• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“它让我大开眼界”——运用规范化过程理论审视多方面衣原体检测干预措施对全科医生的影响。

'It Opened My Eyes'-examining the impact of a multifaceted chlamydia testing intervention on general practitioners using Normalization Process Theory.

作者信息

Yeung Anna, Hocking Jane, Guy Rebecca, Fairley Christopher K, Smith Kirsty, Vaisey Alaina, Donovan Basil, Imrie John, Gunn Jane, Temple-Smith Meredith

机构信息

Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Sexual Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):626-632. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy011.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmy011
PMID:29608672
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia is the most common notifiable sexually transmissible infection in Australia. Left untreated, it can develop into pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. The majority of notifications come from general practice and it is ideally situated to test young Australians.

OBJECTIVES

The Australian Chlamydia Control Effectiveness Pilot (ACCEPt) was a multifaceted intervention that aimed to reduce chlamydia prevalence by increasing testing in 16- to 29-year-olds attending general practice. GPs were interviewed to describe the effectiveness of the ACCEPt intervention in integrating chlamydia testing into routine practice using Normalization Process Theory (NPT).

METHODS

GPs were purposively selected based on age, gender, geographic location and size of practice at baseline and midpoint. Interview data were analysed regarding the intervention components and results were interpreted using NPT.

RESULTS

A total of 44 GPs at baseline and 24 at midpoint were interviewed. Most GPs reported offering a test based on age at midpoint versus offering a test based on symptoms or patient request at baseline. Quarterly feedback was the most significant ACCEPt component for facilitating a chlamydia test.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACCEPt intervention has been able to moderately normalize chlamydia testing among GPs, although the components had varying levels of effectiveness. NPT can demonstrate the effective implementation of an intervention in general practice and has been valuable in understanding which components are essential and which components can be improved upon.

摘要

背景

衣原体感染是澳大利亚最常见的需通报的性传播感染疾病。若不加以治疗,可能会发展为盆腔炎和不孕症。大多数通报病例来自全科医疗,全科医疗非常适合对澳大利亚年轻人进行检测。

目的

澳大利亚衣原体控制有效性试点项目(ACCEPt)是一项多方面的干预措施,旨在通过增加对16至29岁到全科医疗就诊者的检测来降低衣原体感染率。通过采访全科医生,运用规范化过程理论(NPT)来描述ACCEPt干预措施在将衣原体检测纳入常规医疗中的有效性。

方法

根据年龄、性别、地理位置和基线及中期时诊所规模,有目的地选择全科医生。对采访数据进行分析,了解干预措施的各个组成部分,并运用NPT对结果进行解读。

结果

共采访了44名基线时的全科医生和24名中期时的全科医生。大多数全科医生报告称,在中期时根据年龄进行检测,而在基线时根据症状或患者要求进行检测。季度反馈是促进衣原体检测的ACCEPt项目中最重要的组成部分。

结论

ACCEPt干预措施已能够在一定程度上使全科医生对衣原体检测常态化,尽管各组成部分的有效性程度不同。规范化过程理论(NPT)能够证明一项干预措施在全科医疗中的有效实施,并且对于理解哪些组成部分至关重要以及哪些组成部分可以改进具有重要价值。

相似文献

1
'It Opened My Eyes'-examining the impact of a multifaceted chlamydia testing intervention on general practitioners using Normalization Process Theory.“它让我大开眼界”——运用规范化过程理论审视多方面衣原体检测干预措施对全科医生的影响。
Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):626-632. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy011.
2
The chlamydia knowledge, awareness and testing practices of Australian general practitioners and practice nurses: survey findings from the Australian chlamydia control effectiveness pilot (ACCEPt).澳大利亚全科医生和执业护士的衣原体知识、意识和检测实践:来自澳大利亚衣原体控制效果试点(ACCEPT)的调查结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Nov 13;14:169. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-169.
3
Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.激励全科医生对年轻女性进行衣原体机会性检测的激励支付:一项试点整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 17;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-70.
4
Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.当经济激励措施以及外部审计与反馈被取消后,全科医疗中的预防保健活动能否持续开展?可接受性:一项整群随机对照试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 13;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0.
5
Improving chlamydia knowledge should lead to increased chlamydia testing among Australian general practitioners: a cross-sectional study of chlamydia testing uptake in general practice.提高衣原体知识水平应能促使澳大利亚全科医生增加衣原体检测:一项关于全科医疗中衣原体检测接受情况的横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 7;14:584. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0584-2.
6
Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention.全科医疗中克服衣原体筛查潜在障碍的工具:一项复杂干预措施实施情况的定性评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0430-2.
7
What needs to change to increase chlamydia screening in general practice in Australia? The views of general practitioners.为了增加澳大利亚全科医疗中衣原体筛查,需要做出哪些改变?全科医生的观点。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 30;8:425. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-425.
8
Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.提高全科医学中的衣原体筛查测试:一项基于计划行为理论的复杂干预措施的改良 Zelen 前瞻性群组随机对照试验。
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 May;90(3):188-94. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051029. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
9
The experience of providing young people attending general practice with an online risk assessment tool to assess their own sexual health risk.为在全科医疗就诊的年轻人提供在线风险评估工具以评估其自身性健康风险的经验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 12;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-29.
10
Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions.澳大利亚全科医生是否认为执业护士可以在衣原体检测中发挥作用?一项关于态度和观点的定性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 31;15:31. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0757-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Study of Whole blood in Frontline Trauma (SWiFT): implementation study protocol.前线创伤全血研究(SWiFT):实施研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 5;14(2):e078953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078953.
2
Exploring Whether the Electronic Optimization of Routine Health Assessments Can Increase Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections and Provider Acceptability at an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service: Mixed Methods Evaluation.探索常规健康评估的电子化优化是否能增加原住民社区控制卫生服务机构对性传播感染的检测及医护人员的接受度:混合方法评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Nov 30;11:e51387. doi: 10.2196/51387.
3
Supporting translation of research evidence into practice-the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.
支持研究证据转化为实践——使用规范进程理论评估和为随机对照试验中的实施提供信息:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 27;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01311-1.
4
The impact of removing financial incentives and/or audit and feedback on chlamydia testing in general practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial (ACCEPt-able).取消经济激励和/或审计与反馈对一般实践中衣原体检测的影响:一项整群随机对照试验(ACCEPt-able)。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):e1003858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003858. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Ready for Prime Time? Using Normalization Process Theory to Evaluate Implementation Success of Personal Health Records Designed for Decision Making.准备好进入黄金阶段了吗?运用规范化过程理论评估为决策设计的个人健康记录的实施成效。
Front Digit Health. 2020 Nov 20;2:575951. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.575951. eCollection 2020.
6
Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: systematic reviews on effectiveness and patient preferences.基层医疗保健中的衣原体和/或淋病筛查:有效性和患者偏好的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01658-w.