• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动作情境在物体可供性中的作用。

The role of the action context in object affordance.

作者信息

Zhao Liang

机构信息

School of Education, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, No. 1 Hi-Tech Avenue, Baoji, 721000, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2019 Mar;83(2):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1002-y. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-018-1002-y
PMID:29610980
Abstract

Behavioral and neuroscience studies have shown that observation of objects automatically evokes potential actions to interact with those objects. In this study, the left and right hand key presses were facilitated when they corresponded with the task-irrelevant handle orientation of household objects, which is termed the affordance effect. The present study investigated how the affordance effect is affected by the action context when other agents are observed acting on a neutral or dangerous object. Participants were shown a series of pictures in which an actor grasped a neutral or dangerous object and moved it away from or toward the participant. The participants were required to press different keys to identify a symbol which was presented above the last picture. The results showed that affordance effect of a neutral object was modulated by the direction of object movement. When the neutral object moved away from the participant, an affordance effect was observed if the perceived action was congruent with handle orientation, whereas the affordance effect emerged if the perceived action was incongruent with handle orientation when the object was moved toward the participant. However, for the dangerous object, the affordance effect was obtained regardless of object movement direction or congruency between perceived action and handle orientation. This result suggests that the processing of objects involves a sophisticated integration of body behavior with the object.

摘要

行为学和神经科学研究表明,对物体的观察会自动引发与这些物体进行交互的潜在动作。在本研究中,当左右按键与家用物品的任务无关的把手方向相对应时,按键操作会得到促进,这被称为可供性效应。本研究调查了在观察到其他主体对中性或危险物体采取行动时,可供性效应如何受到行动背景的影响。向参与者展示了一系列图片,图片中一名演员抓住一个中性或危险物体,并将其移开或移向参与者。要求参与者按下不同的按键来识别最后一张图片上方呈现的一个符号。结果表明,中性物体的可供性效应受到物体移动方向的调节。当中性物体远离参与者移动时,如果感知到的动作与把手方向一致,则会观察到可供性效应,而当物体移向参与者时,如果感知到的动作与把手方向不一致,则会出现可供性效应。然而,对于危险物体,无论物体的移动方向或感知到的动作与把手方向之间的一致性如何,都会获得可供性效应。这一结果表明,对物体的处理涉及身体行为与物体的复杂整合。

相似文献

1
The role of the action context in object affordance.动作情境在物体可供性中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Mar;83(2):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1002-y. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).规避基于物体的对应效应中的空间混淆因素:双手可供性任务(BMAT)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Nov;72(11):2605-2613. doi: 10.1177/1747021819852216. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
Keep away from danger: dangerous objects in dynamic and static situations.远离危险:动态和静态环境中的危险物品。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 2;7:344. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00344. eCollection 2013.
4
Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?已抓住的物体是否激活运动功能?
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1363-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1004-9. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
5
Character Cues Modulate the Affordance Effects during Danger Warning.角色提示调节危险警告期间的可供性效应。
Span J Psychol. 2020 May 21;23:e2. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.2.
6
The Automaticity of Affordance of Dangerous Object.危险物体可供性的自动性
Span J Psychol. 2016 Nov 3;19:E74. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.76.
7
The Influence of Visually Dangerous Information on Imitation in Children.视觉危险信息对儿童模仿行为的影响。
J Mot Behav. 2020;52(5):578-589. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1656161. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
8
Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition.配对物体之间的隐含动作通过抑制作用导致可供性选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1021-36. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000059. Epub 2015 May 11.
9
Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?剪影和照片是否产生了根本不同的基于对象的对应效应?
Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features.语境对与动作相关的物体特征的处理的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Apr;36(2):330-40. doi: 10.1037/a0017180.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotions Modulate Affordances-Related Motor Responses: A Priming Experiment.情绪调节与可供性相关的运动反应:一项启动实验。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 8;13:701714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.701714. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Keep away from danger: dangerous objects in dynamic and static situations.远离危险:动态和静态环境中的危险物品。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 2;7:344. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00344. eCollection 2013.
2
When emulation becomes reciprocity.当模拟成为互惠。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Aug;8(6):662-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss044. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
3
Bodies and other visual objects: the dialectics of reaching toward objects.身体与其他视觉对象:伸向物体的辩证法。
Psychol Res. 2013 Jan;77(1):31-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0391-y. Epub 2011 Nov 19.
4
From simulation to reciprocity: the case of complementary actions.从模拟到互惠:互补行动的案例。
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(2):146-58. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.586579. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
5
Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions.观察到的动作的社会维度特异性地调节皮质脊髓兴奋性。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):557-68. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2650-y. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
6
The predictive mirror: interactions of mirror and affordance processes during action observation.预测之镜:动作观察过程中镜子与可供性加工的相互作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):171-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0029-x.
7
Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state.工具的类西蒙效应和功能可供性效应:物体感知辨别与物体动作状态的影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2190-201. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.486903. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
8
Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features.语境对与动作相关的物体特征的处理的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Apr;36(2):330-40. doi: 10.1037/a0017180.
9
When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions.何时模拟非人类代理?区分交际行为和非交际行为。
Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
10
On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects.关于动作规划、物体识别以及观察到的动作和物体的运动表征之间的关系。
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):444-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 May 2.