Suppr超能文献

微血管乳房重建术后加速康复的成本分析。

Cost analysis of enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction.

作者信息

Oh Christine, Moriarty James, Borah Bijan J, Mara Kristin C, Harmsen William S, Saint-Cyr Michel, Lemaine Valerie

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Jun;71(6):819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown in multiple surgical specialties to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS) after surgery. ERAS in breast reconstruction has been found to decrease hospital LOS and inpatient opioid use. ERAS protocols can facilitate a patient's recovery and can potentially increase the quality of care while decreasing costs.

METHODS

A standardized ERAS pathway was developed through multidisciplinary collaboration. It addressed all phases of surgical care for patients undergoing free-flap breast reconstruction utilizing an abdominal donor site. In this retrospective cohort study, clinical variables associated with hospitalization costs for patients who underwent free-flap breast reconstruction with the ERAS pathway were compared with those of historical controls, termed traditional recovery after surgery (TRAS). All patients included in the study underwent surgery between September 2010 and September 2014. Predicted costs of the study groups were compared using generalized linear modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were analyzed: 82 in the ERAS cohort and 118 in the TRAS cohort. Clinical variables that were identified to potentially affect costs were found to have a statistically significant difference between groups and included unilateral versus bilateral procedures (p = 0.04) and the need for postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.03). The cost regression analysis on the two cohorts was adjusted for these significant variables. Adjusted mean costs of patients with ERAS were found to be $4,576 lesser than those of the TRAS control group ($38,688 versus $43,264).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the ERAS pathway was associated with significantly decreased costs when compared to historical controls. There has been a healthcare focus toward prudent resource allocation, which dictates the need for plastic surgeons to recognize economic evaluation of clinical practice. The ERAS pathway can increase healthcare accountability by improving quality of care while simultaneously decreasing the costs associated with autologous breast reconstruction.

摘要

背景

多项外科专业研究表明,术后加速康复(ERAS)方案可缩短术后住院时间(LOS)。乳房重建领域的ERAS已被证实可缩短住院时间并减少住院期间阿片类药物的使用。ERAS方案有助于患者康复,可能提高护理质量并降低成本。

方法

通过多学科协作制定了标准化的ERAS方案。该方案涵盖了利用腹部供区进行游离皮瓣乳房重建患者手术护理的各个阶段。在这项回顾性队列研究中,将采用ERAS方案进行游离皮瓣乳房重建患者的住院费用相关临床变量与历史对照(即传统术后康复,TRAS)进行比较。研究纳入的所有患者均在2010年9月至2014年9月期间接受手术。使用广义线性模型比较研究组的预测成本。

结果

共分析了200例患者:ERAS队列82例,TRAS队列118例。发现可能影响成本的临床变量在两组之间存在统计学显著差异,包括单侧与双侧手术(p = 0.04)以及术后输血需求(p = 0.03)。对这两个队列的成本回归分析针对这些显著变量进行了调整。发现ERAS患者的调整后平均成本比TRAS对照组低4576美元(38688美元对43264美元)。

结论

与历史对照相比,实施ERAS方案与成本显著降低相关。医疗保健领域一直注重审慎的资源分配,这要求整形外科医生认识到临床实践的经济评估。ERAS方案可通过提高护理质量同时降低自体乳房重建相关成本来增强医疗保健的问责制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验