• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

周期日、雌激素水平和主导卵泡大小:对 27790 个体外受精周期的分析,以确定促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的最佳起始标准。

Cycle day, estrogen level, and lead follicle size: analysis of 27,790 in vitro fertilization cycles to determine optimal start criteria for gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):633-637. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.021. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.021
PMID:29605403
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal criteria at which to start GnRH antagonists during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization (IVF).

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort.

SETTING

IVF clinics.

PATIENT(S): Women undergoing fresh autologous IVF using GnRH antagonist for ovulation suppression during COH.

INTERVENTION(S): Measurement of lead follicle size, E level, and cycle day of stimulation on day of antagonist initiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (PR).

RESULT(S): The highest clinical PR was achieved when the antagonist was started when a lead follicle reached 14-15.9 mm in size (mean clinical PR 21.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.3, 23.6) on cycle day 6 (mean clinical PR 22.2; 95% CI 17, 28.4), or when the E level was between 500 and 599 pg/mL (mean clinical PR 25.4; 95% CI 19.5, 32.4). Starting antagonists when the E level was <300 or >1,100 pg/mL reduced the odds of clinical pregnancy by 40% (odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.5, 0.7).

CONCLUSION(S): Cycle day, E level, and follicle size at time of antagonist start are all independent predictors of a clinical pregnancy after IVF. Initiating antagonists when the E level is extremely low (<300 pg/mL) or extremely high (>1,100 pg/mL) significantly reduces the odds of pregnancy.

摘要

目的

确定在控制性卵巢超刺激(COH)中开始使用 GnRH 拮抗剂进行体外受精(IVF)的最佳标准。

设计

回顾性临床队列研究。

设置

IVF 诊所。

患者

在 COH 期间使用 GnRH 拮抗剂抑制排卵的接受新鲜自体 IVF 的女性。

干预措施

测量拮抗剂起始日的主导卵泡大小、E 水平和刺激天数。

主要观察指标

临床妊娠率(PR)。

结果

当主导卵泡大小达到 14-15.9mm 时(平均临床 PR 21.3;95%置信区间 [CI] 19.3,23.6),或当 E 水平在 500-599pg/mL 之间时(平均临床 PR 22.2;95% CI 17,28.4),拮抗剂起始时获得的临床 PR 最高。当 E 水平 <300 或 >1,100pg/mL 时,开始使用拮抗剂会使临床妊娠的可能性降低 40%(优势比 0.60,95% CI 0.5,0.7)。

结论

拮抗剂起始时的周期天数、E 水平和卵泡大小都是 IVF 后临床妊娠的独立预测因素。当 E 水平极低(<300pg/mL)或极高(>1,100pg/mL)时开始使用拮抗剂会显著降低妊娠的可能性。

相似文献

1
Cycle day, estrogen level, and lead follicle size: analysis of 27,790 in vitro fertilization cycles to determine optimal start criteria for gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.周期日、雌激素水平和主导卵泡大小:对 27790 个体外受精周期的分析,以确定促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的最佳起始标准。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):633-637. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.021. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
2
Elevated early follicular progesterone levels and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a prospective intervention study and meta-analysis.卵泡早期孕酮水平升高与体外受精结局:一项前瞻性干预研究和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Aug;102(2):448-454.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
3
Is earlier administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) associated with the probability of pregnancy in cycles stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists? A prospective randomized trial.在使用重组卵泡刺激素和促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂刺激的周期中,较早给予人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)是否与妊娠的可能性相关?一项前瞻性随机试验。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1112-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.029. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
4
Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with "genuine" poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?对于“真正”对控制性卵巢过度刺激反应不良的患者,修改后的自然体外受精周期是否合理?
Fertil Steril. 2014 Jun;101(6):1624-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.036. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
5
Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial.黄体期雌二醇预处理的低反应者中延迟启动与传统促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案的比较:一项随机对照试验
Reprod Sci. 2015 Dec;22(12):1627-31. doi: 10.1177/1933719115590666. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
6
Does physicians' experience influence in vitro fertilization success in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists?医生的经验会影响接受GnRH拮抗剂控制性卵巢刺激的患者的体外受精成功率吗?
Fertil Steril. 2008 Mar;89(3):736-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.049. Epub 2007 May 11.
7
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in oocyte donors co-treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist: a dose-finding study.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂用于联合使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的卵母细胞捐赠者的扳机:一项剂量探索研究。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
8
Is the type of gonadotropin-releasing hormone suppression protocol for ovarian hyperstimulation associated with ectopic pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles for in vitro fertilization?促性腺激素释放激素抑制方案的类型是否与体外受精新鲜自体周期中的异位妊娠有关?
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):666-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.019. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.对于接受体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射治疗的不孕女性,在月经周期的不同阶段开始卵巢刺激时的灵活性。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):334-341.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
Tamoxifen co-administration during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization in breast cancer patients increases the safety of fertility-preservation treatment strategies.在乳腺癌患者体外受精的控制性卵巢刺激过程中联合使用他莫昔芬可提高生育力保留治疗策略的安全性。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Aug;102(2):488-495.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Elevated Oestrogen Levels on hCG Trigger Day on Clinical Pregnancy Outcome and OHSS Incidence in Long-Acting GnRHa Down-Regulated IVF/ICSI-ET Cycles.长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)降调节体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)周期中,雌激素水平升高对人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)扳机日临床妊娠结局及卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)发生率的影响
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Jul 14;17:2075-2084. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S520376. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationship Between Estradiol Levels Measured on the Initiation Day of GnRH Antagonist Treatment and Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Receiving the Antagonist Protocol.GnRHa拮抗剂方案治疗患者中,GnRHa拮抗剂治疗起始日测得的雌二醇水平与妊娠结局的关系。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 17;61(4):741. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040741.
3
Estradiol Decline Before hCG Administration in COH Has a Negative Effect on IVF Outcomes in Patients Without OC Pretreatment.在未进行口服避孕药预处理的患者中,控制性卵巢刺激(COH)过程中注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)前雌二醇水平下降对体外受精(IVF)结局有负面影响。
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Mar 6;16:411-419. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S423089. eCollection 2024.
4
Association between serum LH levels on hCG trigger day and live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations.在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案新鲜胚胎移植中,不同人群在 hCG 扳机日血清 LH 水平与活产率之间的关系。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 5;14:1191827. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1191827. eCollection 2023.
5
What is the optimal GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation during ART treatment? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.ART 治疗中卵巢刺激时最佳 GnRH 拮抗剂方案是什么?系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2023 May 2;29(3):307-326. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac040.
6
Optimizing estradiol level for gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist initiation among patients with simple tubal factor infertility.优化单纯输卵管因素不孕患者促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂起始时的雌二醇水平。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 9;13:915923. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.915923. eCollection 2022.
7
Low Serum LH Levels During Ovarian Stimulation With GnRH Antagonist Protocol Decrease the Live Birth Rate After Fresh Embryo Transfers but Have No Impact in Freeze-All Cycles.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案控制性卵巢刺激中血清 LH 水平低会降低新鲜胚胎移植后的活产率,但在全冷冻周期中无影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 23;12:640047. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.640047. eCollection 2021.