• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Identifying experts for clinical practice guidelines: perspectives from the ASH Guideline Oversight Subcommittee.

作者信息

Byrne Michael, Mattison Ryan, Bercovitz Rachel, Lottenberg Richard, Rezende Suely M, Silverstein Roy, Terrell Deirdra, Kunkle Rob, Smith Deion, Bollard Catherine, Haberichter Sandra, Holter-Chakrabarty Jennifer, Pai Menaka, Cheung Matthew, Cuker Adam, Seftel Matthew, Djulbegovic Benjamin

机构信息

Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 22;7(16):4323-4326. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010039.

DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010039
PMID:37186271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10424133/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c4/10424133/44203fbdb3c2/BLOODA_ADV-2023-010039-gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c4/10424133/44203fbdb3c2/BLOODA_ADV-2023-010039-gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9c4/10424133/44203fbdb3c2/BLOODA_ADV-2023-010039-gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying experts for clinical practice guidelines: perspectives from the ASH Guideline Oversight Subcommittee.确定临床实践指南的专家：来自美国血液学会指南监督小组委员会的观点
Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 22;7(16):4323-4326. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010039.
2
ASH Guideline Oversight Subcommittee Response to Jacobs et al regarding Industry Payments to ASH Guideline Panelists.美国血液学会指南监督小组委员会就行业向美国血液学会指南小组成员付款一事对雅各布斯等人的回应。
Blood Adv. 2024 Jul 9;8(13):3553-3554. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013293.
3
Clinical practice guideline: Otitis media with effusion.临床实践指南：中耳积液
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5 Suppl):S95-118. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.02.002.
4
Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version.日本胃肠道间质瘤（GIST）临床实践指南：英文版
Int J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct;13(5):416-30. doi: 10.1007/s10147-008-0798-7. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
5
Otitis media with effusion.分泌性中耳炎
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):1412-29. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1412.
6
Clinical practice guideline: treatment of the school-aged child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.临床实践指南：学龄期注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童的治疗
Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):1033-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.1033.
7
Methodological background and strategy for the 2012-2013 updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the abdominal compartment society.腹内压协会2012 - 2013年更新的共识定义和临床实践指南的方法学背景与策略
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47 Spec No:s63-77. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0081. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
Development and implementation of stroke guidelines: the WSO Guidelines Subcommittee takes the first step (Part one of a two-part series on the work of the WSO Stroke Guidelines Subcommittee).中风指南的制定与实施：世界卒中组织指南小组委员会迈出第一步（关于世界卒中组织中风指南小组委员会工作的系列文章两部分中的第一部分）
Int J Stroke. 2011 Apr;6(2):155-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00572.x.
9
Erythropoietin use in oncology: a summary of the evidence and practice guidelines comparing efforts of the Cochrane Review group and Blue Cross/Blue Shield to set up the ASCO/ASH guidelines.促红细胞生成素在肿瘤学中的应用：比较Cochrane综述小组与蓝十字蓝盾公司制定美国临床肿瘤学会/美国血液学会指南工作的证据总结与实践指南
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005;18(3):455-66. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2005.01.023.
10
[Conception and testing of a regional practice guideline using bronchial asthma as an example].[以支气管哮喘为例的区域实践指南的构想与测试]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Jun;94(5):351-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy differences in detecting wound maceration between humans and artificial intelligence: the role of human expertise revisited.人类与人工智能在检测伤口浸渍方面的诊断准确性差异：重新审视人类专业知识的作用
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Sep 1;32(9):1425-1433. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf116.
2
Advancing Precision Medicine in PDAC: An Ethical Scoping Review and Call to Action for IHC Implementation.推进胰腺癌的精准医学：免疫组化实施的伦理范围审查及行动呼吁
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;17(12):1899. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121899.
3
Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity.

本文引用的文献

1
Deliberate Practice at the Virtual Bedside to Improve Clinical Reasoning.在虚拟床边进行刻意练习以提高临床推理能力。
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 19;386(20):1946-1947. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2204540. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Certainty of evidence and intervention's benefits and harms are key determinants of guidelines' recommendations.证据的确凿性和干预措施的获益与危害是指南推荐的关键决定因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.
面板堆叠对共识声明的有效性构成威胁。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111428. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111428. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
ASH Guideline Oversight Subcommittee Response to Jacobs et al regarding Industry Payments to ASH Guideline Panelists.美国血液学会指南监督小组委员会就行业向美国血液学会指南小组成员付款一事对雅各布斯等人的回应。
Blood Adv. 2024 Jul 9;8(13):3553-3554. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013293.
结构化决策推动指南小组推荐“支持”而非“反对”健康干预措施。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
Professional Societies Should Abstain From Authorship of Guidelines and Disease Definition Statements.专业学会应避免撰写指南和疾病定义声明。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Oct;11(10):e004889. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004889.
5
Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development.不同的知识，不同的推理方式：对指南制定的一项挑战。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Jun;23(3):87-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
6
The Cochrane Review Conclusion for Hepatitis C DAA Therapies is Wrong.关于丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物疗法的Cochrane系统评价结论是错误的。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;113(1):2-4. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.420. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Expertise: no longer a sine qua non for guideline authors?
J Hypertens. 2017 Aug;35(8):1564-1566. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001435.
8
Guidelines Under Fire Again!
Hypertension. 2017 Aug;70(2):238-239. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09725. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
9
Physician age and outcomes in elderly patients in hospital in the US: observational study.美国住院老年患者的医生年龄与治疗结果：观察性研究
BMJ. 2017 May 16;357:j1797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1797.
10
Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on.循证医学的进展：二十五年的历程。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):415-423. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6. Epub 2017 Feb 17.