Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, London, UK; Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK.
University College London Hospitals; The Princess Grace Hospital; The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, London, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101-B(1):24-33. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0564.R2.
The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, inpatient functional rehabilitation, time to hospital discharge, and complications in patients undergoing conventional jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus robotic-arm assisted UKA.
This prospective cohort study included 146 patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary UKA performed by a single surgeon. This included 73 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based mobile bearing UKA, followed by 73 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted fixed bearing UKA. All surgical procedures were performed using the standard medial parapatellar approach for UKA, and all patients underwent the same postoperative rehabilitation programme. Postoperative pain scores on the numerical rating scale and opiate analgesia consumption were recorded until discharge. Time to attainment of predefined functional rehabilitation outcomes, hospital discharge, and postoperative complications were recorded by independent observers.
Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased opiate analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001), and increased maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based UKA. Mean time to hospital discharge was reduced in robotic UKA compared with conventional UKA (42.5 hours (sd 5.9) vs 71.1 hours (sd 14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups within 90 days' follow-up.
Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced opiate analgesia requirements, improved early functional rehabilitation, and shorter time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based UKA.
本研究旨在比较传统基于夹具的单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)与机器人辅助 UKA 术后疼痛、镇痛需求、住院功能康复、出院时间和并发症。
本前瞻性队列研究纳入了 146 例接受单髁膝关节置换术治疗的有症状内侧间室膝关节骨关节炎患者,由同一位外科医生进行手术。其中 73 例连续患者接受传统基于夹具的活动衬垫 UKA,随后 73 例连续患者接受机器人辅助固定衬垫 UKA。所有手术均采用 UKA 标准内侧髌旁入路进行,所有患者均接受相同的术后康复方案。记录术后数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分和阿片类镇痛药用量,直至出院。记录达到预定功能康复终点、出院时间和术后并发症的时间,由独立观察者记录。
与传统基于夹具的 UKA 相比,机器人辅助 UKA 术后疼痛减轻(p < 0.001),阿片类镇痛药用量减少(p < 0.001),直腿抬高时间缩短(p < 0.001),理疗次数减少(p < 0.001),出院时最大膝关节屈曲度增加(p < 0.001)。与传统 UKA 相比,机器人 UKA 的平均出院时间缩短(分别为 42.5 小时(标准差 5.9)和 71.1 小时(标准差 14.6);p < 0.001)。在 90 天随访期间,两组术后并发症无差异。
与传统基于夹具的 UKA 相比,机器人辅助 UKA 术后疼痛减轻、阿片类镇痛药用量减少、早期功能康复改善、出院时间缩短。