Suppr超能文献

一种评估献血者选择质量的原创方法:检查献血者问卷并分析献血者延期率。

An Original Approach to Evaluating the Quality of Blood Donor Selection: Checking Donor Questionnaires and Analyzing Donor Deferral Rate.

作者信息

Gillet Philippe, Neijens Esther

机构信息

Service du Sang, Belgian Red-Cross, Suarlée, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 21;5:74. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00074. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Blood donor selection is a cornerstone for blood transfusion safety, designed to safeguard the health of both donors and recipients. In the Service du Sang, Belgian Red Cross, French and German-speaking part of Belgium (SFS), health professionals (HPs) are allowed to interview donors on their own after formal qualification. This qualification is afterward evaluated by means of two complementary quality indicators: monitoring of donor health questionnaires (DHQs) and analysis of donor deferral rate. The study aims to evaluate the degree to which both quality indicators may be useful and appropriate tools to evaluate the quality of blood donor selection. An analysis performed on 2016 data showed that noncompliance detected by means of DHQ monitoring seems to be more frequent in HPs who conduct a low number of interviews compared to all HPs as a group (5.67 vs. 3.23%;  < 0.001). Deferral rates are also higher in HPs with a lower activity compared to HPs who interview more donors (14.80 vs. 13.00%,  < 0.001). Furthermore, statistically differences are observed between the type of blood donation venue in terms of the global deferral rate (for instance fixed site vs. schools: 11.9 vs. 19.5%;  < 0.001), and specific reasons for deferral (such as sexual risk behavior and travel in at-risk areas, the differences being highly significant between each category of blood donation venue;  < 0.001). Providing the HPs with feedback on these findings was an opportunity to draw their attention to some aspects of the selection process in order to improve it.

摘要

献血者筛选是输血安全的基石,旨在保障献血者和受血者双方的健康。在比利时红十字会比利时法语和德语区献血服务中心(SFS),健康专业人员(HPs)在正式取得资格后可自行对献血者进行访谈。之后通过两个互补的质量指标对该资格进行评估:监测献血者健康问卷(DHQs)和分析献血者延期率。本研究旨在评估这两个质量指标在多大程度上可能是评估献血者筛选质量的有用且合适的工具。对2016年数据进行的分析表明,与所有健康专业人员作为一个整体相比,通过DHQ监测发现的不符合情况在访谈次数较少的健康专业人员中似乎更为频繁(5.67%对3.23%;<0.001)。与访谈较多献血者的健康专业人员相比,活动量较低的健康专业人员的延期率也更高(14.80%对13.00%,<0.001)。此外,在全球延期率方面,不同献血地点类型之间存在统计学差异(例如固定地点与学校:11.9%对19.5%;<0.001),以及延期的具体原因(如性风险行为和前往高危地区旅行,各类献血地点之间的差异非常显著;<0.001)。向健康专业人员提供这些调查结果的反馈是一个契机,可引起他们对筛选过程某些方面的关注,以便加以改进。

相似文献

6
Review of blood donor deferral with emphasis on donor and patient safety.以献血者和患者安全为重点的献血者延期审查。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2023 Feb;30(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

本文引用的文献

4
6
Evaluation of a new German blood donor questionnaire.评价一种新的德国献血者问卷。
Vox Sang. 2014 Jan;106(1):55-60. doi: 10.1111/vox.12088. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
8
Donor return after temporary deferral.供者暂时延期返回。
Transfusion. 2011 Jun;51(6):1188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02989.x. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
9
Evidence-based selection criteria to protect blood donors.保护献血者的循证选择标准。
J Clin Apher. 2010;25(6):331-7. doi: 10.1002/jca.20257. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
10
Complications related to blood donation: a population-based study.与献血相关的并发症:一项基于人群的研究。
Vox Sang. 2008 Feb;94(2):132-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.01000.x. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验