• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预措施对自杀致丧亲者的效果:对悲伤、心理社会和自杀相关结局的对照研究的系统评价。

Effectiveness of interventions for people bereaved through suicide: a systematic review of controlled studies of grief, psychosocial and suicide-related outcomes.

机构信息

Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.

School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Hospital Rd, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2020-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-019-2020-z
PMID:30700267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6354344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suicide bereavement is a risk factor for adverse outcomes related to grief, social functioning, mental health and suicidal behaviour. Consequently, suicide bereavement support (i.e., postvention) has been identified as an important suicide prevention strategy. However, little is known about its effectiveness. To redress this gap, this review aimed to assess the evidence of effectiveness of interventions for people bereaved by suicide, and appraise the quality of the research in this field.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches of peer-reviewed literature in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and EBM Reviews identified 12 papers reporting on 11 relevant studies conducted between 1984 and 2018.

RESULTS

Across studies, there was a wide variety of intervention modalities, study populations, control groups, and grief, psychosocial and suicide-related outcome measures. Overall, the quality of studies was weak. While there was some evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for uncomplicated grief, evidence of the effectiveness of complicated grief interventions was lacking. Based on this scant evidence, interventions which seem to show promise include supportive, therapeutic and educational approaches, involve the social environment of the bereaved, and comprise a series of sessions led by trained facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear need for additional methodologically sound studies in this area. Specifically, selection procedures, sample sizes, randomization, and the use of appropriate measures are crucial. As people bereaved by suicide are at-risk of adverse grief, mental ill-health and suicidal behaviour, further research across the life-span is essential to prevent grief and mental health ramifications.

摘要

背景

自杀丧亲是与悲伤、社会功能、心理健康和自杀行为相关的不良后果的一个风险因素。因此,自杀丧亲支持(即预防自杀后干预)已被确定为一项重要的自杀预防策略。然而,对于其有效性知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,本综述旨在评估针对自杀丧亲者的干预措施的有效性证据,并评估该领域研究的质量。

方法

我们根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述。在 Medline、PsycINFO、Embase 和 EBM Reviews 中对同行评审文献进行了检索,确定了 12 篇报告了 1984 年至 2018 年期间进行的 11 项相关研究的论文。

结果

在研究中,干预措施的模式、研究人群、对照组以及悲伤、心理社会和自杀相关的结果测量方法多种多样。总体而言,研究质量较弱。尽管有一些干预对单纯悲伤有效的证据,但缺乏对复杂悲伤干预有效的证据。基于这少量证据,似乎有希望的干预措施包括支持性、治疗性和教育性方法,涉及丧亲者的社会环境,并由经过培训的 facilitators 主导一系列的会议。

结论

在这一领域需要进行更多方法学上健全的研究。具体来说,选择程序、样本量、随机化和适当措施的使用至关重要。由于自杀丧亲者面临不良悲伤、心理健康问题和自杀行为的风险,因此需要在整个生命周期进行进一步的研究,以预防悲伤和心理健康的后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2d/6354344/45a72e572cf5/12888_2019_2020_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2d/6354344/45a72e572cf5/12888_2019_2020_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2d/6354344/45a72e572cf5/12888_2019_2020_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of interventions for people bereaved through suicide: a systematic review of controlled studies of grief, psychosocial and suicide-related outcomes.干预措施对自杀致丧亲者的效果:对悲伤、心理社会和自杀相关结局的对照研究的系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2020-z.
2
Suicide Postvention Service Models and Guidelines 2014-2019: A Systematic Review.2014 - 2019年自杀后干预服务模式与指南:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 29;10:2677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02677. eCollection 2019.
3
Continuing Bonds after Loss by Suicide: A Systematic Review.自杀后持续的联系:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;19(5):2963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052963.
4
Impacts of suicide bereavement on men: a systematic review.自杀丧亲之痛对男性的影响:一项系统综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 9;12:1372974. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1372974. eCollection 2024.
5
Scoping Review of Peer-Led Support for People Bereaved by Suicide.自杀死亡者亲友同辈支持:范围综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;19(6):3485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063485.
6
Grief interventions for people bereaved by suicide: A systematic review.针对因自杀而失去亲人者的悲伤干预措施:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179496. eCollection 2017.
7
Reach and perceived effectiveness of a community-led active outreach postvention intervention for people bereaved by suicide.社区主导的主动外展后干预对自杀丧亲者的触及和感知效果。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;10:1040323. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1040323. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychosocial Outcomes of Individuals Attending a Suicide Bereavement Peer Support Group: A Follow-Up Study.参加自杀丧亲同伴支持小组的个体的心理社会结局:一项随访研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):4076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074076.
9
Course of bereavement over 8-10 years in first degree relatives and spouses of people who committed suicide: longitudinal community based cohort study.8-10 年内丧亲之痛的过程:在自杀者的一级亲属和配偶中:纵向社区为基础的队列研究。
BMJ. 2013 Oct 2;347:f5519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5519.
10
An integrative systematic review of online resources and interventions for people bereaved by suicide.自杀死亡者亲友的在线资源和干预措施的综合系统评价
Prev Med. 2021 Nov;152(Pt 1):106583. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106583. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial of an SMS-Based Brief Contact Intervention for People Bereaved by Suicide.一项针对自杀丧亲者的基于短信的简短接触干预随机对照试验。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Oct;55(5):e70043. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70043.
2
Predictors of Prolonged Grief in Suicide Loss Survivors: The Role of Social Invalidation, Meaning in Life and Time Since Loss.自杀身亡者遗属中持续性悲伤的预测因素:社会无效化、生活意义及丧亲时间的作用
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70137. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70137.
3
A suicide bereavement model: based on a meta-ethnography of the experiences of adult suicide loss survivors.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptoms of persistent complex bereavement disorder, depression, and PTSD in a conjugally bereaved sample: a network analysis.丧偶后持续性复杂哀伤障碍、抑郁和 PTSD 症状在丧偶样本中的表现:网络分析。
Psychol Med. 2018 Oct;48(14):2439-2448. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001769. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
2
Prolonged grief disorder: clinical utility of ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines.持续性悲伤障碍:ICD-11 诊断指南的临床实用性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):861-867. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001563. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Treatment of Complicated Grief in Survivors of Suicide Loss: A HEAL Report.
一种自杀丧亲模型:基于对成年自杀身亡者幸存者经历的元民族志研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 14;13:1596961. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1596961. eCollection 2025.
4
Grief, bereavement and prolonged grief disorder: scoping and mapping the evidence.悲伤、丧亲之痛与持续性悲伤障碍:证据的范围界定与梳理
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jul 11;11(4):e149. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10050.
5
Territories of mourning: Addressing submerged problems of grief through multidisciplinary care.哀悼的领域:通过多学科护理解决被掩盖的悲伤问题。
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jun 6;13(16):98271. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i16.98271.
6
The Efficacy of Bereavement Interventions: A Systematic Umbrella Review.丧亲之痛干预措施的疗效:一项系统性综合综述。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2025;33(3):127-148. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000426. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
7
Measuring What Outcomes Matters Most to People When Accessing Suicide Postvention Support: A Qualitative Study.衡量人们在获得自杀后干预支持时最重要的结果:一项定性研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Aug;61(6):1115-1125. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01452-1. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
8
Implementation of suicide bereavement support: a scoping review.实施自杀丧亲者支持:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 14;12:1474641. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1474641. eCollection 2024.
9
Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide.支持自杀丧亲者的干预措施各组成部分的感知有效性
Crisis. 2025 Mar;46(2):106-120. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000978. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
10
State of the Science: Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Prolonged Grief Disorder.科学现状:创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗干预。
Behav Ther. 2024 Nov;55(6):1303-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
自杀死亡幸存者创伤后复杂哀伤的治疗:HEAL 报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Mar/Apr;79(2). doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11592.
4
Support Needs and Experiences of People Bereaved by Suicide: Qualitative Findings from a Cross-Sectional British Study of Bereaved Young Adults.自杀死亡者亲友的支持需求和体验:一项英国青年丧亲者的横断面定性研究结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 3;15(4):666. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040666.
5
What are the physical and psychological health effects of suicide bereavement on family members? An observational and interview mixed-methods study in Ireland.自杀丧亲之痛对家庭成员的身心健康有何影响?爱尔兰的一项观察与访谈相结合的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 13;8(1):e019472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019472.
6
A Systematic Mapping of Suicide Bereavement and Postvention Research and a Proposed Strategic Research Agenda.自杀丧亲与预防后研究的系统综述及拟议的战略研究议程。
Crisis. 2018 Jul;39(4):275-282. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000498. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
The role of avoidance in complicated grief: A detailed examination of the Grief-Related Avoidance Questionnaire (GRAQ) in a large sample of individuals with complicated grief.回避在复杂性悲伤中的作用:对大量复杂性悲伤个体样本中的悲伤相关回避问卷(GRAQ)的详细考察。
J Loss Trauma. 2016;21(6):533-547. doi: 10.1080/15325024.2016.1157412. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Grief interventions for people bereaved by suicide: A systematic review.针对因自杀而失去亲人者的悲伤干预措施:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 23;12(6):e0179496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179496. eCollection 2017.
9
Support received after bereavement by suicide and other sudden deaths: a cross-sectional UK study of 3432 young bereaved adults.自杀及其他突然死亡后的丧亲支持:一项针对3432名年轻丧亲成年人的英国横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e014487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014487.
10
Current Postvention Research and Priorities for the Future.当前的创伤后应激障碍预防研究和未来的优先事项。
Crisis. 2017 May;38(3):202-206. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000459. Epub 2017 May 3.