Suppr超能文献

急性后期过渡到居家支持性护理(PATHS):一种由执业护士主导的新型远程医疗干预措施,旨在改善临终肿瘤护理。

Post-Acute Transition to Home With Supportive Care (PATHS): A Novel Nurse Practitioner-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve End-of-Life Oncology Care.

作者信息

Rosa William E, Epstein Andrew S, Lauria Tara, Qualters Kelley, Kapoor-Hintzen Neena, Knezevic Andrea, Egan Barbara, Levine Marcia, Koo Douglas Junwoo, Gandham Ashley, Nelson Judith E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (W.E.R.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of Medicine (A.S.E., D.J.K., B.E., J.E.N.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Supportive Care Service (A.S.E., T.L., K.Q., N.K.H., D.J.K., J.E.N.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College (J.E.N.), New York, New York.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 May;69(5):496-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 17.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Patients with advanced cancer discharged from the hospital with no plan for further disease-directed treatment (on 'best supportive care'; BSC) and without specialized palliative care at home are extremely vulnerable to end-of-life suffering and hospital readmission.

OBJECTIVES

To assess preliminary outcomes of PATHS (Post-Acute Transition to Home with Supportive Care), a nurse practitioner-led telehealth intervention delivering proactive, intensive, specialized palliative care in the immediate two-week post-discharge period.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm prospective quality improvement evaluation of PATHS with patients ≥21 years with advanced solid tumor malignancies discharged from the hospital on BSC having initially declined hospice. Sociodemographic and illness characteristics, index hospital admission (IHA) and discharge data, and PATHS outcomes were descriptively analyzed. Competing-risks analysis provided cumulative incidence of hospital readmission following IHA discharge (primary outcome).

RESULTS

Patients (n = 30) had a median age of 67 years and were predominantly female (53%) and white (63%). Colorectal cancer was the most common diagnosis (30%) and pain the most common IHA reason (33%). The 30-day cumulative incidence of hospital readmission was 33% (95% CI: 16, 51) compared to a historical control rate of 43% (95% CI: 26, 59). No patient receiving timely hospice care at home was readmitted to the hospital. At PATHS completion, 11 patients (36%) had transitioned to hospice, nine of whom accepted a hospice referral during their first PATHS visit.

CONCLUSION

PATHS fills a substantive practice gap, potentially reducing end-of-life hospital readmissions while increasing home-based, specialized palliative care access for BSC patients with cancer approaching death after hospitalization.

摘要

背景

晚期癌症患者出院时没有进一步疾病导向治疗计划(接受“最佳支持治疗”;BSC)且家中没有专业姑息治疗,极易遭受临终痛苦并再次入院。

目的

评估PATHS(急性后期过渡到家庭支持治疗)的初步结果,这是一项由执业护士主导的远程医疗干预措施,在出院后的两周内提供主动、强化、专业的姑息治疗。

方法

我们对PATHS进行了单臂前瞻性质量改进评估,研究对象为年龄≥21岁、因晚期实体瘤恶性肿瘤从医院出院且最初拒绝临终关怀的BSC患者。对社会人口统计学和疾病特征、首次住院(IHA)和出院数据以及PATHS结果进行了描述性分析。竞争风险分析提供了IHA出院后再次入院的累积发生率(主要结局)。

结果

患者(n = 30)的中位年龄为67岁,主要为女性(53%)和白人(63%)。结直肠癌是最常见的诊断(30%),疼痛是最常见的IHA原因(33%)。再次入院的30天累积发生率为33%(95%CI:16,51),而历史对照率为43%(95%CI:26,59)。没有在家中接受及时临终关怀的患者再次入院。在PATHS结束时,11名患者(36%)已过渡到临终关怀,其中9人在首次PATHS就诊期间接受了临终关怀转诊。

结论

PATHS填补了一个实质性的实践空白,可能减少临终时的再次入院,同时增加了对住院后接近死亡的BSC癌症患者的家庭专业姑息治疗机会。

相似文献

1
急性后期过渡到居家支持性护理(PATHS):一种由执业护士主导的新型远程医疗干预措施,旨在改善临终肿瘤护理。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 May;69(5):496-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
通过结构化的护士执业医师/注册护士过渡性中风项目减少中风后的再入院。
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1599-604. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012524. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
居家相伴:农村居家临终关怀背景下,针对癌症患儿的儿科姑息治疗远程医疗支持。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Apr;68(4):e28921. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28921. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
4
再次入住急性姑息/支持性护理病房的晚期癌症患者的特征。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jun;25(6):1947-1952. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3604-0. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
5
出院后接受居家临终关怀护理的老年人再次住院情况。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;17(7):841-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0224. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
6
台湾癌症患者接受住院姑息治疗后的再入院情况:一项基于全国人口的9年队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2782. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002782.
7
针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
8
基于执业护士的居家专科姑息治疗模式:可持续性与可行性评估
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
10
在综合医疗体系中对心力衰竭住院患者进行过渡护理计划的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027410. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27410.

本文引用的文献

1
远程医疗如何用于增加专科姑息治疗的可及性?一项系统综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Apr;69(4):e303-e314. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.017. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
居家临终关怀中的共享药物规划以应对药物治疗方案复杂性和家庭照顾者负担:简要报告
J Palliat Med. 2024 Dec;27(12):1653-1656. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0229. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
护士电话支持对老年患者出院后照顾者的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2441019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41019.
4
重视家庭照顾者负担的重要性:心理健康护理提供中的挑战。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Jun;32(2):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10051-3. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
5
评估姑息治疗中的远程医疗:对农村和服务不足地区的有效性及挑战的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68275. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68275. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
癌症患者的临终成本:一项系统综述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Sep;42(9):932-961. doi: 10.1177/10499091241285890. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
7
应用数字健康在晚期癌症患者姑息治疗中的效果:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 17;32(10):664. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08866-9.
9
仍可做的一切:在为癌症患者推荐启动临终关怀时进行精准且以患者为中心的沟通。
Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35558. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35558. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
10
延续性:为住院晚期癌症患者提供的一种出院后支持性护理干预。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):613-621.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验