Simon Fraser University, Canada.
City University of New York, Queens College, USA.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):2-18. doi: 10.1177/0963662518761733. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
The growing presence of research shared on social media, coupled with the increase in freely available research, invites us to ask whether scientific articles shared on platforms like Twitter diffuse beyond the academic community. We explore a new method for answering this question by identifying 11 articles from two open access biology journals that were shared on Twitter at least 50 times and by analyzing the follower network of users who tweeted each article. We find that diffusion patterns of scientific articles can take very different forms, even when the number of times they are tweeted is similar. Our small case study suggests that most articles are shared within single-connected communities with limited diffusion to the public. The proposed approach and indicators can serve those interested in the public understanding of science, science communication, or research evaluation to identify when research diffuses beyond insular communities.
社交媒体上分享的研究越来越多,再加上免费研究的增加,这让我们不禁要问,像 Twitter 这样的平台上分享的科学文章是否会在学术界之外传播。我们通过从两个开放获取生物学期刊中确定至少被分享 50 次的 11 篇文章,并分析每条推文的用户的关注者网络,探索了一种新的方法来回答这个问题。我们发现,即使被分享的次数相似,科学文章的传播模式也可能采取非常不同的形式。我们的小案例研究表明,大多数文章都是在单个连通社区内共享的,向公众的传播非常有限。所提出的方法和指标可以为那些对公众理解科学、科学传播或研究评估感兴趣的人提供服务,以确定研究何时会超越孤立的社区传播。