Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deparment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;16(9):1503-1510.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.027. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment options for recurrent ascites resulting from decompensated cirrhosis include serial large-volume paracentesis and albumin infusion (LVP+A) or insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Insertion of TIPSs with covered stents during early stages of ascites (early TIPS, defined as 2 LVPs within the past 3 weeks and <6 LVPs in the prior 3 months) significantly improves chances of survival and reduces complications of cirrhosis compared with LVP+A. However, it is not clear if TIPS insertion is cost effective in these patients.
We developed a Markov model using the payer perspective for a hypothetical cohort of patients with cirrhosis with recurrent ascites receiving early TIPSs or LVP+A using data from publications and national databases collected from 2012 to 2018. Projected outcomes included quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), costs (2017 US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs; $/QALY). Sensitivity analyses (1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic) were conducted. ICERs less than $100,000 per QALY were considered cost effective.
In base-case analysis, early insertion of TIPS had a higher cost ($22,770) than LVP+A ($19,180), but also increased QALY (0.73 for early TIPSs and 0.65 for LVP+A), resulting in an ICER of $46,310/QALY. Results were sensitive to cost of uncomplicated TIPS insertion and transplant, need for LVP+A, probability of transplant, and decompensated QALY. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, TIPS insertion was the optimal strategy in 59.1% of simulations.
Based on Markov model analysis, early placement of TIPSs appears to be a cost-effective strategy for management of specific patients with cirrhosis and recurrent ascites. TIPS placement should be considered early and as a first-line treatment option for select patients.
失代偿性肝硬化引起的复发性腹水的治疗选择包括多次大量腹腔穿刺抽液和白蛋白输注(LVP+A)或经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)植入。在腹水早期(早期 TIPS,定义为过去 3 周内进行 2 次 LVP 和过去 3 个月内进行 <6 次 LVP)期间植入带覆盖支架的 TIPSs 可显著提高生存率并降低肝硬化并发症的发生,与 LVP+A 相比。然而,目前尚不清楚在这些患者中 TIPS 植入是否具有成本效益。
我们使用从 2012 年至 2018 年期间从出版物和国家数据库中收集的数据,为接受早期 TIPS 或 LVP+A 的复发性腹水肝硬化假设队列患者,使用支付者的角度,开发了一个 Markov 模型。预计的结果包括质量调整生命年(QALY)、成本(2017 年美元)和增量成本效益比(ICER;每 QALY 的美元数)。进行了敏感性分析(单向、双向和概率性)。ICER 低于每 QALY 100,000 美元被认为具有成本效益。
在基本案例分析中,早期 TIPS 植入的成本(22770 美元)高于 LVP+A(19180 美元),但也增加了 QALY(早期 TIPS 为 0.73,LVP+A 为 0.65),导致 ICER 为 46310 美元/QALY。结果对 TIPS 简单植入和移植的成本、LVP+A 的需求、移植的概率和失代偿 QALY 敏感。在概率敏感性分析中,TIPS 植入在 59.1%的模拟中是最佳策略。
基于 Markov 模型分析,早期 TIPS 植入似乎是管理特定肝硬化和复发性腹水患者的一种具有成本效益的策略。对于选择的患者,应尽早考虑并将 TIPS 放置作为一线治疗选择。