Jiang Shuangke, Jones Myles, von Bastian Claudia C
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Commun Psychol. 2024 Mar 11;2(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00067-8.
Non-invasive brain stimulation has been highlighted as a possible intervention to induce cognitive benefits, including on visual working memory (VWM). However, findings are inconsistent, possibly due to methodological issues. A recent high-profile study by Wang et al. reported that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over posterior parietal cortex (PPC), but not over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), selectively improved VWM capacity but not precision, especially at a high VWM load. Thus, in the current pre-registered conceptual replication study, we accounted for the key potential methodological issues in the original study and tested an adequate number of participants required to demonstrate the previously reported effects (n = 48 compared to n = 20). Participants underwent counterbalanced PPC, DLPFC and sham stimulation before completing 360 trials of a continuous orientation-reproduction task with a slight variation of task stimuli and setup. We found no evidence for the selective effect of PPC stimulation. Instead, our results showed that tDCS effects were absent regardless of stimulation region and VWM load, which was largely supported by substantial to strong Bayesian evidence. Therefore, our results challenge previously reported benefits of single-session anodal PPC-tDCS on VWM.
非侵入性脑刺激已被视为一种可能带来认知益处的干预手段,包括对视觉工作记忆(VWM)的影响。然而,研究结果并不一致,这可能是由于方法学问题所致。Wang等人最近的一项备受瞩目的研究报告称,对顶叶后皮质(PPC)而非背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)进行阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),能选择性地提高VWM容量而非精度,尤其是在高VWM负荷下。因此,在当前预先注册的概念性重复研究中,我们考虑了原始研究中的关键潜在方法学问题,并测试了足以证明先前报道效果所需的足够数量的参与者(与n = 20相比,n = 48)。参与者在完成360次连续定向再现任务的试验之前,接受了PPC、DLPFC和假刺激的平衡处理,任务刺激和设置略有变化。我们没有发现PPC刺激具有选择性效果的证据。相反,我们的结果表明,无论刺激区域和VWM负荷如何,tDCS均无效果,这在很大程度上得到了大量至强有力的贝叶斯证据的支持。因此,我们的结果对先前报道的单次阳极PPC - tDCS对VWM的益处提出了挑战。