Suppr超能文献

护士从业者和医生为 Medicare 受益人群提供的初级护理质量。

Quality of Primary Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries by Nurse Practitioners and Physicians.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.

Boston College, School of Nursing, Brandeis University, Waltham.

出版信息

Med Care. 2018 Jun;56(6):484-490. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000908.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in the quality of care provided by primary care nurse practitioners (PCNPs), primary care physicians (PCMDs), or both clinicians.

DATA SOURCES

Medicare part A and part B claims during 2012-2013.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort design using standard risk-adjustment methodologies and propensity score weighting assessing 16 claims-based quality measures grouped into 4 domains of primary care: chronic disease management, preventable hospitalizations, adverse outcomes, and cancer screening.

EXTRACTION METHODS

Continuously enrolled aged, disabled, and dual eligible beneficiaries who received at least 25% of their primary care services from a random sample of PCMDs, PCNPs, or both clinicians.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Beneficiaries attributed to PCNPs had lower hospital admissions, readmissions, inappropriate emergency department use, and low-value imaging for low back pain. Beneficiaries attributed to PCMDs were more likely than those attributed to PCNPs to receive chronic disease management and cancer screenings. Quality of care for beneficiaries jointly attributed to both clinicians generally scored in the middle of the PCNP and PCMD attributed beneficiaries with the exception of cancer screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of primary care varies by clinician type, with different strengths for PCNPs and PCMDs. These comparative advantages should be considered when determining how to organize primary care to Medicare beneficiaries.

摘要

目的

考察初级保健护士从业者(PCNPs)、初级保健医生(PCMDs)或两者联合提供的护理质量差异。

数据来源

2012-2013 年医疗保险 A 部分和 B 部分的索赔数据。

研究设计

使用标准风险调整方法和倾向评分加权的回顾性队列设计,评估了基于 16 项索赔的质量指标,这些指标分为四个初级保健领域:慢性病管理、可预防的住院治疗、不良后果和癌症筛查。

提取方法

从 PCMDs、PCNPs 或两者联合临床医生的随机样本中连续招募年龄较大、残疾和双重合格的受益人群,他们至少有 25%的初级保健服务来自这些医生。

主要发现

被分配给 PCNPs 的受益人群的住院、再入院、不适当的急诊部使用和低价值的腰痛影像学检查较少。与被分配给 PCNPs 的受益人群相比,被分配给 PCMDs 的受益人群更有可能接受慢性病管理和癌症筛查。联合分配给两者的受益人群的护理质量一般处于 PCNP 和 PCMD 分配受益人群的中间,除了癌症筛查。

结论

临床医生类型的不同会导致初级保健质量的差异,PCNPs 和 PCMDs 各有优势。在确定如何向 Medicare 受益人群组织初级保健时,应考虑这些比较优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验