• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对健康参与者的额下回施加阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)时,对工作记忆和言语流畅性任务无影响。

Null Effects on Working Memory and Verbal Fluency Tasks When Applying Anodal tDCS to the Inferior Frontal Gyrus of Healthy Participants.

作者信息

Westwood Samuel J, Romani Cristina

机构信息

School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 19;12:166. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00166. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2018.00166
PMID:29615855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867342/
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique used to modify cognition by modulating underlying cortical excitability via weak electric current applied through the scalp. Although many studies have reported positive effects with tDCS, a number of recent studies highlight that tDCS effects can be small and difficult to reproduce. This is especially the case when attempting to modulate performance using single applications of tDCS in healthy participants. Possible reasons may be that optimal stimulation parameters have yet to be identified, and that individual variation in cortical activity and/or level of ability confound outcomes. To address these points, we carried out a series of experiments in which we attempted to modulate performance in fluency and working memory probe tasks using stimulation parameters which have been associated with positive outcomes: we targeted the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and compared performance when applying a 1.5 mA anodal current for 25 min and with sham stimulation. There is evidence that LIFG plays a role in these tasks and previous studies have found positive effects of stimulation. We also compared our experimental group ( = 19-20) with a control group receiving no stimulation ( = 24). More importantly, we also considered effects on subgroups subdivided according to memory span as well as to more direct measures of executive function abilities and motivational levels. We found no systematic effect of stimulation. Our findings are in line with a growing body of evidence that tDCS produces unreliable effects. We acknowledge that our findings speak to the conditions we investigated, and that alternative protocols (e.g., multiple sessions, clinical samples, and different stimulation polarities) may be more effective. We encourage further research to explore optimal conditions for tDCS efficacy, given the potential benefits that this technique poses for understanding and enhancing cognition.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种通过经头皮施加弱电流来调节潜在皮质兴奋性从而改变认知的技术。尽管许多研究报告了tDCS的积极效果,但最近的一些研究强调,tDCS的效果可能很小且难以重复。在健康参与者中尝试使用单次tDCS来调节表现时尤其如此。可能的原因是尚未确定最佳刺激参数,并且皮质活动和/或能力水平的个体差异会混淆结果。为了解决这些问题,我们进行了一系列实验,在实验中我们尝试使用与积极结果相关的刺激参数来调节流畅性和工作记忆探测任务中的表现:我们将目标定为左侧额下回(LIFG),并比较了施加1.5 mA阳极电流25分钟时与伪刺激时的表现。有证据表明LIFG在这些任务中起作用,并且先前的研究已经发现了刺激的积极效果。我们还将我们的实验组(n = 19 - 20)与未接受刺激的对照组(n = 24)进行了比较。更重要的是,我们还考虑了对根据记忆跨度以及执行功能能力和动机水平的更直接测量进行细分的亚组的影响。我们没有发现刺激的系统性效果。我们的发现与越来越多的证据一致,即tDCS产生不可靠的效果。我们承认我们的发现适用于我们所研究的条件,并且替代方案(例如多次疗程、临床样本和不同的刺激极性)可能更有效。鉴于该技术对理解和增强认知具有潜在益处,我们鼓励进一步研究以探索tDCS疗效的最佳条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/4f2e67635506/fnins-12-00166-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/e31a81168254/fnins-12-00166-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/1059eb325b2b/fnins-12-00166-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/942e39837fd6/fnins-12-00166-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/c8a41f52dc21/fnins-12-00166-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/45e8cb120c29/fnins-12-00166-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/207c9f6cf6c1/fnins-12-00166-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/4f2e67635506/fnins-12-00166-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/e31a81168254/fnins-12-00166-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/1059eb325b2b/fnins-12-00166-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/942e39837fd6/fnins-12-00166-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/c8a41f52dc21/fnins-12-00166-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/45e8cb120c29/fnins-12-00166-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/207c9f6cf6c1/fnins-12-00166-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd75/5867342/4f2e67635506/fnins-12-00166-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Null Effects on Working Memory and Verbal Fluency Tasks When Applying Anodal tDCS to the Inferior Frontal Gyrus of Healthy Participants.对健康参与者的额下回施加阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)时,对工作记忆和言语流畅性任务无影响。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 19;12:166. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00166. eCollection 2018.
2
Boosting Cognition: Effects of Multiple-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory.增强认知:多疗程经颅直流电刺激对工作记忆的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Apr;29(4):755-768. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01077. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
3
Differential effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation on verbal working memory performance according to sensory modality.根据感觉模态,高清经颅直流电刺激对言语工作记忆表现的不同影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Nov 20;687:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.09.047. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
4
Failure to Improve Verbal Fluency with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.经颅直流电刺激未能改善言语流畅性。
Neuroscience. 2020 Nov 21;449:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Balanced bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances working memory in adults with high-functioning autism: a sham-controlled crossover study.平衡双额叶经颅直流电刺激增强高功能自闭症成年人的工作记忆:一项假刺激对照交叉研究。
Mol Autism. 2017 Jul 28;8:40. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0152-x. eCollection 2017.
6
No Evidence That Baseline Prefrontal Cortical Excitability (3T-MRS) Predicts the Effects of Prefrontal tDCS on WM Performance.无证据表明基线前额叶皮质兴奋性(3T磁共振波谱)可预测前额叶经颅直流电刺激对工作记忆表现的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 17;12:481. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00481. eCollection 2018.
7
Randomized, crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind study of transcranial direct current stimulation of left DLPFC on executive functions .经颅直流电刺激左背外侧前额叶皮质对执行功能影响的随机、交叉、假刺激对照、双盲研究。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(6):755-766. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180872.
8
Differential role of prefrontal, temporal and parietal cortices in verbal and figural fluency: Implications for the supramodal contribution of executive functions.前额叶、颞叶和顶叶皮质在言语流畅性和图形流畅性中的差异作用:对执行功能的超模式贡献的启示。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 6;9(1):3700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40273-7.
9
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation May Improve Discourse Production in Healthy Older Adults.经颅直流电刺激可能改善健康老年人的话语表达能力。
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 26;11:935. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00935. eCollection 2020.
10
Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.2mA 经颅直流电刺激后的个体内反应一致性和可靠性。
Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
TDCS over PPC or DLPFC does not improve visual working memory capacity.经颅直流电刺激前额顶叶皮质或背外侧前额叶皮质并不能提高视觉工作记忆容量。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Mar 11;2(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00067-8.
2
Lack of effects of online HD-tDCS over the left or right DLPFC in an associative memory and metamemory monitoring task.在联想记忆和元记忆监测任务中,左或右背外侧前额叶皮质的线上 HD-tDCS 无影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0300779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300779. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Cathodal tDCS of the bilateral anterior temporal lobes facilitates semantically-driven verbal fluency.双侧颞叶前部阴极经颅直流电刺激促进语义驱动的言语流畅性。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
2
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulation of picture naming and word reading: A meta-analysis of single session tDCS applied to healthy participants.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对图片命名和单词阅读的调制:单次 tDCS 应用于健康参与者的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Sep;104:234-249. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
经颅直流电刺激对多种健康结局的影响及安全性:随机临床试验的系统综述
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;29(12):3789-3801. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02624-3. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Treating lexical retrieval using letter fluency and tDCS in primary progressive aphasia: a single-case study.在原发性进行性失语症中使用字母流畅性和经颅直流电刺激治疗词汇检索:一项单病例研究。
Aphasiology. 2022;36(3):353-379. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2021.1881432. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Executive functions in patients with bilateral and unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction.双侧和单侧周围性前庭功能障碍患者的执行功能。
J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3291-3308. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12267-7. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
6
Template MRI scans reliably approximate individual and group-level tES and TMS electric fields induced in motor and prefrontal circuits.模板 MRI 扫描可靠地近似于个体和群体水平的 tES 和 TMS 诱导的运动和前额叶回路中的电场。
Front Neural Circuits. 2023 Sep 6;17:1214959. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1214959. eCollection 2023.
7
Differential effects of remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation on recognition memory depending on task order.根据任务顺序,远程监督经颅直流电刺激对识别记忆的不同影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Aug 9;17:1239126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1239126. eCollection 2023.
8
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Modulation of Aggressive Behavior-A Systematic Review of Randomized Sham-Controlled Studies.用于调节攻击行为的非侵入性脑刺激——随机假对照研究的系统评价
Life (Basel). 2023 May 20;13(5):1220. doi: 10.3390/life13051220.
9
Attention neuroenhancement through tDCS or neurofeedback: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.经 tDCS 或神经反馈进行的神经增强注意力:一项随机、单盲、对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 20;12(1):17613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22245-6.
10
[Effects of parameters selection with transcranial direct current stimulation based on real head model].[基于真实头部模型的经颅直流电刺激参数选择的影响]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 25;38(4):638-646. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202005050.
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neural Networks in Young and Older Adults.
经颅直流电刺激对年轻和老年人大脑神经网络的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1817-1828. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01166. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Functional consequences of inhibitory plasticity: homeostasis, the excitation-inhibition balance and beyond.抑制性可塑性的功能后果:内稳性、兴奋-抑制平衡及超越。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2017 Apr;43:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Cognitive Enhancement Induced by Anodal tDCS Drives Circuit-Specific Cortical Plasticity.经阳极 tDCS 诱导的认知增强作用驱动特定于回路的皮质可塑性。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Apr 1;28(4):1132-1140. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx021.
6
Individual Differences and State-Dependent Responses in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.经颅直流电刺激中的个体差异与状态依赖性反应
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 21;10:643. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00643. eCollection 2016.
7
Limits to tDCS effects in language: Failures to modulate word production in healthy participants with frontal or temporal tDCS.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对语言影响的局限性:对健康参与者进行额叶或颞叶tDCS未能调节词汇生成。
Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:64-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Increased contextual cue utilization with tDCS over the prefrontal cortex during a recognition task.在识别任务期间,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作用于前额叶皮质时,情境线索利用率增加。
Brain Res. 2017 Jan 15;1655:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
9
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the parietal cortex alters bias in item and source memory tasks.经颅直流电刺激顶叶皮层会改变项目记忆和源记忆任务中的偏向。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Oct;108:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
Working memory capacity differentially influences responses to tDCS and HD-tDCS in a retro-cue task.在一项回溯线索任务中,工作记忆容量对经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和高频经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)的反应有不同影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Aug 26;629:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.06.056. Epub 2016 Jun 28.