Suppr超能文献

有害还是有益?关于自杀丧亲者如何体验研究参与的系统评价

Harmful or Helpful? A Systematic Review of How Those Bereaved Through Suicide Experience Research Participation.

作者信息

Andriessen Karl, Krysinska Karolina, Draper Brian, Dudley Michael, Mitchell Philip B

机构信息

1 School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Crisis. 2018 Sep;39(5):364-376. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000515. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many of the bereaved through suicide are interested in participating in postvention studies. However, there is a contradiction between the positive experiences of research participation and concerns raised by ethical boards.

AIMS

To review studies on the experience of research participation by those bereaved through suicide, including initial contact with the study and its short- and long-term impacts.

METHOD

Systematic searches in Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, as well as Google Scholar identified 12 papers reporting on 11 studies.

RESULTS

The majority (73-100%) of study participants evaluated participation positively, and would recommend it to others (90-100%), as it was related to altruism, social support, and personal growth. A minority experienced participation as negative (2-10%) or upsetting (5-22%) due to feelings of guilt or painful memories. However, having a painful experience does not preclude seeing it as helpful.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies concerned face-to-face psychological autopsy studies, and only two studies included a control group.

CONCLUSION

Research applying standardized measures may enhance our understanding of the factors germane to (non-)participation and to the likelihood of a positive/negative research experience. Vigilant recruitment and providing optimum care for participants are indicated. Further research may continue to improve participant safety and the research design of suicide bereavement studies.

摘要

背景

许多自杀身亡者的遗属有兴趣参与事后干预研究。然而,研究参与的积极体验与伦理委员会提出的担忧之间存在矛盾。

目的

回顾关于自杀身亡者遗属参与研究的体验的研究,包括与研究的初次接触及其短期和长期影响。

方法

在Embase、Medline、PsycINFO以及谷歌学术中进行系统检索,确定了12篇报道11项研究的论文。

结果

大多数(73%-100%)研究参与者对参与给予积极评价,并会向他人推荐(90%-100%),因为这与利他主义、社会支持和个人成长有关。少数人因内疚感或痛苦回忆而将参与视为负面(2%-10%)或令人苦恼(5%-22%)。然而,有痛苦经历并不妨碍将其视为有帮助的。

局限性

大多数研究涉及面对面的心理解剖研究,只有两项研究包括对照组。

结论

采用标准化措施的研究可能会增进我们对与(不)参与以及积极/消极研究体验可能性相关因素的理解。需要谨慎招募并为参与者提供最佳护理。进一步的研究可能会继续提高参与者的安全性以及自杀丧亲研究的设计。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验