• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

彩色刺激的双眼分视差异阈值。

Dichoptic difference thresholds for chromatic stimuli.

作者信息

Malkoc Gokhan, Kingdom Frederick A A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Dogus University, Zeamet Sok. No. 21, Acibadem, Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.018
PMID:22487719
Abstract

We have investigated the properties of binocular color vision using a new measure: the Dichoptic Color Difference Threshold (DCDT). The DCDT is the smallest detectable difference in color between two dichoptically superimposed stimuli. DCDTs differ from conventional measures of binocular rivalry in that they are performance--not appearance-based. The dependency of DCDTs on (a) color direction and (b) color contrast was measured. The colors (chromaticities) of the stimuli were defined according to a scaled version of the MacLeod-Boynton color space, and the luminance and color contrasts of the stimulus pairs were equated using a matching procedure. DCDTs were measured using a forced-choice procedure in which subjects had to chose which of two stimuli had a between-eye-difference in color. DCDTs ranged from 9° to 22° of color angle depending on color direction. DCDTs were lower than binocular rivalry thresholds but higher than thresholds for discriminating the color pairs when placed side-by-side. There were no minima at either the cardinal color or unique hues directions, suggesting that DCDTs are not mediated by these mechanisms. DCDTs were however positively correlated with the measured perceived color difference between the color pairs when placed side-by-side.

摘要

我们使用一种新方法——双眼分视颜色差异阈值(DCDT),研究了双眼颜色视觉的特性。DCDT是两个双眼分视叠加刺激之间可检测到的最小颜色差异。DCDT与双眼竞争的传统测量方法不同,因为它们基于表现而非外观。我们测量了DCDT对(a)颜色方向和(b)颜色对比度的依赖性。刺激的颜色(色度)根据麦克劳德 - 博因顿颜色空间的缩放版本定义,并且使用匹配程序使刺激对的亮度和颜色对比度相等。DCDT使用强制选择程序进行测量,在该程序中,受试者必须选择两个刺激中哪一个在两眼之间存在颜色差异。根据颜色方向,DCDT的颜色角度范围为9°至22°。DCDT低于双眼竞争阈值,但高于将颜色对并排放置时区分颜色对的阈值。在主要颜色或独特色调方向上均没有最小值,这表明DCDT不是由这些机制介导的。然而,当颜色对并排放置时,DCDT与测量的颜色对之间的感知颜色差异呈正相关。

相似文献

1
Dichoptic difference thresholds for chromatic stimuli.彩色刺激的双眼分视差异阈值。
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
2
Dichoptic difference thresholds for uniform color changes applied to natural scenes.
J Vis. 2009 Feb 5;9(2):3.1-12. doi: 10.1167/9.2.3.
3
Binocular rivalry between identical retinal stimuli with an induced color difference.具有诱发色差的相同视网膜刺激之间的双眼竞争。
Vis Neurosci. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):361-4. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080139. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
4
Detection of between-eye differences in color: Interactions with luminance.双眼间颜色差异的检测:与亮度的相互作用。
J Vis. 2016;16(3):23. doi: 10.1167/16.3.23.
5
Resolution of binocular rivalry: Perceptual misbinding of color.双眼竞争的解决:颜色的知觉错误结合。
Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):561-6. doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233145.
6
The effects of flankers on contrast detection and discrimination in binocular, monocular, and dichoptic presentations.侧翼刺激对双眼、单眼和双眼分视呈现中对比度检测和辨别能力的影响。
J Vis. 2010 Apr 27;10(4):13.1-15. doi: 10.1167/10.4.13.
7
The dynamics of cross-orientation masking at monocular and interocular sites.单眼和双眼部位的交叉取向掩蔽动态
Vision Res. 2015 Nov;116(Pt A):80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.09.008.
8
Cross-orientation masking in human color vision: application of a two-stage model to assess dichoptic and monocular sources of suppression.人类色觉中的交叉取向掩蔽:应用两阶段模型评估双眼和单眼抑制源。
J Vis. 2013 May 28;13(6):15. doi: 10.1167/13.6.15.
9
Investigation of color motion using MEG and binocular rivalry stimuli.使用脑磁图和双眼竞争刺激对颜色运动进行研究。
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov 30;2004:108.
10
Long-term effects of monocular deprivation revealed with binocular rivalry gratings modulated in luminance and in color.通过亮度和颜色调制的双眼竞争光栅揭示单眼剥夺的长期影响。
J Vis. 2013 May 1;13(6):1. doi: 10.1167/13.6.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding binocular color differences via EEG signals: linking ERP dynamics to chromatic disparity in CIELAB space.通过脑电信号解码双眼颜色差异:将事件相关电位动态与CIELAB空间中的色度差异相联系
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Sep 10;243(10):209. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07153-1.
2
Prefrontal cortex activity during binocular color fusion and rivalry: an fNIRS study.双眼颜色融合与竞争过程中的前额叶皮质活动:一项功能近红外光谱研究
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 14;16:1527434. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1527434. eCollection 2025.
3
Binocular luster elicited by isoluminant chromatic stimuli relies on mechanisms similar to those in the achromatic case.
同彩等亮度刺激诱发的双眼对比闪光依赖于与非彩觉情况类似的机制。
J Vis. 2024 Mar 1;24(3):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.3.7.
4
Investigating critical brain area for EEG-based binocular color fusion and rivalry with EEGNet.利用EEGNet研究基于脑电图的双眼颜色融合与竞争的关键脑区。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Feb 27;18:1361486. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1361486. eCollection 2024.
5
Detection of vertical interocular phase disparities using luster as cue.利用光泽作为线索检测垂直眼间相位差异。
J Vis. 2023 Jun 1;23(6):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.6.10.
6
A simple model of binocular luster.双眼光泽的简单模型。
J Vis. 2022 Sep 2;22(10):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.10.6.
7
Ocularity Feature Contrast Attracts Attention Exogenously.眼部特征对比度会外源性地吸引注意力。
Vision (Basel). 2018 Feb 24;2(1):12. doi: 10.3390/vision2010012.
8
Differences in Stereoscopic Luster Evoked by Static and Dynamic Stimuli.静态和动态刺激引起的立体光泽差异。
Iperception. 2019 May 17;10(3):2041669519846133. doi: 10.1177/2041669519846133. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.
9
At least two distinct mechanisms control binocular luster, rivalry, and perceived rotation with contrast and average luminance disparities.至少有两种不同的机制控制着双眼的亮度、竞争和感知旋转,包括对比度和平均亮度差异。
PLoS One. 2019 May 21;14(5):e0215716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215716. eCollection 2019.
10
Perceptual resolution of color for multiple chromatically ambiguous objects.多个色彩模糊物体的颜色感知分辨率
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2018 Apr 1;35(4):B85-B91. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.35.000B85.