Suppr超能文献

从冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影中提取的管腔边界用于计算血流储备分数(FFRCT):与光学相干断层扫描的验证。

Lumen boundaries extracted from coronary computed tomography angiography on computed fractional flow reserve (FFRCT): validation with optical coherence tomography.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1609-e1618. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01132.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of minimum lumen area (MLA) by coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and its impact on fractional flow reserve (FFRCT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (118 lesions, 72 vessels) who underwent cCTA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were enrolled. OCT and cCTA were co-registered and MLAs were measured with both modalities. FFROCT was calculated using OCT-updated models with cCTA-based lumen geometry replaced by OCT-derived geometry. Lesions were grouped by Agatston score (AS) and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) using the OCT catheter and guidewire size (1.0 mm) as a threshold. For all lesions, the average absolute difference between cCTA and OCT MLA was 0.621±0.571 mm2. Pearson correlation coefficients between cCTA and OCT MLAs in lesions with low-intermediate and high AS were 0.873 and 0.787, respectively (both p<0.0001). Irrespective of AS score, excellent correlations were observed for MLA (r=0.839, p<0.0001) and FFR comparisons (r=0.918, p<0.0001) in lesions with MLD ≥1.0 mm but not for lesions with MLD <1.0 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The spatial resolution of cCTA or calcification does not practically limit the accuracy of lumen boundary identification by cCTA or FFRCT calculations for MLD ≥1.0 mm. The accuracy of cCTA MLA could not be adequately assessed for lesions with MLD <1.0 mm.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(cCTA)的最小管腔面积(MLA)的准确性及其对血流储备分数(FFRCT)的影响。

方法和结果

本研究共纳入 57 例(118 处病变,72 支血管)接受 cCTA 和光学相干断层成像(OCT)检查的患者。将 OCT 和 cCTA 进行配准,并使用两种方法测量 MLA。使用基于 OCT 更新模型的 FFRCT,将 cCTA 基于管腔几何的计算替换为基于 OCT 衍生几何的计算。使用 OCT 导管和导丝大小(1.0mm)作为阈值,根据病变的 Agatston 评分(AS)和最小管腔直径(MLD)将病变分组。对于所有病变,cCTA 和 OCT MLA 的平均绝对差值为 0.621±0.571mm2。低-中度和高 AS 病变的 cCTA 和 OCT MLA 之间的 Pearson 相关系数分别为 0.873 和 0.787(均<0.0001)。无论 AS 评分如何,在 MLD≥1.0mm 的病变中,MLA(r=0.839,p<0.0001)和 FFR 比较(r=0.918,p<0.0001)之间均存在极好的相关性,但在 MLD<1.0mm 的病变中则没有。

结论

对于 MLD≥1.0mm 的病变,cCTA 的空间分辨率实际上不会限制管腔边界识别的准确性,也不会限制 cCTA 计算的 FFRCT。对于 MLD<1.0mm 的病变,无法充分评估 cCTA 的 MLA 准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验