Rodgers Ann F, Ajono Lydia A, Gyapong John O, Hagan Maria, Emerson Paul M
Yale University, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Jun;12(6):772-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01848.x.
To examine characteristics of household heads in two districts of Northern Ghana who had or had not participated in latrine promotion programmes; to inspect latrines; and to explore perceptions of latrine ownership.
One hundred and twenty latrine owners and 120 non-owners were randomly selected from all trachoma-endemic villages and interviewed. Structured questionnaires assessed demographics, household data, wealth indicators, and perceptions of latrine ownership. Latrines were inspected.
Latrine owners and non-owners were similar demographically, but owners were more likely to report any education or wealth indicators: any education OR = 2.0, (95% CI 1.2-3.4); large family size OR = 4.6 (2.6-8.2); children in school OR = 3.8 (1.3-10.5); and metal roof OR = 9.1 (2.0-40.0). All 120 latrine owners were participating in promotion programmes; no latrines had been self-built without programme support. Inspection showed 73/120 (60.1%) latrines were completed and used. Of the uncompleted latrines 41/47 (87.2%) were more than a year old. Programme participants (regardless of whether they had a completed latrine) had contributed cash (mean 16.74 dollars S.D.18.09) and 117/120 had provided labour and/or construction materials. The most frequently reported advantages of latrine ownership were convenience, cleanliness and health benefits; reported disadvantages were the need for maintenance and cleaning and bad odour.
Current latrine promotion programmes do not reach all households equally. Joining a latrine programme was expensive and did not guarantee latrine ownership; this may cause people to lose trust in such programmes. Latrines were perceived to be useful, suggesting unmet demand. Reliable and inclusive programmes that provide low cost latrines may receive community support.
研究加纳北部两个地区参与或未参与厕所推广项目的户主特征;检查厕所;并探讨对厕所所有权的看法。
从所有沙眼流行村庄中随机抽取120名厕所所有者和120名非所有者进行访谈。结构化问卷评估人口统计学、家庭数据、财富指标以及对厕所所有权的看法。对厕所进行检查。
厕所所有者和非所有者在人口统计学上相似,但所有者更有可能报告接受过任何教育或拥有财富指标:接受过任何教育,比值比(OR)=2.0,(95%置信区间1.2 - 3.4);家庭规模大,OR = 4.6(2.6 - 8.2);有孩子上学,OR = 3.8(1.3 - 10.5);有金属屋顶,OR = 9.1(2.0 - 40.0)。所有120名厕所所有者都参与了推广项目;没有厕所是在没有项目支持的情况下自建的。检查显示120个厕所中有73个(60.1%)已建成并投入使用。在未建成的厕所中,41/4(87.2%)已超过一年。项目参与者(无论其厕所是否已建成)都贡献了现金(平均16.74美元,标准差18.09美元),120人中有117人提供了劳动力和/或建筑材料。报告的拥有厕所最常见的优点是方便、清洁和对健康有益;报告的缺点是需要维护和清洁以及有异味。
当前的厕所推广项目并未平等地覆盖所有家庭。参与厕所项目成本高昂且不能保证拥有厕所;这可能导致人们对此类项目失去信任。人们认为厕所有用,表明存在未满足的需求。提供低成本厕所的可靠且包容性强的项目可能会得到社区支持。