• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目中,使用免疫化学粪便潜血试验对标本流程实施失效模式与效应分析:米兰结直肠癌筛查项目中的一项质量改进项目。

Implementation of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to the specimens flow in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests: a quality improvement project in the Milan colorectal cancer screening programme.

作者信息

Deandrea Silvia, Tidone Enrica, Bellini Aldo, Bisanti Luigi, Leonardo Nico Gerardo, Silvestri Anna Rita, Consonni Dario

机构信息

European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra VA, Italy.

Agenzia di Tutela della Salute della Citta Metropolitana di Milano, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Mar 22;7(1):e000299. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000299. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000299
PMID:29610774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5878255/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A multidisciplinary working group applied the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) approach to the flow of kits and specimens for the first-level test of a colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests.

METHODS

HFMEA comprised four steps: (1) identification and mapping of the process steps (subprocesses); (2) analysis of failure modes and calculation of the risk priority numbers (RPNs); (3) identification of corrective actions; and (4) follow-up and evaluation of corrective actions.

RESULTS

The team identified 9 main failure modes, 12 effects and 34 associated causes. RPN scores ranged from 2 to 96. Failure modes within the first five positions in the ranking list ordered by RPN concerned: 'degraded haemoglobin in the specimen', 'mixed-up kits' and 'anonymous specimen'. All of these could lead to false-negative results and/or subjects with positive tests not being recalled for assessment. The team planned corrective actions for those failure modes. As a result, the follow-up of corrective actions showed a significant decrease in the proportion of anonymous kits from 11.6 to 4.8 per 1000 (relative reduction of 59%). The HFMEA exercise led to a reduction in: missed positive tests; missed cancer and high-risk adenomas; complaints about the communication of test results to a person who never did the test; and false-negative results due either to haemoglobin degradation or an expired sampling tube.

CONCLUSIONS

HFMEA is a useful tool for reducing errors in colorectal cancer screening programmes using faecal occult blood tests and is characterised by a straightforward interpretation of results and ease of communication to healthcare managers and decision makers.

摘要

背景

一个多学科工作小组将医疗失效模式与效应分析(HFMEA)方法应用于一项使用免疫化学粪便潜血试验的结直肠癌筛查项目一级检测的试剂盒和样本流程。

方法

HFMEA包括四个步骤:(1)识别并绘制流程步骤(子流程);(2)分析失效模式并计算风险优先数(RPN);(3)识别纠正措施;(4)对纠正措施进行跟进和评估。

结果

该团队识别出9种主要失效模式、12种影响及34个相关原因。RPN得分范围为2至96。按RPN排序的排名列表中前五位的失效模式涉及:“样本中血红蛋白降解”“试剂盒混淆”和“样本匿名”。所有这些都可能导致假阴性结果和/或检测呈阳性的受试者未被召回进行评估。该团队针对这些失效模式制定了纠正措施。结果,对纠正措施的跟进显示,匿名试剂盒的比例从每1000个中的11.6个显著降至4.8个(相对降低59%)。HFMEA活动使以下情况减少:漏检阳性检测;漏检癌症和高危腺瘤;对将检测结果告知从未进行检测的人的投诉;以及因血红蛋白降解或采样管过期导致的假阴性结果。

结论

HFMEA是一种用于减少使用粪便潜血试验的结直肠癌筛查项目中错误的有用工具,其特点是结果解释直接,便于与医疗管理人员和决策者沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f665/5878255/4fe89e92a600/bmjoq-2017-000299f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f665/5878255/a24c6860f041/bmjoq-2017-000299f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f665/5878255/4619f7bf4c41/bmjoq-2017-000299f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f665/5878255/4fe89e92a600/bmjoq-2017-000299f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f665/5878255/a24c6860f041/bmjoq-2017-000299f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f665/5878255/4619f7bf4c41/bmjoq-2017-000299f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f665/5878255/4fe89e92a600/bmjoq-2017-000299f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to the specimens flow in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme using immunochemical faecal occult blood tests: a quality improvement project in the Milan colorectal cancer screening programme.在基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目中,使用免疫化学粪便潜血试验对标本流程实施失效模式与效应分析:米兰结直肠癌筛查项目中的一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Mar 22;7(1):e000299. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000299. eCollection 2018.
2
Applying the healthcare failure mode and effects analysis approach to improve the quality of an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.运用医疗失效模式与效应分析方法提升规范化结直肠癌筛查项目的质量。
J Med Screen. 2024 Jun;31(2):70-77. doi: 10.1177/09691413231197300. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Comprehensive protocol of traceability during IVF: the result of a multicentre failure mode and effect analysis.IVF 过程中可追溯性的综合方案:多中心失效模式和影响分析的结果。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1612-1620. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex144.
4
Failure mode and effects analysis and fault tree analysis of surface image guided cranial radiosurgery.表面图像引导的颅脑放射外科手术的失效模式与效应分析及故障树分析
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2449-61. doi: 10.1118/1.4918319.
5
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
6
Use of failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) to improve medication management process.运用失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)改善药物管理流程。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Mar 13;30(2):175-186. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2015-0113.
7
A comparison of two prospective risk analysis methods: Traditional FMEA and a modified healthcare FMEA.两种前瞻性风险分析方法的比较:传统失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)和改良的医疗保健FMEA
Med Phys. 2016 Dec;43(12):6347. doi: 10.1118/1.4966129.
8
Application of failure mode and effects analysis in a clinical chemistry laboratory.失效模式与效应分析在临床化学实验室中的应用。
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Aug 25;448:80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
9
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.使用便潜血试验(Hemoccult)筛查结直肠癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2.
10
Preventing blood transfusion failures: FMEA, an effective assessment method.预防输血失败:失效模式与效应分析,一种有效的评估方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 30;17(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2380-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving patient safety during intrahospital transportation of mechanically ventilated patients with critical illness.提高危重病机械通气患者院内转运期间的患者安全性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Apr;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000698.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of two prospective risk analysis methods: Traditional FMEA and a modified healthcare FMEA.两种前瞻性风险分析方法的比较:传统失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)和改良的医疗保健FMEA
Med Phys. 2016 Dec;43(12):6347. doi: 10.1118/1.4966129.
2
Risk analysis of the preanalytical process based on quality indicators data.基于质量指标数据的分析前过程风险分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):368-377. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0235.
3
A Review of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) in Radiotherapy.放射治疗中的医疗失效模式与效应分析(HFMEA)综述
Health Phys. 2016 Oct;111(4):317-26. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000536.
4
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
5
Ambient temperature and FIT performance in the Emilia-Romagna colorectal cancer screening programme.艾米利亚-罗马涅地区结直肠癌筛查项目中的环境温度与粪便免疫化学检测性能
J Med Screen. 2016 Dec;23(4):186-191. doi: 10.1177/0969141316639618. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
6
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
7
Failure mode and effects analysis: a comparison of two common risk prioritisation methods.失效模式与效应分析:两种常见风险优先级排序方法的比较
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May;25(5):329-36. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004130. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
8
Failure mode and effects analysis and fault tree analysis of surface image guided cranial radiosurgery.表面图像引导的颅脑放射外科手术的失效模式与效应分析及故障树分析
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2449-61. doi: 10.1118/1.4918319.
9
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Executive summary.欧洲结直肠癌筛查和诊断质量保证指南。第一版——执行摘要。
Endoscopy. 2012 Sep;44 Suppl 3:SE1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309822. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
10
Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests.英国开展第一百万次肠癌筛查测试后,该筛查项目的结果。
Gut. 2012 Oct;61(10):1439-46. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843. Epub 2011 Dec 7.