• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触发因素和否决障碍对非正规城市周边住区环卫实施的重要性——以玻利维亚科恰班巴为例。

Importance of triggers and veto-barriers for the implementation of sanitation in informal peri-urban settlements - The case of Cochabamba, Bolivia.

机构信息

Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Water Environment Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Centre for Water and Environmental Sanitation, University Mayor of San Simon, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0193613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193613. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0193613
PMID:29617459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5884479/
Abstract

An estimated 2.4 billion people lack access to improved sanitation which has devastating consequences for human health and the environment. Understanding what constitute sanitation demand is crucial for accelerating the spread of improved sanitation. This study aims to understand the adoption mechanisms for improved sanitation. An informal peri-urban settlement in Cochabamba, Bolivia was selected as a case study to understand adoption patterns. Various qualitative methods of data collection and analysis were employed. The findings showed that pour-flush toilets was the only preferred sanitation alternative at the study site. An adoption framework for waterborne toilets was developed based on diffusion of innovation theory. Factors that influence adoption were identified. Some functioned as triggers and initiated adoption, whereas some factors blocked adoption and constituted veto-barriers. Most factors were connected to the individual household situation and its members, but neighborhood development also affected pour-flush adoption. Based on adoption time the residents were divided into the following adoption groups: first adopters, early majority, late majority, laggards and non-adopters. Each adoption group followed its own adoption route with specific characteristics and respective triggers or veto-barriers. We argue that the strong demand for waterborne toilets in peri-urban areas need to be recognized and the developed framework could be used for customizing sanitation improvement programs for certain target groups.

摘要

据估计,有 24 亿人无法获得改良的卫生设施,这对人类健康和环境造成了毁灭性的影响。了解什么是卫生需求对于加速改良卫生设施的普及至关重要。本研究旨在了解改良卫生设施的采用机制。玻利维亚科恰班巴的一个非正规城郊定居点被选为案例研究,以了解采用模式。采用了各种定性的数据收集和分析方法。研究结果表明,在研究地点,冲水马桶是唯一受欢迎的卫生设施替代方案。根据创新扩散理论,开发了一种用于水冲厕所的采用框架。确定了影响采用的因素。一些因素作为触发因素引发了采用,而一些因素则阻碍了采用,并构成了否决障碍。大多数因素与单个家庭情况及其成员有关,但邻里发展也影响了冲水马桶的采用。根据采用时间,居民被分为以下采用群体:早期采用者、早期多数派、晚期多数派、落后者和不采用者。每个采用群体都有自己的采用途径,具有特定的特点和各自的触发因素或否决障碍。我们认为,需要认识到城市周边地区对水冲厕所的强烈需求,并可以使用所开发的框架为特定目标群体定制卫生改善计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bb/5884479/41e6807a6585/pone.0193613.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bb/5884479/f9b73cd65df6/pone.0193613.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bb/5884479/78e00441ffda/pone.0193613.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bb/5884479/41e6807a6585/pone.0193613.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bb/5884479/f9b73cd65df6/pone.0193613.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bb/5884479/78e00441ffda/pone.0193613.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bb/5884479/41e6807a6585/pone.0193613.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Importance of triggers and veto-barriers for the implementation of sanitation in informal peri-urban settlements - The case of Cochabamba, Bolivia.触发因素和否决障碍对非正规城市周边住区环卫实施的重要性——以玻利维亚科恰班巴为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0193613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193613. eCollection 2018.
2
Drivers of women's sanitation practices in informal settlements in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study in Mathare Valley, Kenya.撒哈拉以南非洲非正规住区女性卫生习惯的驱动因素:肯尼亚马萨雷谷的定性研究。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2018 Dec;28(6):609-625. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1497778. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
3
Opportunities and barriers to effective operation and maintenance of public toilets in informal settlements: perspectives from toilet operators in Kampala.非正规住区公共厕所有效运营和维护的机遇和障碍:来自坎帕拉厕所运营者的观点。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(4):359-370. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1544610. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
4
A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚农村地区卫生设施采用、可持续性及持续使用障碍的社会生态分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6.
5
Comparing Sanitation Delivery Modalities in Urban Informal Settlement Schools: A Randomized Trial in Nairobi, Kenya.比较城市非正规住区学校的卫生设施提供模式:肯尼亚内罗毕的一项随机试验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Nov 30;13(12):1189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121189.
6
The improved and the unimproved: Factors influencing sanitation and diarrhoea in a peri-urban settlement of Lusaka, Zambia.改良和未改良:影响赞比亚卢萨卡城郊住区环境卫生和腹泻的因素。
PLoS One. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0232763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232763. eCollection 2020.
7
Why gender matters in the solution towards safe sanitation? Reflections from rural India.为何性别因素在安全卫生设施解决方案中至关重要?来自印度农村地区的思考。
Glob Public Health. 2016 Dec;11(10):1185-1201. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1062905. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
The toilet tripod: understanding successful sanitation in rural India.厕所三脚架:理解印度农村地区的成功卫生设施建设。
Health Place. 2014 Sep;29:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
9
Barriers to access improved water and sanitation in poor peri-urban settlements of Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.科特迪瓦阿比让贫困城郊住区改善供水和环境卫生的障碍。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0202928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202928. eCollection 2018.
10
Understanding the Barriers and Opportunities for Effective Management of Shared Sanitation in Low-Income Settlements-The Case of Kumasi, Ghana.了解低收入住区共享卫生设施有效管理的障碍和机遇——以加纳库马西为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124528.

引用本文的文献

1
How community participation in water and sanitation interventions impacts human health, WASH infrastructure and service longevity in low-income and middle-income countries: a realist review.社区参与水和环境卫生干预措施如何影响低收入和中等收入国家的人类健康、水环卫基础设施和服务的可持续性:一个现实主义的综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e053320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053320.
2
Patterns and Drivers of Household Sanitation Access and Sustainability in Kwale County, Kenya.肯尼亚夸莱县家庭卫生设施获取和可持续性的模式和驱动因素。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 4;55(9):6052-6064. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05647. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals.2000 - 2015年全球、区域和国家五岁以下儿童死亡原因:一项最新的系统分析及其对可持续发展目标的启示
Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):3027-3035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Adopt or Adapt: Sanitation Technology Choices in Urbanizing Malawi.采用还是适应:城市化进程中的马拉维卫生技术选择
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161262. eCollection 2016.
3
A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Accessing Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Disabled People in Malawi.
Assessing the Impact and Equity of an Integrated Rural Sanitation Approach: A Longitudinal Evaluation in 11 Sub-Saharan Africa and Asian Countries.
评估综合农村卫生方法的影响和公平性:在撒哈拉以南非洲和亚洲的 11 个国家进行的纵向评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):1808. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051808.
马拉维残疾人获取水、环境卫生和个人卫生服务的障碍的定性研究
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155043. eCollection 2016.
4
Ending open defecation in rural Tanzania: which factors facilitate latrine adoption?在坦桑尼亚农村地区终结露天排便:哪些因素有助于促进厕所的采用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Sep 22;11(9):9854-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110909854.
5
Evaluation of household latrine coverage in Kewot woreda, Ethiopia, 3 years after implementing interventions to control blinding trachoma.评价埃塞俄比亚凯沃托县在实施控制致盲性沙眼干预措施 3 年后的家庭厕所普及率。
Int Health. 2011 Dec;3(4):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2011.06.007.
6
Sanitation and health.卫生与健康。
PLoS Med. 2010 Nov 16;7(11):e1000363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000363.
7
Modelling latrine diffusion in Benin: towards a community typology of demand for improved sanitation in developing countries.贝宁旱厕分布建模:为发展中国家改善环境卫生需求的社区类型学。
J Water Health. 2010 Mar;8(1):166-83. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.111.
8
Characteristics of latrine promotion participants and non-participants; inspection of latrines; and perceptions of household latrines in Northern Ghana.加纳北部地区厕所推广参与者与非参与者的特征;厕所检查;以及对家庭厕所的看法。
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Jun;12(6):772-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01848.x.
9
Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana.加纳家庭决策、卫生设施需求的行为指标以及社会营销的潜在收益
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jun;64(12):2427-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
10
Follow-up of a low cost latrine promotion programme in one district of Amhara, Ethiopia: characteristics of early adopters and non-adopters.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉州一个地区低成本厕所推广项目的随访:早期采用者和未采用者的特征
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Sep;11(9):1406-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01689.x.