Kwon Hyuck Min, Yang Ick-Hwan, Lee Woo-Suk, Yu Alvin Ray L, Oh Sang Yun, Park Kwan Kyu
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
J Knee Surg. 2019 Mar;32(3):233-238. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641140. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Accurate measurement of knee range of motion (ROM) is critical to predict the outcomes of knee surgery and prognosis. We investigated the reliability of knee ROM measurements by goniometer compared with robotic system. Fifty-three patients with medial osteoarthritis who were planning to undergo unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with robotic UKA were prospectively enrolled. During the operation, knee ROM measurement was performed in both flexion and extension before and after insertion of the implant using both a goniometer and robotic system. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of extension measured by the goniometer and robotic system showed good agreement; however, the ICC of flexion did not show good agreement. During passive flexion, the mean values measured before insertion of the implant were significantly lower by goniometer (134.6 ± 6.43) than by robot (145.4 ± 6.80; = 0.017); likewise, the mean values after insertion of the implant were significantly lower by goniometer (138.6 ± 6.07) than by robotic system (147.0 ± 6.60; = 0.045). A goniometer can underestimate knee ROM measurements compared with robotic system, especially in flexion. Orthopaedic surgeons should be cautious when measuring the flexion angle with a goniometer.
准确测量膝关节活动范围(ROM)对于预测膝关节手术结果和预后至关重要。我们研究了与机器人系统相比,使用角度计测量膝关节ROM的可靠性。前瞻性纳入了53例计划接受机器人单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)的内侧骨关节炎患者。手术过程中,在植入物植入前后,使用角度计和机器人系统分别在膝关节屈伸时进行ROM测量。角度计和机器人系统测量的伸展的组内相关系数(ICC)显示出良好的一致性;然而,屈曲的ICC并未显示出良好的一致性。在被动屈曲过程中,植入物植入前角度计测量的平均值(134.6±6.43)显著低于机器人测量值(145.4±6.80;P = 0.017);同样,植入物植入后角度计测量的平均值(138.6±6.07)也显著低于机器人系统测量值(147.0±6.60;P = 0.045)。与机器人系统相比,角度计可能会低估膝关节ROM测量值,尤其是在屈曲时。骨科医生在使用角度计测量屈曲角度时应谨慎。