• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(BR)对比地塞米松、利妥昔单抗和环磷酰胺(DRC)在华氏巨球蛋白血症患者中的疗效。

Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) versus dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2018 Aug;97(8):1417-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3311-z. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00277-018-3311-z
PMID:29610969
Abstract

The treatment approaches for Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) are largely based upon information from single-arm phase II trials, without comparative data. We compared the efficacy of two commonly used regimens in routine practice (bendamustine-rituximab (BR) and dexamethasone, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide (DRC)) and evaluated their activity with respect to the patients' MYD88 mutation status. Of 160 consecutive patients, 60 received BR (43 with relapsed/refractory WM) and 100 received DRC (50 had relapsed/refractory WM). In the treatment-naïve setting, overall response rate (ORR) was 93% with BR versus 96% with DRC (p = 0.55). Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) with BR and DRC was 88 and 61%, respectively (p = 0.07). In salvage setting, ORR was 95% with BR versus 87% with DRC, p = 0.45; median PFS with BR was 58 versus 32 months with DRC (2-year PFS was 66 versus 53%; p = 0.08). Median disease-specific survival was not reached with BR versus 166 months with DRC (p = 0.51). The time-to-event endpoints and depth of response were independent of the MYD88 mutation status. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events of both regimens were comparable. A trend for longer PFS was observed with BR although the regimens have comparable toxicities. The activity of BR and DRC appears to be unaffected by patients' MYD88 mutation status.

摘要

华氏巨球蛋白血症(WM)的治疗方法主要基于单臂 II 期临床试验的信息,没有对照数据。我们比较了两种在常规实践中常用的方案(苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗(BR)和地塞米松、利妥昔单抗加环磷酰胺(DRC))的疗效,并评估了它们在患者 MYD88 突变状态方面的活性。在 160 例连续患者中,60 例接受 BR(43 例为复发/难治性 WM),100 例接受 DRC(50 例为复发/难治性 WM)。在初治患者中,BR 的总缓解率(ORR)为 93%,而 DRC 的 ORR 为 96%(p=0.55)。BR 和 DRC 的 2 年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为 88%和 61%(p=0.07)。在挽救治疗中,BR 的 ORR 为 95%,而 DRC 的 ORR 为 87%(p=0.45);BR 的中位 PFS 为 58 个月,而 DRC 的中位 PFS 为 32 个月(2 年 PFS 为 66%比 53%;p=0.08)。BR 的中位疾病特异性生存率为未达到,而 DRC 的中位疾病特异性生存率为 166 个月(p=0.51)。无事件生存时间和反应深度与 MYD88 突变状态无关。两种方案的 3 级及以上不良事件发生率相当。BR 的 PFS 有延长趋势,尽管两种方案的毒性相当。BR 和 DRC 的活性似乎不受患者 MYD88 突变状态的影响。

相似文献

1
Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) versus dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(BR)对比地塞米松、利妥昔单抗和环磷酰胺(DRC)在华氏巨球蛋白血症患者中的疗效。
Ann Hematol. 2018 Aug;97(8):1417-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3311-z. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
Dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide for relapsed and/or refractory and treatment-naïve patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia.地塞米松、利妥昔单抗和环磷酰胺治疗复发/难治性和/或初治 Waldenstrom 巨球蛋白血症患者。
Br J Haematol. 2017 Oct;179(1):98-105. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14826. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
3
Diagnosis and Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Mayo Stratification of Macroglobulinemia and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Guidelines 2016.华氏巨球蛋白血症的诊断与治疗:2016 年 Mayo 巨球蛋白血症分层与风险适应性治疗(mSMART)指南。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1257-1265. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5763.
4
Bendamustine and rituximab combination is safe and effective as salvage regimen in Waldenström macroglobulinemia.苯达莫司汀与利妥昔单抗联合作为挽救方案用于华氏巨球蛋白血症是安全有效的。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(9):2637-42. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1012714. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
5
Frontline Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia with Chemoimmunotherapy.华氏巨球蛋白血症的一线化疗免疫治疗
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2023 Aug;37(4):671-687. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 26.
6
Assessment of fixed-duration therapies for treatment-naïve Waldenström macroglobulinemia.初治华氏巨球蛋白血症的固定疗程治疗评估。
Am J Hematol. 2021 Aug 1;96(8):945-953. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26210. Epub 2021 May 22.
7
Prospective Clinical Trial of Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, and Rituximab as Primary Therapy in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.来那度胺、地塞米松和利妥昔单抗作为原发性治疗华氏巨球蛋白血症的前瞻性临床试验。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 15;24(14):3247-3252. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0152. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Frontline therapy with bendamustine rituximab (BR) and rituximab cyclophosphamide vincristine prednisone (RCVP) confers similar long-term outcomes in patients with treatment naïve Waldenström macroglobulinemia in a real-world setting: a population-based analysis.在真实世界环境中,苯达莫司汀利妥昔单抗(BR)和利妥昔单抗环磷酰胺长春新碱泼尼松(RCVP)一线治疗在初治华氏巨球蛋白血症患者中具有相似的长期结局:一项基于人群的分析。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2024 Mar;65(3):346-352. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2290466. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
9
Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Versus Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III iNNOVATE Study.依鲁替尼联合利妥昔单抗与安慰剂联合利妥昔单抗治疗华氏巨球蛋白血症的随机 III 期 iNNOVATE 研究的最终分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 1;40(1):52-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00838. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
An unusual case of cutaneous Waldenström macroglobulinemia with the MYD88 L265P mutation.一例罕见的伴有MYD88 L265P突变的皮肤性华氏巨球蛋白血症病例。
J Cutan Pathol. 2020 Sep;47(9):850-853. doi: 10.1111/cup.13722. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia - A State-of-the-Art Review: Part 2- Focus on Therapy.华氏巨球蛋白血症——最新综述:第2部分——聚焦治疗
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 1;17(1):e2025015. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2025.015. eCollection 2025.
2
Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition: an Effective Strategy to Manage Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制:治疗华氏巨球蛋白血症的有效策略。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2024 Jun;19(3):120-137. doi: 10.1007/s11899-024-00731-0. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
How I use genomics and BTK inhibitors in the treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia.
我如何在 Waldenström 巨球蛋白血症的治疗中使用基因组学和 BTK 抑制剂。
Blood. 2024 Apr 25;143(17):1702-1712. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017235.
4
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Targeted Agents Taking Center Stage.华氏巨球蛋白血症:靶向药物占据舞台中心。
Drugs. 2024 Jan;84(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01974-6. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
5
Ibrutinib and venetoclax as primary therapy in symptomatic, treatment-naïve Waldenström macroglobulinemia.伊布替尼联合维奈托克作为有症状、初治的华氏巨球蛋白血症的一线治疗。
Blood. 2024 Feb 15;143(7):582-591. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023022420.
6
Advances in Treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.华氏巨球蛋白血症的治疗进展
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1375-1386. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01459-5. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Waldenström macroglobulinemia: a review of pathogenesis, current treatment, and future prospects.华氏巨球蛋白血症:发病机制、现有治疗方法和未来前景的综述。
Ann Hematol. 2024 Jun;103(6):1859-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05345-9. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
8
Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.华氏巨球蛋白血症:2023 年诊断、风险分层和治疗更新。
Am J Hematol. 2023 Feb;98(2):348-358. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26796. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
9
A Canadian Perspective on the Treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.从加拿大视角看华氏巨球蛋白血症的治疗。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 28;29(10):7122-7139. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100560.
10
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Mechanisms of Disease Progression and Current Therapies.华氏巨球蛋白血症:疾病进展的机制和当前的治疗方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 22;23(19):11145. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911145.