• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与患者体验改善相关的医院层面的护理协调策略。

Hospital-level care coordination strategies associated with better patient experience.

机构信息

Health Policy and Management, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):844-851. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007597. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007597
PMID:29618639
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient experience is a key measure of hospital quality and is increasingly contained in value-based payment programmes. Understanding whether strategies aimed at improving care transitions are associated with better patient experience could help clinical leaders and policymakers seeking to improve care across multiple dimensions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of specific hospital care coordination and transition strategies with patient experience.

DESIGN

We surveyed leadership at 1600 acute care hospitals and categorised respondents into three groups based on the strategies used: low-strategy (bottom quartile of number of strategies), mid-strategy (quartiles 2 and 3) and high-strategy (highest quartile). We used linear regression models to examine the association between use of these strategies and performance on measures of patient experience from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey.

RESULTS

We achieved a 62% response rate. High-strategy hospitals reported using 7.7 strategies on average usually or always on their patient populations, while mid-strategy and low-strategy hospitals reported using 5.0 and 2.3 strategies, respectively. Compared with low-strategy hospitals, high-strategy hospitals had a higher overall rating (+2.23 percentage points (pp), P<0.001), higher recommendation score (+2.5 pp, P<0.001), and higher satisfaction with discharge process (+1.35 pp, P=0.01) and medication communication (+1.44 pp, P=0.002). Mid-strategy hospitals had higher scores than low-strategy hospitals except for discharge satisfaction. Patient-facing strategies, like sharing discharge summaries with patients prior to discharge, using discharge coordinators and calling patients 48 hours after discharge, were each individually associated with a higher overall hospital rating, and higher satisfaction with discharge process and medication communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals with greater reported use of care coordination and transition strategies have better patient experience than hospitals with fewer reported strategies. Strategies that most directly involve patients have the strongest association with better experience.

摘要

背景

患者体验是医院质量的关键衡量标准,并且越来越多地包含在基于价值的支付计划中。了解旨在改善护理过渡的策略是否与更好的患者体验相关,可能有助于寻求改善多个维度护理的临床领导者和政策制定者。

目的

确定特定的医院护理协调和过渡策略与患者体验之间的关联。

设计

我们调查了 1600 家急症护理医院的领导层,并根据使用的策略将受访者分为三组:低策略组(使用策略数量处于最低四分位)、中策略组(第二和第三四分位)和高策略组(最高四分位)。我们使用线性回归模型来检查这些策略的使用与医院医疗保健提供者和系统评估调查的患者体验措施之间的关联。

结果

我们的回应率达到了 62%。高策略医院报告称,其患者群体平均通常或总是使用 7.7 种策略,而中策略和低策略医院分别报告使用 5.0 和 2.3 种策略。与低策略医院相比,高策略医院的整体评分更高(+2.23 个百分点(pp),P<0.001),推荐评分更高(+2.5 pp,P<0.001),出院流程满意度更高(+1.35 pp,P=0.01)和药物沟通满意度更高(+1.44 pp,P=0.002)。中策略医院的评分高于低策略医院,但出院满意度除外。面向患者的策略,如在出院前与患者共享出院总结、使用出院协调员以及在出院后 48 小时内致电患者,每项策略都与医院整体评分的提高和对出院流程以及药物沟通的满意度提高相关。

结论

报告使用更多护理协调和过渡策略的医院比报告使用较少策略的医院有更好的患者体验。与患者最直接相关的策略与更好的体验关联最强。

相似文献

1
Hospital-level care coordination strategies associated with better patient experience.与患者体验改善相关的医院层面的护理协调策略。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):844-851. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007597. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Exploring relationships between patient safety culture and patients' assessments of hospital care.探索患者安全文化与患者对医院护理评估之间的关系。
J Nurs Adm. 2014 Oct;44(10 Suppl):S45-53. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000118.
3
Is higher patient satisfaction associated with better stroke outcomes?患者满意度更高是否与更好的卒中结局相关?
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Oct 1;23(10):e316-e322.
4
Relationship Between Hospital Performance on a Patient Satisfaction Survey and Surgical Quality.患者满意度调查中医院绩效与手术质量的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Sep;150(9):858-64. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1108.
5
Are Facebook user ratings associated with hospital cost, quality and patient satisfaction? A cross-sectional analysis of hospitals in New York State.Facebook 用户评分与医院成本、质量和患者满意度相关吗?纽约州医院的横断面分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Feb;27(2):119-129. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006291. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals.美国医院患者的满意度与外科护理质量
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000765.
7
Inpatient Rehabilitation Quality of Care From the Patient's Perspective: Effect of Data Collection Timing and Patient Characteristics.从患者角度看住院康复护理质量:数据收集时间和患者特征的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1032-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States.美国患者对医院护理的看法。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1921-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0804116.
10
Can We Improve Workflows in the OR? A Comparison of Quality Perceptions and Preoperative Efficiency across Institutions in Spine Surgery.我们能否改善手术室的工作流程?脊柱手术中各机构质量认知与术前效率的比较。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Mar;73(1):46-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the drivers of patient satisfaction in the United States hospitals: Assessing quality indicators across regions.揭示美国医院患者满意度的驱动因素:评估各地区的质量指标。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0324737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324737. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing Equitable Implementation of a Social Care Initiative Integrating Medical and Social Services for Medicaid Members.评估一项为医疗补助计划参保人整合医疗和社会服务的社会护理倡议的公平实施情况。
Health Serv Res. 2025 May;60 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e14603. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14603. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Changes in Patient Care Experience After Private Equity Acquisition of US Hospitals.
美国医院被私募股权收购后患者护理体验的变化。
JAMA. 2025 Feb 11;333(6):490-497. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.23450.
4
Sustainability of California's Whole Person Care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees via newly developed Medicaid benefits.加利福尼亚州通过新开发的医疗补助福利为医疗补助参保人整合医疗和社会服务的全人护理试点项目的可持续性。
Health Serv Res. 2025 May;60 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e14418. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14418. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
5
Factors influencing patient experience in hospital wards: a systematic review.影响医院病房患者体验的因素:一项系统综述。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 1;23(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02054-0.
6
Use of Patient-Reported Data within the Acute Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review.在急性医疗保健环境中使用患者报告数据:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;19(18):11160. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811160.
7
Compassionate Healthcare for Parents of Children with Life-limiting Illnesses: A Qualitative Study.为患有危及生命疾病儿童的父母提供的关怀医疗:一项定性研究。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2022 Jul-Sep;28(3):266-271. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_50_2021. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
8
Organized Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Attendance and Determinants in Rural China.有组织的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:中国农村地区的参与情况和决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 6;19(14):8237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148237.
9
Association of Hospital Characteristics and Previous Hospitalization-Related Experiences with Patients' Perceptions of Hospital Care in China.医院特征和既往住院相关经历与患者对中国医院护理的认知的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 27;19(13):7856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137856.
10
Role of Dutch internal policy advisors in a hospital quality improvement programme and their influence on nurses' role development: a qualitative study.荷兰内部政策顾问在医院质量改进计划中的作用及其对护士角色发展的影响:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e051998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051998.