Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1609-e1618. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01132.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of minimum lumen area (MLA) by coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and its impact on fractional flow reserve (FFRCT).
Fifty-seven patients (118 lesions, 72 vessels) who underwent cCTA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were enrolled. OCT and cCTA were co-registered and MLAs were measured with both modalities. FFROCT was calculated using OCT-updated models with cCTA-based lumen geometry replaced by OCT-derived geometry. Lesions were grouped by Agatston score (AS) and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) using the OCT catheter and guidewire size (1.0 mm) as a threshold. For all lesions, the average absolute difference between cCTA and OCT MLA was 0.621±0.571 mm2. Pearson correlation coefficients between cCTA and OCT MLAs in lesions with low-intermediate and high AS were 0.873 and 0.787, respectively (both p<0.0001). Irrespective of AS score, excellent correlations were observed for MLA (r=0.839, p<0.0001) and FFR comparisons (r=0.918, p<0.0001) in lesions with MLD ≥1.0 mm but not for lesions with MLD <1.0 mm.
The spatial resolution of cCTA or calcification does not practically limit the accuracy of lumen boundary identification by cCTA or FFRCT calculations for MLD ≥1.0 mm. The accuracy of cCTA MLA could not be adequately assessed for lesions with MLD <1.0 mm.
本研究旨在评估冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(cCTA)的最小管腔面积(MLA)的准确性及其对血流储备分数(FFRCT)的影响。
本研究共纳入 57 例(118 处病变,72 支血管)接受 cCTA 和光学相干断层成像(OCT)检查的患者。将 OCT 和 cCTA 进行配准,并使用两种方法测量 MLA。使用基于 OCT 更新模型的 FFRCT,将 cCTA 基于管腔几何的计算替换为基于 OCT 衍生几何的计算。使用 OCT 导管和导丝大小(1.0mm)作为阈值,根据病变的 Agatston 评分(AS)和最小管腔直径(MLD)将病变分组。对于所有病变,cCTA 和 OCT MLA 的平均绝对差值为 0.621±0.571mm2。低-中度和高 AS 病变的 cCTA 和 OCT MLA 之间的 Pearson 相关系数分别为 0.873 和 0.787(均<0.0001)。无论 AS 评分如何,在 MLD≥1.0mm 的病变中,MLA(r=0.839,p<0.0001)和 FFR 比较(r=0.918,p<0.0001)之间均存在极好的相关性,但在 MLD<1.0mm 的病变中则没有。
对于 MLD≥1.0mm 的病变,cCTA 的空间分辨率实际上不会限制管腔边界识别的准确性,也不会限制 cCTA 计算的 FFRCT。对于 MLD<1.0mm 的病变,无法充分评估 cCTA 的 MLA 准确性。