Cirelli Jessica Fernandes, Surita Fernanda Garanhani, Costa Maria Laura, Parpinelli Mary Angela, Haddad Samira Maerrawi, Cecatti José Guilherme
Department of Obsterics and Gynecology, School of Medical Science, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;40(3):106-114. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1623511. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the burden of indirect causes of maternal morbidity/mortality in Brazil.
Secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in 27 referral obstetric units within the Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity.
A total of 82,388 women were surveilled: 9,555 women with severe maternal morbidity were included, and 942 (9.9%) of them had indirect causes of morbidity/mortality. There was an increased risk of higher severity among the indirect causes group, which presented 7.56 times increased risk of maternal death (prevalence ratio [PR]: 7.56; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 4.99-11.45). The main indirect causes of maternal death were H1N1 influenza, sepsis, cancer and cardiovascular disease. Non-public antenatal care (PR: 2.52; 95%CI: 1.70-3.74), diabetes (PR: 1.90; 95%CI: 1.24-2.90), neoplasia (PR: 1.98; 95%CI: 1.25-3.14), kidney diseases (PR: 1.99; 95%CI: 1.14-3.49), sickle cell anemia (PR: 2.50; 95%CI: 1.16-5.41) and drug addiction (PR: 1.98; 95%CI: 1.03-3.80) were independently associated with worse results in the indirect causes group. Some procedures for the management of severity were more common for the indirect causes group.
Indirect causes were present in less than 10% of the overall cases, but they represented over 40% of maternal deaths in the current study. Indirect causes of maternal morbidity/mortality were also responsible for an increased risk of higher severity, and they were associated with worse maternal and perinatal outcomes. In middle-income countries there is a mix of indirect causes of maternal morbidity/mortality that points to some advances in the scale of obstetric transition, but also reveals the fragility of health systems.
本研究旨在评估巴西孕产妇发病/死亡间接原因的负担。
对巴西严重孕产妇发病监测网络内27个转诊产科单位进行的多中心横断面研究进行二次分析。
共监测了82388名妇女:纳入了9555名患有严重孕产妇疾病的妇女,其中942名(9.9%)有发病/死亡的间接原因。间接原因组中病情严重程度较高的风险增加,孕产妇死亡风险增加了7.56倍(患病率比[PR]:7.56;95%置信区间[95%CI]:4.99 - 11.45)。孕产妇死亡的主要间接原因是甲型H1N1流感、败血症、癌症和心血管疾病。非公共产前护理(PR:2.52;95%CI:1.70 - 3.74)、糖尿病(PR:1.90;95%CI:1.24 - 2.90)、肿瘤形成(PR:1.98;95%CI:1.25 - 3.14)、肾脏疾病(PR:1.99;95%CI:1.14 - 3.49)、镰状细胞贫血(PR:2.50;95%CI:1.16 - 5.41)和药物成瘾(PR:1.98;95%CI:1.03 - 3.80)与间接原因组的较差结果独立相关。一些严重程度管理程序在间接原因组中更为常见。
间接原因在总体病例中占比不到10%,但在本研究中占孕产妇死亡的40%以上。孕产妇发病/死亡的间接原因也导致病情严重程度较高的风险增加,并与孕产妇和围产期结局较差相关。在中等收入国家,孕产妇发病/死亡的间接原因多种多样,这表明在产科转型规模方面取得了一些进展,但也揭示了卫生系统的脆弱性。