• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狼疮性肾炎患者肾脏存活的结局及预测因素:环磷酰胺与霉酚酸酯的比较

Outcome and predictors of renal survival in patients with lupus nephritis: Comparison between cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil.

作者信息

Joo Young Bin, Kang Young Mo, Kim Hyoun-Ah, Suh Chang-Hee, Kim Tae-Jong, Park Yong-Wook, Lee Jisoo, Lee Joo-Hyun, Yoo Dae Hyun, Bae Sang-Cheol, Lee Hye-Soon, Bang So-Young

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 May;21(5):1031-1039. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13274. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.13274
PMID:29611341
Abstract

AIM

To compare renal outcomes between cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and attempt to identify a predictor of renal survival.

METHODS

A total of 99 patients with class III-V lupus nephritis (LN) and treated with CYC or MMF were enrolled. The remission rate and predictors of poor renal outcomes in LN were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean age at LN diagnosis was 31.7 years. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for the chronicity index (3.1 ± 2.4 and 2.3 ± 0.8 for CYC and MMF, respectively, P = 0.007). The overall remission rate was 76.8% and 77.7% after 6 and 12 months, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups at these time points. After a median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range 12-60), eight (8.1%) patients had chronic kidney disease, four (4.1%) were dialyzed permanently, and seven (7.1%) suffered a relapse, with no significant difference in these final outcomes between the two groups. Adverse events included infection (CYC group), and rash and neutropenia (MMF group), with no significant difference in frequency between the two groups. Failure of induction therapy (hazards ratio [HR] = 10.626, P = 0.022) and the creatinine level at diagnosis of LN (HR = 8.397, P = 0.007) were significantly associated with renal survival adjusted for age at LN diagnosis, disease duration and proteinuria.

CONCLUSION

Response to current induction therapy for LN was favorable, and 6 months response following induction therapy was the most important predictor for renal survival.

摘要

目的

比较环磷酰胺(CYC)和霉酚酸酯(MMF)的肾脏预后,并试图确定肾脏生存的预测因素。

方法

共纳入99例接受CYC或MMF治疗的Ⅲ-Ⅴ型狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者。评估LN的缓解率和不良肾脏预后的预测因素。

结果

LN诊断时的平均年龄为31.7岁。除慢性指数外,两组的基线特征相似(CYC组和MMF组分别为3.1±2.4和2.3±0.8,P = 0.007)。6个月和12个月后的总体缓解率分别为76.8%和77.7%,两组在这些时间点无显著差异。中位随访36个月(四分位间距12-60)后,8例(8.1%)患者患有慢性肾脏病,4例(4.1%)永久性透析,7例(7.1%)复发,两组在这些最终结局上无显著差异。不良事件包括感染(CYC组)、皮疹和中性粒细胞减少(MMF组),两组在发生频率上无显著差异。诱导治疗失败(风险比[HR]=10.626,P = 0.022)和LN诊断时的肌酐水平(HR = 8.397,P = 0.007)与经LN诊断时的年龄、病程和蛋白尿校正后的肾脏生存显著相关。

结论

目前LN诱导治疗的反应良好,诱导治疗后6个月的反应是肾脏生存的最重要预测因素。

相似文献

1
Outcome and predictors of renal survival in patients with lupus nephritis: Comparison between cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil.狼疮性肾炎患者肾脏存活的结局及预测因素:环磷酰胺与霉酚酸酯的比较
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 May;21(5):1031-1039. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13274. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
Long-term outcomes of lupus nephritis treated with regimens based on cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil.基于环磷酰胺和霉酚酸酯的方案治疗狼疮肾炎的长期结局。
Lupus. 2020 Jul;29(8):845-853. doi: 10.1177/0961203320926256. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
Long-term renal survival of paediatric patients with lupus nephritis.儿童狼疮肾炎患者的长期肾脏生存情况。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 May 25;37(6):1069-1077. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab152.
4
Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial.低剂量霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺用于尼泊尔人群狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗的对比:一项随机对照试验
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0973-7.
5
Comparison of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide with oral mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of lupus nephritis.低剂量静脉注射环磷酰胺与口服吗替麦考酚酯治疗狼疮性肾炎的比较。
Kidney Int. 2016 Jan;89(1):235-42. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.318. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Rituximab vs mycophenolate and vs cyclophosphamide pulses for induction therapy of active lupus nephritis: a clinical observational study.利妥昔单抗与吗替麦考酚酯和环磷酰胺脉冲治疗狼疮性肾炎活动诱导:一项临床观察研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Sep;53(9):1570-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket462. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
7
Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: a randomised controlled trial and long-term follow-up.他克莫司与霉酚酸酯治疗狼疮性肾炎诱导缓解的随机对照试验及长期随访
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):30-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206456. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Comparison of Lupus Nephritis Induction Treatments in a Hispanic Population: A Single-center Cohort Analysis.西班牙裔人群狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗的比较:单中心队列分析
J Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;42(11):2082-91. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150395. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
Pilot study comparing the childhood arthritis and rheumatology research alliance consensus treatment plans for induction therapy of juvenile proliferative lupus nephritis.比较儿童关节炎和风湿病研究联盟针对青少年增殖性狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗的共识治疗方案的初步研究。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018 Oct 22;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0279-0.
10
A Comparison Of Mycophenolate Mofetil And Cyclophosphamide As Lupus Nephritis Induction Therapy.霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺治疗狼疮性肾炎的比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(4):454-458.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy of Induction Treatment with a Cyclophosphamide- or Mycophenolate Mofetil-Based Regimen for Active Lupus Nephritis in Thailand: A Retrospective Cohort Study.泰国环磷酰胺或霉酚酸酯诱导治疗活动性狼疮性肾炎的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究
Glomerular Dis. 2025 Feb 28;5(1):151-157. doi: 10.1159/000545014. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
gene polymorphisms are associated with cyclophosphamide effectiveness in lupus nephritis patients: A case-control study in Indonesia.基因多态性与狼疮性肾炎患者环磷酰胺疗效相关:印度尼西亚的一项病例对照研究。
Narra J. 2024 Dec;4(3):e1144. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.1144. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
MOONLIGHT study: the design of a comparative study of the effectiveness of belimumab in patients with a history of lupus nephritis from the post-Marketed effectiveness of belimumab cOhOrt and JapaN Lupus NatIonwide reGistry (LUNA) coHorT.
月光研究:一项贝丽珠单抗对比治疗狼疮肾炎患者有效性的研究设计,该研究基于贝丽珠单抗上市后疗效的 Cohort 研究和日本狼疮全国注册登记研究(LUNA)。
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000746.
4
Renal response and its predictive factors of lupus nephritis: a 2-year real-world study of 56 hospital-based patients.狼疮肾炎的肾脏反应及其预测因素:56 例基于医院的患者的 2 年真实世界研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Nov;41(11):3363-3371. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06258-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Lupus Nephritis: Improving Treatment Options.狼疮性肾炎:改善治疗选择
Drugs. 2022 May;82(7):735-748. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01715-1. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Common Induction Therapies for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.利妥昔单抗与狼疮肾炎常见诱导治疗的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2022 Apr 4;13:859380. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859380. eCollection 2022.
7
Management of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the joint EULAR and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations.狼疮肾炎的治疗:系统文献回顾为 2019 年更新的 EULAR 和欧洲肾脏学会-欧洲透析和移植学会(EULAR/ERA-EDTA)建议提供信息。
RMD Open. 2020 Jul;6(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001263.
8
Effectiveness and safety of common therapeutic drugs for refractory lupus nephritis: A network meta-analysis.难治性狼疮性肾炎常用治疗药物的有效性和安全性:一项网状Meta分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Jan;19(1):665-671. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8257. Epub 2019 Nov 29.