• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有害还是有益?关于自杀丧亲者如何体验研究参与的系统评价

Harmful or Helpful? A Systematic Review of How Those Bereaved Through Suicide Experience Research Participation.

作者信息

Andriessen Karl, Krysinska Karolina, Draper Brian, Dudley Michael, Mitchell Philip B

机构信息

1 School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Crisis. 2018 Sep;39(5):364-376. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000515. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000515
PMID:29618271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many of the bereaved through suicide are interested in participating in postvention studies. However, there is a contradiction between the positive experiences of research participation and concerns raised by ethical boards.

AIMS

To review studies on the experience of research participation by those bereaved through suicide, including initial contact with the study and its short- and long-term impacts.

METHOD

Systematic searches in Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, as well as Google Scholar identified 12 papers reporting on 11 studies.

RESULTS

The majority (73-100%) of study participants evaluated participation positively, and would recommend it to others (90-100%), as it was related to altruism, social support, and personal growth. A minority experienced participation as negative (2-10%) or upsetting (5-22%) due to feelings of guilt or painful memories. However, having a painful experience does not preclude seeing it as helpful.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies concerned face-to-face psychological autopsy studies, and only two studies included a control group.

CONCLUSION

Research applying standardized measures may enhance our understanding of the factors germane to (non-)participation and to the likelihood of a positive/negative research experience. Vigilant recruitment and providing optimum care for participants are indicated. Further research may continue to improve participant safety and the research design of suicide bereavement studies.

摘要

背景

许多自杀身亡者的遗属有兴趣参与事后干预研究。然而,研究参与的积极体验与伦理委员会提出的担忧之间存在矛盾。

目的

回顾关于自杀身亡者遗属参与研究的体验的研究,包括与研究的初次接触及其短期和长期影响。

方法

在Embase、Medline、PsycINFO以及谷歌学术中进行系统检索,确定了12篇报道11项研究的论文。

结果

大多数(73%-100%)研究参与者对参与给予积极评价,并会向他人推荐(90%-100%),因为这与利他主义、社会支持和个人成长有关。少数人因内疚感或痛苦回忆而将参与视为负面(2%-10%)或令人苦恼(5%-22%)。然而,有痛苦经历并不妨碍将其视为有帮助的。

局限性

大多数研究涉及面对面的心理解剖研究,只有两项研究包括对照组。

结论

采用标准化措施的研究可能会增进我们对与(不)参与以及积极/消极研究体验可能性相关因素的理解。需要谨慎招募并为参与者提供最佳护理。进一步的研究可能会继续提高参与者的安全性以及自杀丧亲研究的设计。

相似文献

1
Harmful or Helpful? A Systematic Review of How Those Bereaved Through Suicide Experience Research Participation.有害还是有益?关于自杀丧亲者如何体验研究参与的系统评价
Crisis. 2018 Sep;39(5):364-376. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000515. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
2
Research participation experiences of informants of suicide and control cases: taken from a case-control psychological autopsy study of people who died by suicide.自杀者知情者和对照者的研究参与体验:来自自杀死亡者病例对照心理解剖研究。
Crisis. 2010;31(5):238-46. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000025.
3
Meaning-making through psychological autopsy interviews: the value of participating in qualitative research for those bereaved by suicide.通过心理解剖访谈进行意义建构:参与自杀丧亲者定性研究的价值。
Death Stud. 2011 Sep;35(8):685-710. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2011.553310.
4
Bereaved parents' experience of research participation.丧亲父母参与研究的经历。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(2):391-400. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00205-3.
5
Challenges and opportunities for suicide bereavement research: the experience of ethical board review.自杀丧亲研究的挑战与机遇:伦理审查委员会的经验。
Crisis. 2013 Jan 1;34(5):297-304. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000191.
6
The ethics of doing nothing. Suicide-bereavement and research: ethical and methodological considerations.无为的伦理。自杀丧亲之痛与研究:伦理及方法学考量
Psychol Med. 2014 Dec;44(16):3409-20. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001670. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
7
The Reactions of Adolescents, Parents and Clinicians to Participating in Qualitative Research Interviews Regarding Adolescents Bereaved by Suicide and Other Traumatic Death.青少年、家长和临床医生参与关于青少年因自杀和其他创伤性死亡而丧亲的定性研究访谈的反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010452.
8
Impacts of suicide bereavement on men: a systematic review.自杀丧亲之痛对男性的影响:一项系统综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 9;12:1372974. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1372974. eCollection 2024.
9
Current Postvention Research and Priorities for the Future.当前的创伤后应激障碍预防研究和未来的优先事项。
Crisis. 2017 May;38(3):202-206. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000459. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Effectiveness of interventions for people bereaved through suicide: a systematic review of controlled studies of grief, psychosocial and suicide-related outcomes.干预措施对自杀致丧亲者的效果:对悲伤、心理社会和自杀相关结局的对照研究的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2020-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of social media after bereavement by suicide: results from a French online survey.自杀丧亲后社交媒体的使用:一项法国在线调查的结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05761-9.
2
Are we Using the Right Evidence to Inform Suicide Prevention in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? An Umbrella Review.我们是否在利用正确的证据来指导低收入和中等收入国家的自杀预防工作?一项综述。
Arch Suicide Res. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1):290-308. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2322144. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
3
The Needs, Use and Expectations of People Bereaved by Suicide Regarding Online Resources: An Online Survey.
自杀死亡者亲友对在线资源的需求、使用情况和期望:一项在线调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;19(19):12156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912156.
4
Ethical Issues in Bereavement Research with Minors: A Scoping Review.针对未成年人的丧亲之痛研究中的伦理问题:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;9(9):1400. doi: 10.3390/children9091400.
5
The Reactions of Adolescents, Parents and Clinicians to Participating in Qualitative Research Interviews Regarding Adolescents Bereaved by Suicide and Other Traumatic Death.青少年、家长和临床医生参与关于青少年因自杀和其他创伤性死亡而丧亲的定性研究访谈的反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010452.
6
Development of an Online Resource for People Bereaved by Suicide: A Mixed-Method User-Centered Study Protocol.为自杀丧亲者开发在线资源:一项以用户为中心的混合方法研究方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 21;12:770154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770154. eCollection 2021.
7
A Qualitative Analysis of Motivators to Participation in Suicide-Focused Research from a Community-Based Australian Sample.基于澳大利亚社区样本的自杀研究参与动机的定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;18(9):4705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094705.
8
Acceptability, Safety, and Resonance of the Pilot Digital Suicide Prevention Campaign "Better Off With You": Qualitative Study.试点数字自杀预防活动“有你会更好”的可接受性、安全性和共鸣性:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Mar 3;5(3):e23892. doi: 10.2196/23892.
9
The Experience of Adults Bereaved by the Suicide of a Close Elderly Relative: A Qualitative Pilot Study.成年亲属因亲密老年亲属自杀而痛失亲人的经历:一项定性的试点研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 14;11:2331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538678. eCollection 2020.
10
Carers' Motivations for, and Experiences of, Participating in Suicide Research.照顾者参与自杀研究的动机和体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;17(5):1733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051733.