Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Ås, 1432, Norway.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Ås, 1432, Norway.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jul;101(7):6232-6243. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13874. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
Mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy of milk was used to predict dry matter intake (DMI) and net energy intake (NEI) in 160 lactating Norwegian Red dairy cows. A total of 857 observations were used in leave-one-out cross-validation and external validation to develop and validate prediction equations using 5 different models. Predictions were performed using (multiple) linear regression, partial least squares (PLS) regression, or best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) methods. Linear regression was implemented using just milk yield (MY) or fat, protein, and lactose concentration in milk (Mcont) or using MY together with body weight (BW) as predictors of intake. The PLS and BLUP methods were implemented using just the MIR spectral information or using the MIR together with Mcont, MY, BW, or NEI from concentrate (NEIconc). When using BLUP, the MIR spectral wavelengths were always treated as random effects, whereas Mcont, MY, BW, and NEIconc were considered to be fixed effects. Accuracy of prediction (R) was defined as the correlation between the predicted and observed feed intake test-day records. When using the linear regression method, the greatest R of predicting DMI (0.54) and NEI (0.60) in the external validation was achieved when the model included both MY and BW. When using PLS, the greatest R of predicting DMI (0.54) and NEI (0.65) in the external validation data set was achieved when using both BW and MY as predictors in combination with the MIR spectra. When using BLUP, the greatest R of predicting DMI (0.54) in the external validation was when using MY together with the MIR spectra. The greatest R of predicting NEI (0.65) in the external validation using BLUP was achieved when the model included both BW and MY in combination with the MIR spectra or when the model included both NEIconc and MY in combination with MIR spectra. However, although the linear regression coefficients of actual on predicted values for DMI and NEI were not different from unity when using PLS, they were less than unity for some of the models developed using BLUP. This study shows that MIR spectral data can be used to predict NEI as a measure of feed intake in Norwegian Red dairy cattle and that the accuracy is augmented if additional, often available data are also included in the prediction model.
采用中红外(MIR)光谱法对牛奶进行分析,以预测 160 头挪威红牛泌乳奶牛的干物质采食量(DMI)和净能采食量(NEI)。在留一法交叉验证和外部验证中使用了 857 个观测值,使用 5 种不同模型开发和验证预测方程。使用(多元)线性回归、偏最小二乘(PLS)回归或最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)方法进行预测。线性回归仅使用产奶量(MY)或牛奶中的脂肪、蛋白质和乳糖浓度(Mcont)进行,或使用 MY 与体重(BW)作为摄入量的预测因子。PLS 和 BLUP 方法仅使用 MIR 光谱信息或 MIR 与 Mcont、MY、BW 或浓缩物中的 NEI(NEIconc)一起使用。使用 BLUP 时,MIR 光谱波长始终被视为随机效应,而 Mcont、MY、BW 和 NEIconc 则被视为固定效应。预测准确性(R)定义为预测和观察饲料摄入量测试日记录之间的相关性。使用线性回归方法时,当模型同时包含 MY 和 BW 时,对 DMI(0.54)和 NEI(0.60)的外部验证预测的 R 值最大。当使用 PLS 时,当模型同时使用 BW 和 MY 作为预测因子与 MIR 光谱相结合时,对 DMI(0.54)和 NEI(0.65)的外部验证数据集中的预测 R 值最大。当使用 BLUP 时,在外部验证中预测 DMI(0.54)的最大 R 值是在 MY 与 MIR 光谱一起使用时。使用 BLUP 时,外部验证中预测 NEI(0.65)的最大 R 值是当模型同时包含 BW 和 MY 并与 MIR 光谱结合时,或者当模型同时包含 NEIconc 和 MY 并与 MIR 光谱结合时。然而,尽管在使用 PLS 时 DMI 和 NEI 的实际对预测值的线性回归系数与 1 没有差异,但对于一些使用 BLUP 开发的模型,它们小于 1。本研究表明,MIR 光谱数据可用于预测挪威红牛奶牛的 NEI 作为饲料摄入量的衡量指标,如果在预测模型中还包含其他常用数据,则可以提高准确性。