• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的在线决策辅助工具和骨关节炎管理资源的定性评估:了解患者视角。

Qualitative Evaluation of Evidence-Based Online Decision Aid and Resources for Osteoarthritis Management: Understanding Patient Perspectives.

机构信息

University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, and University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):46-55. doi: 10.1002/acr.23572.

DOI:10.1002/acr.23572
PMID:29609208
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively examine the experiences with, and impact of, evidence-based online resources in self-management among Australians with osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Telephone interviews were conducted with 36 users of a novel osteoarthritis resource, the Osteoarthritis Awareness Hub. Rogers' 5 attributes of innovation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability) and outcomes guided the semistructured interview and analysis. Maximum variation sampling was used, and data saturation occurred after 33 interviews. A coding scheme was agreed upon and all interview data were entered into NVivo for qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Study participants had high levels of literacy and health literacy. For adoption and implementation of an innovation, the participants' narratives confirmed and underscored the fact that it was important that it come from an authoritative and trusting voice and that its perceived benefits align with participants' values and existing practices (relative advantage and compatibility). The participants also valued seeing the practical benefits of the innovation, such as its capacity to impart quality and balanced new insights and information, and to maintain and monitor their personal progress. Notably, many participants spoke about the mental and physical health benefits that they derived from engagement with the online resources.

CONCLUSION

Our study findings confirm that web-based tools can be a useful adjunct to patients adopting self-management strategies. Rogers' theory provides a framework for a deeper appreciation of the how, why, and what questions concerning the adoption and implementation processes, especially among people with good technology and health literacy.

摘要

目的

定性研究澳大利亚骨关节炎患者在自我管理中使用基于证据的在线资源的体验及其影响。

方法

对一种新型骨关节炎资源(骨关节炎意识中心)的 36 名使用者进行了电话访谈。罗杰斯的创新的 5 个属性(相对优势、兼容性、复杂性、试验性和可观察性)和结果指导了半结构化访谈和分析。采用最大变异抽样,在进行了 33 次访谈后达到数据饱和。达成了一个编码方案,并将所有访谈数据输入 NVivo 进行定性内容分析。

结果

研究参与者具有较高的文化程度和健康素养。对于创新的采用和实施,参与者的叙述证实并强调了一个事实,即它来自一个权威和值得信赖的声音,并且其被认为的好处与参与者的价值观和现有实践相一致(相对优势和兼容性)非常重要。参与者还重视看到创新的实际好处,例如它能够传授优质且平衡的新见解和信息,并保持和监测他们的个人进展。值得注意的是,许多参与者谈到了他们从在线资源的参与中获得的身心健康益处。

结论

我们的研究结果证实,基于网络的工具可以作为患者采用自我管理策略的有用辅助手段。罗杰斯的理论为更深入地了解采用和实施过程中的“如何”、“为什么”和“什么”问题提供了一个框架,尤其是在具有良好技术和健康素养的人群中。

相似文献

1
Qualitative Evaluation of Evidence-Based Online Decision Aid and Resources for Osteoarthritis Management: Understanding Patient Perspectives.基于证据的在线决策辅助工具和骨关节炎管理资源的定性评估:了解患者视角。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):46-55. doi: 10.1002/acr.23572.
2
Qualitative insights into the experience of teaching shared decision making within adult education health literacy programmes for lower-literacy learners.成人教育健康扫盲计划中为低识字学习者教授共同决策的经验的定性分析。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1393-1400. doi: 10.1111/hex.12580. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Can adults with low literacy understand shared decision making questions? A qualitative investigation.识字能力低的成年人能理解共同决策问题吗?一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1796-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 9.
4
Investigation of open educational resources adoption in higher education using Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory.运用罗杰斯创新扩散理论对高等教育中开放教育资源的采用情况进行调查。
Heliyon. 2022 Jul 11;8(7):e09885. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09885. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study.安全网医疗系统中患者及照护者使用在线门户的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 3;17(12):e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4847.
6
Understanding the Relationships between mHealth Apps' Characteristics, Trialability, and mHealth Literacy.理解移动健康应用程序的特征、试用性与移动健康素养之间的关系。
J Health Commun. 2017 Apr;22(4):346-354. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1296508. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Uptake of a self-guided digital treatment for depression and anxiety: A qualitative study exploring patient perspectives and decision-making.自我引导的数字治疗抑郁和焦虑症的应用:一项探索患者观点和决策的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13976. doi: 10.1111/hex.13976.
8
Nurses' adoption of technology: application of Rogers' innovation-diffusion model.护士对技术的采用:罗杰斯创新扩散模型的应用
Appl Nurs Res. 2004 Nov;17(4):231-8.
9
Listening to Communities: Mixed-Method Study of the Engagement of Disadvantaged Mothers and Pregnant Women With Digital Health Technologies.倾听社区声音:对弱势母亲和孕妇参与数字健康技术情况的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 5;19(7):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7736.
10
Development and field testing of a consumer shared decision-making training program for adults with low literacy.针对低识字水平成年人的消费者共同决策培训项目的开发与现场测试。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Experiences of Digital Health Interventions for the Self-Management of Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.慢性疼痛自我管理数字健康干预措施的患者体验:系统评价与主题综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e69100. doi: 10.2196/69100.
2
Stakeholder views about a novel consumer health resource for knee osteoarthritis.利益相关者对一种新型膝关节骨关节炎消费者健康资源的看法。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2020 Mar 10;2(2):100058. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100058. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
The development and utility of a multicriteria patient decision aid for people contemplating treatment for osteoarthritis.
制定并应用多准则患者决策辅助工具,以帮助考虑骨关节炎治疗方案的人群。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2775-2785. doi: 10.1111/hex.13505. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
Osteoarthritis management: Does the pharmacist play a role in bridging the gap between what patients actually know and what they ought to know? Insights from a national online survey.骨关节炎管理:药剂师在缩小患者实际了解和应了解之间的差距方面是否发挥作用?来自全国在线调查的见解。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):936-946. doi: 10.1111/hex.13429. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
5
Novel Stepped Care Approach to Provide Education and Exercise Therapy for Patellofemoral Pain: Feasibility Study.新型阶梯式护理方法为髌股疼痛提供教育和运动治疗:可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 22;22(7):e18584. doi: 10.2196/18584.
6
MyBackPain-evaluation of an innovative consumer-focused website for low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.我的背痛——一个创新的以消费者为中心的腰痛网站评估:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 14;9(5):e027516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027516.