• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于下背痛的躯体放大评定量表的开发。

The development of a Somatic Amplification Rating Scale for low-back pain.

作者信息

Korbon G A, DeGood D E, Schroeder M E, Schwartz D P, Shutty M S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Oct;12(8):787-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198710000-00014.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-198710000-00014
PMID:2961092
Abstract

The development of a new scale, the Somatic Amplification Rating Scale (SARS), for the quantification of exaggerated (nonorganic) motor, sensory, and pain responses occurring during a standardized physical examination is described. This 13-item scale, partially based on a measure of nonorganic physical signs developed by Waddell et al, was administered to 127 low-back pain patients at an outpatient pain center. It was determined that the 13-item scale could be shortened to seven items with improved ease of administration and little loss of reliability and validity. Interrater reliability of the finalized seven-item scale was excellent (R = 0.93). Finally, it was determined that patients with high SARS scores were significantly more likely to be receiving workers' compensation benefits and to endorse physical symptoms with greater intensity on psychologic testing (Symptom Checklist 90).

摘要

本文描述了一种新的量表——躯体放大评定量表(SARS)的开发,该量表用于量化在标准化体格检查中出现的夸张(非器质性)运动、感觉和疼痛反应。这个包含13个条目的量表部分基于Waddell等人开发的非器质性体征测量方法,在一家门诊疼痛中心对127名腰痛患者进行了施测。结果发现,13个条目的量表可以缩短为7个条目,施测更加简便,且可靠性和有效性几乎没有损失。最终确定的7个条目量表的评分者间信度极佳(R = 0.93)。最后,研究发现SARS评分高的患者更有可能获得工伤赔偿福利,并且在心理测试(症状自评量表90)中更强烈地认可身体症状。

相似文献

1
The development of a Somatic Amplification Rating Scale for low-back pain.一种用于下背痛的躯体放大评定量表的开发。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Oct;12(8):787-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198710000-00014.
2
Nonorganic signs of significance in low back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 May 1;21(9):1077-81. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00017.
3
A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs.关于非器质性体征含义的结构化循证综述:瓦德尔征
Pain Med. 2003 Jun;4(2):141-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03015.x.
4
The pain drawing and Waddell's nonorganic physical signs in chronic low-back pain.慢性下腰痛中的疼痛图示与瓦德尔非器质性体征
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Oct 1;18(13):1717-22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199310000-00001.
5
Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain.下背痛评定量表:一种下背痛评估工具的验证
Pain. 1994 Jun;57(3):317-326. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90007-8.
6
Waddell non-organic signs: new evidence suggests somatic amplification among outpatient chronic pain patients.瓦德尔非器质性体征:新证据表明门诊慢性疼痛患者存在躯体放大现象。
Spine J. 2017 Apr;17(4):505-510. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
7
Performance of the Angle Labor Pain Questionnaire During Initiation of Epidural Analgesia in Early Active Labor.活跃期早期硬膜外镇痛开始时角度分娩疼痛问卷的性能
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1546-1553. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001679.
8
The use of nonorganic signs and symptoms as a screening tool for return-to-work in patients with acute low back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 1;25(15):1925-31. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00010.
9
Cervical nonorganic signs: a new clinical tool to assess abnormal illness behavior in neck pain patients: a pilot study.颈椎非器质性体征:评估颈部疼痛患者异常疾病行为的一种新临床工具:一项初步研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Feb;81(2):170-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90136-9.
10
What is the role of "nonorganic somatic components" in functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain undergoing fitness for work evaluation?在进行工作适应性评估时,慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的功能能力评估中,“非器质性躯体成分”的作用是什么?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 15;37(4):E243-50. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822e6088.