John H. Stroger Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Dec;70(12):1771-1777. doi: 10.1002/acr.23569. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
To compare the quality of care received by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2 settings within the academic institution (a dedicated lupus clinic and a general rheumatology clinic) using validated SLE quality measures.
One hundred fifty consenting, consecutive SLE patients receiving longitudinal care at the Rush University general rheumatology clinic (n = 73) or the subspecialty lupus clinic (n = 77) were recruited. An updated quality measure survey and retrospective medical chart review were used to evaluate each quality measure (n = 20). The overall and individual quality measure performance was calculated and compared between the 2 groups. Data on the number of SLE patients seen by each rheumatologist were collected to assess the relationship between SLE patient volume and quality measures.
Overall quality measure performance was significantly better in SLE patients receiving care at the lupus clinic (85.8% versus 70.2% of patients receiving care at the general rheumatology clinic; P = 0.001). Differences between the 2 groups were observed for sunscreen counseling (98.7% and 83.6%, respectively; P = 0.001), antiphospholipid antibody testing (71.4% and 37%, respectively; P < 0.001), pneumococcal vaccination (84.8% and 48.8%, respectively; P < 0.001), bone mineral density testing (94.2% and 54.5%, respectively; P < 0.001), drug counseling (92.2% and 80.8%, respectively; P = 0.04), use of a steroid-sparing agent (100% and 82%, respectively; P < 0.007), use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (94.4% and 58.3%, respectively; P = 0.03), and cardiovascular disease risk assessment (40.3% and 15.1%, respectively; P = 0.01). There was a moderate correlation between physician volume and quality measure performance (ρ = 0.48, P < 0.001).
Compared with the general rheumatology clinic, the dedicated lupus clinic had better quality measure performance in this cross-sectional single-center study. In our health care system, we also observed indicators suggesting that rheumatologists with a higher volume of SLE patients provide higher quality of care.
使用经过验证的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)质量评估方法,比较学术机构内两个环境(专门的狼疮诊所和一般风湿病诊所)中接受治疗的 SLE 患者的护理质量。
本研究共纳入了 150 名连续就诊于拉什大学综合风湿病诊所(n=73)或亚专科狼疮诊所(n=77)、同意参与研究的 SLE 患者。采用更新后的质量评估方法调查和回顾性病历审查,对每位患者进行了 20 项质量评估(n=20)。计算并比较了两组患者的总体和单项质量评估表现。收集每位风湿病医生诊治的 SLE 患者数量的数据,以评估 SLE 患者数量与质量评估之间的关系。
在狼疮诊所接受治疗的 SLE 患者的整体质量评估表现明显优于在综合风湿病诊所接受治疗的患者(分别为 85.8%和 70.2%;P=0.001)。两组患者在防晒霜咨询(分别为 98.7%和 83.6%;P=0.001)、抗磷脂抗体检测(分别为 71.4%和 37%;P<0.001)、肺炎球菌疫苗接种(分别为 84.8%和 48.8%;P<0.001)、骨密度检测(分别为 94.2%和 54.5%;P<0.001)、药物咨询(分别为 92.2%和 80.8%;P=0.04)、使用类固醇保存剂(分别为 100%和 82%;P<0.007)、使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(分别为 94.4%和 58.3%;P=0.03)和心血管疾病风险评估(分别为 40.3%和 15.1%;P=0.01)方面的表现存在差异。医生诊治患者数量与质量评估表现之间存在中度相关性(ρ=0.48,P<0.001)。
与综合风湿病诊所相比,在这项横断面单中心研究中,专门的狼疮诊所的质量评估表现更好。在我们的医疗体系中,我们还观察到指标表明,诊治 SLE 患者较多的风湿病医生提供的护理质量更高。