Suppr超能文献

黄荆(Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less.)用于戒烟的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less. for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Sirindhorn College of Public Health, Trang, Thailand.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2018 Apr;37:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Several randomized controlled trials have investigated Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less. for smoking cessation but there remains no critical summary of overall findings. This study uses systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the efficacy and safety of V. cinerea.

METHODS

Nine databases were searched through November 2017. Randomized controlled trials that reported the smoking cessation effect of V. cinerea were included. Data were extracted by two independent researchers. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and JADAD score. The estimates of pooled effects were calculated as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five trials with 347 smokers were included. V. cinerea treatment group was significantly associated with cessation rate higher than that in the control group with no evidence of heterogeneity for both continuous abstinence rate (CAR) at week 8 with risk ratio (RR): 1.69, 95% CI [1.00, 2.86]; week 12 RR: 2.18, 95% CI [1.17, 4.04]) and 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate (PAR) (week 8 RR: 1.51, 95% CI [1.01, 2.27]; week 12 RR: 1.93, 95% CI [1.24, 2.99]) at week 8 and 12, respectively. There was no significant difference of all adverse events between the treatment and the control groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that V. cinerea has potential efficacy for smoking cessation. Further well-design RCTs of standardized V. cinerea compared with standard treatment should be conducted to strengthen this evidence.

摘要

背景与目的

多项随机对照试验已经研究了苦艾(L.)Less. 戒烟,但仍没有对总体结果进行关键总结。本研究使用系统评价和荟萃分析来总结苦艾的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过 2017 年 11 月搜索了 9 个数据库。纳入报告苦艾戒烟效果的随机对照试验。由两名独立研究人员提取数据。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险和 Jadad 评分评估研究质量。使用随机效应模型计算汇总效应的估计值为相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间。

结果

纳入了 5 项涉及 347 名吸烟者的试验。苦艾治疗组与对照组的戒烟率显著相关,8 周时连续禁欲率(CAR)和 12 周时的 7 天点患病率禁欲率(PAR)均无异质性,风险比(RR)分别为 1.69(95% CI [1.00, 2.86])和 2.18(95% CI [1.17, 4.04])。(RR:1.51,95% CI [1.01, 2.27])和 12 周(RR:1.93,95% CI [1.24, 2.99])。治疗组和对照组之间所有不良事件的发生率没有显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,苦艾具有潜在的戒烟功效。应该进行进一步的、设计良好的、标准化苦艾与标准治疗相比的 RCT,以加强这一证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验