• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

执业护士的诊断推理与认知偏差

Diagnostic Reasoning and Cognitive Biases of Nurse Practitioners.

作者信息

Lawson Thomas N

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2018 Apr 1;57(4):203-208. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180322-03.

DOI:10.3928/01484834-20180322-03
PMID:29614188
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic reasoning is often used colloquially to describe the process by which nurse practitioners and physicians come to the correct diagnosis, but a rich definition and description of this process has been lacking in the nursing literature.

METHOD

A literature review was conducted with theoretical sampling seeking conceptual insight into diagnostic reasoning.

RESULTS

Four common themes emerged: Cognitive Biases and Debiasing Strategies, the Dual Process Theory, Diagnostic Error, and Patient Harm. Relevant cognitive biases are discussed, followed by debiasing strategies and application of the dual process theory to reduce diagnostic error and harm.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of diagnostic reasoning of nurse practitioners may be improved by incorporating these items into nurse practitioner education and practice. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(4):203-208.].

摘要

背景

诊断推理通常通俗地用于描述执业护士和医生得出正确诊断的过程,但护理文献中一直缺乏对这一过程丰富的定义和描述。

方法

采用理论抽样进行文献综述,以寻求对诊断推理的概念性见解。

结果

出现了四个共同主题:认知偏差与去偏策略、双过程理论、诊断错误和患者伤害。文中讨论了相关的认知偏差,随后介绍了去偏策略以及双过程理论在减少诊断错误和伤害方面的应用。

结论

将这些内容纳入执业护士教育和实践中,可能会提高执业护士诊断推理的准确性。[《护理教育杂志》。2018年;57(4):203 - 208。]

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Reasoning and Cognitive Biases of Nurse Practitioners.执业护士的诊断推理与认知偏差
J Nurs Educ. 2018 Apr 1;57(4):203-208. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180322-03.
2
Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing.认知去偏倚 1:偏倚的起源和去偏倚理论。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii58-ii64. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
3
Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.教授批判性思维:以认知偏差教学减少诊断错误和提高患者安全的案例。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.
4
Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change.认知去偏 2:改变的障碍和策略。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii65-ii72. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Review of the Basics of Cognitive Error in Emergency Medicine: Still No Easy Answers.急诊医学中认知错误基础的回顾:仍无简单答案。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 2;21(6):125-131. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47832.
6
Cognitive Debiasing Strategies: A Faculty Development Workshop for Clinical Teachers in Emergency Medicine.认知去偏策略:面向急诊医学临床教师的教师发展研讨会
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Oct 23;13:10646. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10646.
7
A mixed-methods exploration of cognitive dispositions to respond and clinical reasoning errors with multiple choice questions.一种混合方法探索认知倾向反应和多选题临床推理错误。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 23;18(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1372-2.
8
Education initiatives in cognitive debiasing to improve diagnostic accuracy in student providers: A scoping review.认知去偏教育干预以提高学生提供者诊断准确性的研究:范围综述。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020 Aug 7;33(11):862-871. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000479.
9
An analysis of expert nurse practitioners' diagnostic reasoning.专家执业护士的诊断推理分析。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2003 Mar;15(3):137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00270.x.
10
Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review.增强诊断推理的双过程认知干预:一项系统综述
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):808-20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004417. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review: Diagnostic reasoning as a component of clinical reasoning in the U.S. primary care nurse practitioner education.范围综述:美国初级保健执业护士教育中的诊断推理作为临床推理的一个组成部分。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Dec;78(12):3869-3896. doi: 10.1111/jan.15414. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
2
An Iterative and Collaborative End-to-End Methodology Applied to Digital Mental Health.一种应用于数字心理健康的迭代协作式端到端方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 23;12:574440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.574440. eCollection 2021.