讶的是,双眼融合感知有时是所有圆盘都为同一种颜色(红色或绿色),这表明对众多模糊神经表征的感知分辨率并非完全依赖于单眼优势或每个圆盘的独立分辨率。本研究重复并扩展了原始研究,旨在分离出由双眼驱动的感知分辨率神经机制,而不受单眼优势的影响。观察者观看一个由16个圆盘组成的颜色竞争阵列,这些圆盘要么像科瓦奇等人的研究那样稳定地呈现给每只眼睛,要么采用色度双眼切换竞争(CISR),即每133毫秒在两眼之间交换两幅图像。测量了16个圆盘被感知为全红或全绿时的总观看时间比例。对于三名观察者来说,与稳定的竞争呈现相比,采用CISR时圆盘更常全部呈现为同一种颜色,这表明在科瓦奇范式中,单眼优势会干扰对模糊刺激的分组感知分辨率。这一结论得到了使用CISR的另一个条件的支持,但在每个瞬间,每只眼睛中的每个圆盘颜色都相同(例如,一只眼睛中所有圆盘为“红色”,另一只眼睛中所有圆盘为“绿色”)。正如预期的那样,如果CISR仅揭示了圆盘颜色的双眼介导的感知分辨率,而与单眼神经表征无关,那么这个条件与原始的CISR条件从未有显著差异。总之,色度调谐的双眼驱动神经元负责CISR的感知分辨率。