• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development.

作者信息

Wieringa Sietse, Dreesens Dunja, Forland Frode, Hulshof Carel, Lukersmith Sue, Macbeth Fergus, Shaw Beth, van Vliet Arlène, Zuiderent-Jerak Teun

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Jun;23(3):87-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844
PMID:29615396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5969373/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development.不同的知识，不同的推理方式：对指南制定的一项挑战。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Jun;23(3):87-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
The necessity for clinical reasoning in the era of evidence-based medicine.循证医学时代临床推理的必要性。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Oct;88(10):1108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.012.
3
Practice guidelines: belief, criticism, and probability.实践指南：信念、批评与概率。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):15-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.453.
4
What evidence, whose evidence?: Physical therapy in New York State's clinical practice guideline and in the lives of mothers of disabled children.什么证据，谁的证据？：纽约州临床实践指南中的物理治疗以及残疾儿童母亲的生活
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2670-80. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.028. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
5
Measuring the importance of PSA velocity.测量前列腺特异抗原速度的重要性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 16;103(6):454-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr086. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
6
Practice guidelines: pedantic pontification or pragmatic progress? 2003 Ryley-Jeffs Memorial Lecture.实践指南：迂腐的说教还是务实的进步？2003年赖利 - 杰弗斯纪念讲座
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2003 Fall;64(3):142-6. doi: 10.3148/64.3.2003.142.
7
Determinants of guideline use in primary care physical therapy: a cross-sectional survey of attitudes, knowledge, and behavior.基层医疗物理治疗中指南使用的决定因素：态度、知识和行为的横断面调查。
Phys Ther. 2014 Mar;94(3):343-54. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130147. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
8
[Development of the evidence-based guidelines for psoriasis--a project of the German Dermatological Society (DDG)].[银屑病循证指南的制定——德国皮肤病学会（DDG）的一个项目]
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005 Sep;3(9):678-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2005.05062.x.
9
Perceptions and attitudes towards different grading systems from clinical guidelines developers.临床指南制定者对不同分级系统的认知与态度。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1074-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01319.x.
10
Physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines: does it really matter?医生对临床实践指南的遵循：这真的重要吗？
Am Heart J. 2003 Jan;145(1):13-5. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.25.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathway to developing paediatric non-communicable disease guidelines in Malawi: a scoping review.马拉维制定儿童非传染性疾病指南的途径：一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):1186. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13410-4.
2
Challenges in the Implementation of EU Risk Minimisation Measures for Medicinal Products in Clinical Practice Guidelines: Mixed Methods Multi-Case Study.欧盟药品风险最小化措施在临床实践指南中的实施挑战：混合方法多案例研究
Drug Saf. 2025 Feb;48(2):161-177. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01487-5. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
3
"Going into the black box": a policy analysis of how the World Health Organization uses evidence to inform guideline recommendations.“进入黑箱”：世界卫生组织如何利用证据为指南建议提供信息的政策分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;12:1292475. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292475. eCollection 2024.
4
Co-design workshops to develop evidence synthesis summary formats for use by clinical guideline development groups.共同设计工作坊，制定证据综合摘要格式，供临床指南制定小组使用。
Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 27;13(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02518-z.
5
Making sustainable healthcare decisions: three turns towards sustainable guidelines.做出可持续的医疗决策：迈向可持续指南的三个转变。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jul 23;29(4):219-222. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112352.
6
Perspectives on how to build bridges between regulation, health technology assessment and clinical guideline development: a qualitative focus group study with European experts.关于如何在监管、卫生技术评估和临床指南制定之间架起桥梁的观点：一项与欧洲专家进行的定性焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 28;13(8):e072309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072309.
7
Capturing Emerging Experiential Knowledge for Vaccination Guidelines Through Natural Language Processing: Proof-of-Concept Study.通过自然语言处理捕获疫苗接种指南中的新兴经验知识：概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 14;25:e44461. doi: 10.2196/44461.
8
Negotiating with digital self-monitoring: A qualitative study on how patients with multiple sclerosis use and experience digital self-monitoring within a scientific study.与数字自我监测协商：一项关于多发性硬化症患者在科学研究中如何使用和体验数字自我监测的定性研究。
Health (London). 2024 May;28(3):333-351. doi: 10.1177/13634593231175321. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Identifying experts for clinical practice guidelines: perspectives from the ASH Guideline Oversight Subcommittee.确定临床实践指南的专家：来自美国血液学会指南监督小组委员会的观点
Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 22;7(16):4323-4326. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010039.
10
How to improve the dissemination of clinical practice guidelines in the Brazilian Unified Health System? Report of a pilot project.如何提高巴西统一卫生系统中临床实践指南的传播？试点项目报告。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Mar 23;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00966-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估：简介系列。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3.
2
From the EBM pyramid to the Greek temple: a new conceptual approach to Guidelines as implementation tools in mental health.从循证医学金字塔到希腊神庙：一种新的概念方法，将指南作为心理健康的实施工具。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Apr;26(2):105-114. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000767.
3
The One or the Many: Quantified Subjectivity and Aggregated Uniqueness in Qualitative Rehabilitation Research.一或多：定性康复研究中的量化主观性与聚合独特性
Qual Health Res. 2017 Jan;27(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/1049732316668297. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
4
Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual).在卫生和社会干预决策中使用定性证据：一种评估定性证据综合结果可信度的方法（GRADE-CERQual）
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895. eCollection 2015 Oct.
5
Towards a framework for evaluating and grading evidence in public health.构建公共卫生证据评估与分级框架
Health Policy. 2015 Jun;119(6):732-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
6
Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences.《智人启发式：为何有偏见的思维能做出更好的推断》
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):107-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.
7
An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development: exploring the potential for articulating patient knowledge in evidence-based epistemic settings.患者参与指南制定的实证研究：探索在循证认知环境中阐明患者知识的潜力。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):942-55. doi: 10.1111/hex.12067. Epub 2013 May 2.
8
Guidelines should reflect all knowledge, not just clinical trials.指南应反映所有知识，而不仅仅是临床试验。
BMJ. 2012 Oct 5;345:e6702. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6702.
9
Causation and evidence-based practice: an ontological review.因果关系与循证实践：本体论研究综述。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;18(5):1006-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01908.x.
10
A knowledge infrastructure for occupational safety and health.职业安全与健康知识基础设施。
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Dec;52(12):1262-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318202f2c5.